Sylvanus Thayer Award Essays

WWII and Korea. His Thayer Award Acceptance Address given at West Point Military School went through ethos, logos and militaristic diction to commemorate and entrust the new West Point Cadets who would one day lead our country. To change the speech to a different audience, one would have to use more pathos and common diction to make the speech have a different feel and audience, but maintain the same message. MacArthur was a very brave and commanding general. His Thayer award speech acceptance passed

“Duty, Honor, Country. Those three hallowed words reverently dictate what you ought to be, what you can be what you will be.” (MacArthur). General Douglas MacArthur delivered his speech “Duty, Honor, Country” in 1962 when he received the Thayer Award at the United States Military Academy at West Point. His primary audience is the West Point Corps of Cadets, some four thousand future officers of the United States Military. It is MacArthur’s purpose to explain the phrase “Duty, Honor, Country.”

When looking at a map of the continent, Africa Togo is not the first country seen. It appears as a small sliver of land between Ghana and Benin. Togo is extremely small, ranking 119th in size whereas the United States of America and Canada tie for second. With only 21,925 square miles Togo is not easily seen on the map, however the country is particularly interesting in terms of government. With, the earliest records of government coming into play around the 15th century, and a bloody government

Romanticism was an artistic movement that invaded most of Europe countries, USA North and South, but did not invade France until the eighteenth century; the peak of this movement was in mid-of the eighteenth century. It was a reaction caused by the industrial revolution. It was a mutiny against the aristocratic social and political standards of the age of enlightenment and a reaction against the rational rationalization. In our part “Romanticism” was provided by a specific space, and we chose to

n the words of Albert Einstein, “The true sign of intelligence is not knowledge but imagination.” The writer, E.E Cummings used imagination to create words that had never existed, and made his poems seem alive. Edward Estlin Cummings, commonly known by E.E Cummings, was born in Cambridge, Massachusetts in the year 1894. He started to write poems at a young age, and his style of writing was very distinct. At the beginning of his writing career, he had a hard time finding publishers to publish his

Analysis of “Casey at Bat” “Casey at Bat”, by Ernest Lawrence Thayer, is a poem about a baseball game that is nearing completion and they need their best player to get a hit to win the game. Thayer uses imagery, similes, and word choice to help express the hopes of the crowd in Mudville. First, Ernest used imagery to describe the scene at the game. He states, “So upon that stricken multitude grim melancholy sat…” (Thayer 17). This helps show how the crowd is grim and disappointed. Next

After the conclusion of the American Civil War in 1865, there was a period during which the American Military was among the strongest in the world. However, after the war, citizens and politicians began to question the need for a strong military. General Sheridan, Commanding General of the Army (1844), evaluated that the probability of a full scale attack on America was highly improbable due to complicated logistics across seas. This, therefore allowed Americans to focus on domestic problems as opposed

Standing there sweaty and tired after the last game of the season. You look over at the other team who did have tons of energy, not sweaty at all , and look like they did not try at all. They announce that your team got first but everyone still get a trophy. How would you feel to give a 100% and get the same trophy as a person who only gave 50%. There is a debate on should we give out participation trophies. Many people think everyone should get a trophy for going out there and trying. Others think

Participation Trophies the Good and the Bad Say you are in the last game of the season and you didn’t win any games this season but you still get a trophy, what do you do with it? This has been a large discussion that has spread it all started with a NFL linebacker James Harrison wouldn’t let his two sons take their participation as they ended their season. Participation trophies aren’t a good idea for many reasons. I don’t agree with handing out participation trophies for the following reasons…

A popular issue today, should kids get participation trophies for trying? One side says, “Yes they should get participation trophies”. While the other side declares “No they should not get trophies”. I believe that kids should not get the trophies. Not handing out trophies will help kids in many ways. I think that we should not hand out trophies for trying because it helps you realize that you are going to lose in life. It will teach you how to deal with losing so you don’t have to when you get older

The question is, “Should kids get a trophy for showing up?” I would have to say that they shouldn’t get a trophy for just showing up. What is the point of getting a trophy if you don’t actually do anything. I would agree that they ones that do show up and actually do something, should get a trophy, but to say if kids that show just show should get a trophy is something else. If someone were to play basketball and they didn’t do anything they shouldn’t be able participate in the sport, it is ridiculous

should achieve a medal or a trophy for participation. Some argue this can mend children’s expectations for the ‘real world.’ On the other hand, some believe this will affect the children positively if they do receive these awards. Children would benefit from receiving participation awards. This is because of self esteem, and equality. Kids would also be able to celebrate their achievements from an early age. Parker Abate, who wrote the article, In Youth Sports, Participation Trophies send

Should everyone in an event receive a participation award? In the text Pros and Cons: A Look At Participation Trophies For Youth Athletes by Travis Armideo, and In Defense of Participation Trophies: Why They Really Do Teach the Right Values by Lisa Hefferman both make similar points and help determine whether participation awards are necessary for young kids. They both explain the benefits of participation awards as well as acknowledging their flaws too such as how they affect kids and how they also

wrong kind of praise and undermines the success of the children, then they begin to believe they should be rewarded for insignificant tasks. Giving kid’s participation awards don’t benefit those who receive them. It gives the child the wrong kind of commendation when they receive the awards. Today kids in youth sports will acquire awards from any place first, last, and between. This sets an example for them getting that last place is satisfactory. However, people will say feelings won’t become hurt

awarded to youth athletes for simply showing up to practice and games. These awards loose their meaning when given to everyone. Trophies are used for extrinsic motivation. Awards given to youth athletes, when they don’t earn it, don’t prepare them for the real world. The "Trophies for All" policy makes it where all youth athletes receive participation trophies just for signing up to be on the team.            Participation awards loose their meaning. In Scope magazine's, "Should Everyone Get A Trophy

Should everyone get a participation trophy? According to the "trophies for all " policy, youth athletes are being awarded with the participation trophies. Participation trophies don’t benefit the hard working youth athletes. Buying participation trophies is a poor way to spend scarce funds. Finally, participation trophies can harm the youth athletes receiving them. On the other hand, some coaches believe it is worth spending the money to see a kid smile. Every youth athlete does not need to receive

Many sports programs give every child a trophy after the season comes to an end ;however, that is not needed. If one team does better than another, they should get to feel special by being rewarded in a way that lets them know that they’ve accomplished something that is more significant than their competition with a trophy . Most children who get awarded with participation trophies hear the few words “You are all winners,“ but in life that is not always true. Everyone loses in life, and nobody is

used is for better educating coaches . When you better coaches, you better the kids so that they can actually receive a first place trophy . Money on participation trophies have many other reasons to be spent, as argued in "Do We Need Participation Awards?" Getting trophies for showing up teaches the wrong idea of getting rewarded for doing nothing . Also research shows that extrinsic motivation on it's own can be harmful not helpful . You don't reward kids for showing up to practices and

What accomplishment were you most proud of? Why? Making the plaque was the accomplishment that I was most proud of because it gave me a lot of sentimental value as well as making memories with all the grades 9s and teachers that I met in Zion. I wanted to do a fun project that gave me a way to bond with each of my fellow colleagues in grade 9 and with my teachers, as I got to talk to all of them and get them to sign it. This was project done because, the grade 9s of 2016 in Zion and other junior

The question people are asking is, “Are participation trophies good to give to kids?.” Getting them trophies makes them feel like they are winning something and it is showing them to work hard to achieve greatness. People have been talking about how NFL Linebacker James Harrison and his Instagram post. In the post Harrison talks about how his sons got a participation trophies from their football coaches and how he decided to give the trophies that they earned back. This is wrong, the kids should