State court Essays

The States Courts would likely hear case (a) and the Federal Courts would likely hear case (c). Sometimes, the jurisdiction of state courts will overlap with that of federal courts, meaning that some cases can be brought in both courts. With that being said, both cases (b) and (d) are prime examples of the overlap. With cases (b) and (d) being able to go to either to state or federal courts, we then need to find the determining factors to what court would be the proper one for the cases. For instance

I began by examining the structure of each state 's court system as outlined by their respective website. I began in Wisconsin where the lowest courts are municipal courts. Wisconsin has 237 municipal courts staffed by 240 municipal judges. The largest municipal court is in Milwaukee and is staffed by three full time judges and hears more than 110,000 cases yearly. Municipal courts hear cases from a wide variety of cases, including traffic, parking, building code violations, trespassing, health

enforce laws to protect our society. The court systems have been deliberating on a wide range of issues and delivering justice in accordance to the law without fear or favor. There are two judicial systems, the federal courts and state courts. Each of these has jurisdictions on the kind or type of cases they can and should liberate on all under the Nation’s constitution. State courts have cases which violate state laws created by state officers while federal courts deal with violations of laws created

Article III of the United States Constitution, it states “The judicial power of the United States, shall be vested in one Supreme Court, and in such inferior courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. The judges, both of the supreme and inferior courts, shall hold their offices during good behavior, and shall, receive for their services, a compensation, which shall not be diminished during their continuance in office.” This means that Supreme Court Justices are allowed to hold

The United States Court system much reflects the historic roots of the country, differing from state to state, while evolving and reforming as time goes on. The court systems in the United States are organized in a hierarchy. Approximately 50% of the states have a unified court system; meaning that the court system in a state operates as a single administrative unit. The other half of the states do not follow this unified system. Some have as many as 9 different trial courts combined with appellate

The first court case will be Kent v. United States which took place on January 19th, 1966. This court case involved a 16-year-old child named Morris A. Kent Jr, he was detained and interrogated by police for several crimes including robbery and rape (Kent v. United States). After a few days in court Kent admitted to being involved in most of the crimes that he was detained and interrogated about (Kent v. United States). Because of Kent admitting to several crimes the court decided to wavier the jurisdiction

Supreme Court cases can shape our national laws; it can shape an American citizen’s future. Without them, the Bill of Rights could be left up for our own interpretation. This could cause unfair laws and create havoc. In 1966, a court case named Kent vs United Sates took place. This case could create the ability to shape a juvenile's life forever. The court case, Kent vs. United States took place in 1966. This case was about Morris Kent, a 16-year-old boy who had been on probation since he was

State v. Hendrix A Supreme Court case where the defendant Homer O. Hendrix was convicted and found guilty of voluntary manslaughter. Hendrix was sentenced to a term of 15 years in prison. The events leading up to the Supreme Court’s ruling takes place take place 3 years earlier. Labor Day, September 1, 1975, Hendrix and another member of the community Norman D. Cherry got into a confrontation on Hendrix’s property. Hendrix and his family were at an outing on the shore Lake Murray which was located

Kent v. United States Juveniles… not old enough to vote, drive, buy/use alcohol, enter casinos, or even see a rated “R” movie legally. So, then what makes them eligible to be tried as adults in the court of law? A common sense decision to enforce more mature behavior, or a glaring flaw in the system that causes more conflict than solution? There are many opinions on how juvenile court decisions should be handled in our judicial system today. The verdicts of numerous trials in the 60’s , including

organization of Federal and State governmental divisions establishes the US Legal System. Every state has its own court system, plus the federal government one, fifty-two in total. Each state has its own constitution, governmental structure, legal codes and judiciary system. The structural system of the State Courts changes depending on the state and every State Court has its own characteristics, even though in some cases they are the same. One judge presides in most of the state courts of limited jurisdiction

In the United States, the Constitution is the supreme law of the land. Within the Constitution, a federal system of government has been created where power is shared between the federal and state governments in which both have their own court systems as well as laws (Gluck, 2014). The constitution created two parallel criminal justice systems which add a complexity to the system as a whole (Neubauer & Fradella, 2014). Although it may appear there are two separate court systems, there is actually

Constitution grants the Supreme Court the power to review cases and declare a verdict. However, the Supreme Court is only allowed to make a decision regarding a case if and only it is brought to them. In other words, only cases that has been passed through the lower courts and has made its way up into the Supreme Court is the Supreme Court allowed to make a decision. From the founding of the constitution, many cases have made its way up the courts and into the Supreme Court where the Justices deliver

The United States Supreme Court is an example of a traditional way of being heard by the government when you feel that your state court has failed you, or you have exhausted all your options on the state level and so escalate your case to the federal level to hopefully gain correct and proper justice. The Supreme Court hears cases brought before them in several different ways. Most are done by petition for a “writ of certiorari”, which means it’s been accepted and may proceed to review. A second

Michael Morton V. State of Texas In 1986, Michael Morton was having a normal life, he had a wife, a kid, and a job. That same year his life change completely. Michael Morton was doing his daily routine, as in going to his job, coming back to his wife, and kid. When he came back from his job, he found his wife murdered in their bed. He was wrongfully convicted of the murder with enough evidence showing his innocence. After spending nearly 25 years in prison for a conviction that he didn’t commit.

This Supreme Court case between Microsoft and the United States government initially started from a drug trafficking case that occurred in December of 2013. A New York County judge issued a warrant to retrieve electronic data regarding this case that was denied by Microsoft based on a law created in 1986 known as the Electronic Communications Privacy Act. This response from Microsoft led to an appeal to the Second Circuit court which resulted in a decision on Microsoft’s behalf. The court's decision

The court case of State of Nebraska v. Gary E. Heitman deals with the conviction of Heitman on charges of criminal conspiracy to commit first degree sexual assault on a minor. “Heitman contends that the evidence was insufficient to convict and that he was entrapped” (Heitman p.1) while the court concluded that “there was sufficient evidence to support the conviction” (Heitman p.1) and “further determined that the district court was not clearly wrong in finding that Heitman was predisposed to commit

United States v. Lopez was the first United States Supreme Court case since the New Deal to set limits to Congress's power under the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution. The issue of the case was that It exceeded to the power of Congress which had no say over it because the case had nothing to do with commerce or any sort of economic activity. The case United States v. Lopez involved Alfonzo Lopez Jr., Supreme Court Justice William H. Rehnquist, and Congress. Unites States v. Lopez

No, The United States Should Not Join the International Criminal Court, because the International Criminal Court (ICC) is an inter-governmental tribunal and an organization with headquarters located in Hague in Netherlands. It has the duty to prosecute individuals who have carried out genocide, atrocities, and crimes against humanity (Schabas 2). The court was formed in July 2002. It was the year when the Rome Statute was enforced. This document represented a multilateral treaty that serves as the

The American court system does not function as a single entity that adjudicates all claims presented before it but as divided courts representing the individual fifty state governments and one the central federal government in a judicial federalism structure. The United States Constitution binds the federal government as it examines the cases before it, and each state government is obligated to its state constitution when rendering decisions. Claims that can originate in either or both systems further

Court Systems: Comparing Canada, the United States, and Mexico This paper is a discussion of the court systems of Canada, the United States, and Mexico. The aim of the paper is to point highlight similarities and differences in each judicial system. It will allow the reader an insight to the how each country operates its judicial branch. When considering the court systems between the Canada, United States, and Mexico, one must look further than courts themselves, at the Constitutions of the three