ipl-logo

2. What Is The Sudan Doing To Support Or Condemn This Issue?

428 Words2 Pages

Does the Republic of the Sudan support or condemn this issue?
The Republic of the Sudan strongly supports the stemming of the proliferation of nuclear weapons, not only in Asia but in the whole world. Sudan envisions for a world devoid of nuclear weapons and strives to achieve this goal.
2) What is the Republic of the Sudan doing to support or condemn this issue?
The Republic of the Sudan does not have any present projects for nuclear weapons in order to prevent the increasing spread of nuclear weapons; but it has not taken any direct action to reduce the proliferation of nuclear weapons in Asia, in particular.
It has ratified and signed treaties to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons in the world, as a whole. These include:
a) The Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty …show more content…

c) Sudan has signed and ratified the African Nuclear Weapon-Free- Zone Treaty
(Pelindaba Treaty) in the July of 1964, in its quest to rid the world of nuclear weapons. 3) What is the Republic of the Sudan planning to do in the future to support or condemn this issue?
The Republic of the Sudan pledges to abide by the laws of all the treaties that it has signed and ratified. It will also support and abide by any new ways of fighting the growing threat of nuclear weapons. It will continue to propagate and reveal the threat that nuclear weapons are.

4) What can be done to stem the proliferation of nuclear weapons in Asian states?
There are a few methods for this and some that can be followed in the current circumstances are outlined below:

a) States can be showed reason, of what they can achieve if they put their income in something other than nuclear weapons.
b) If these methods do not work, international pressure has to be exerted on the un-cooperating state. This will result in bitter international

Show More
Related
1118 Words | 5 Pages

The treaty was signed by Reagan and Mikhail Gorbachev. It was to eliminate and control the use of nuclear weapons that could fire long distances. All launchers that had a range of 500-5500 kilometers were to be destroyed. This was effective, but it also came to an end. It got rid of nearly 2,700 missiles.

Read More
207 Words | 1 Pages

In the book Empire of the Summer Moon: Quanah Parker and the Rise and Fall of the Comanches, the Most Powerful Indian Tribe in American History by S. C. Gwynne, we learned of two stories that may not be well known in history, but they are very astonishing. One of the stories is about the Comanches, who may not have been well known but they became one of the most powerful Indian tribes in American history. We learn of the rise and fall of their tribe and how they became known for their extreme fighting abilities. The other story told in this book was the story of Cynthia Ann Parker and her son Quanah, who was a half- blood Indian. The Comanches fought with the white settlers to take control of the American west.

Read More
1481 Words | 6 Pages

The US heavy-handedly pressured them to refrain from nuclear exports, specifically in the German-Brazilian deal. The US’ loud voice instilled the pact set forth in the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty of 1968. Until 1974 most nations had approached nuclear weapons and civilian uses of nuclear energy separately. Both sides in outlining their grievances towards each other often used article 4. “All the Parties to the Treaty undertake to facilitate, and have the right to participate in, the fullest possible exchange of equipment, materials and scientific and technological information for the peaceful uses of nuclear energy.”

Read More
1298 Words | 6 Pages

Also the way that President John F. Kennedy was able to make a treaty, Limited Nuclear Test Ban Treaty on July 25, 1963. between the U.S and USSR to make sure both sides aren’t testing nuclear weapons in open air or in the

Read More
688 Words | 3 Pages

The abolition of nuclear weapons wouldn't really be progress if all other countries still have them Therefore, why should the United States get rid of them. Document D

Read More
302 Words | 2 Pages

Schlosser asserts that Iran shouldn’t be able to possess nuclear weapons due to the pervasive threat it will pose. He acknowledges that nuclear weapons haven’t been used since the World War II, which suggests that a nuclear war will never happen. In addition, Schlosser emphasizes the ubiquity of the belief that nuclear weapons serve as war deterrents between nuclear powers by quoting Kenneth Waltz. Schlosser agrees that the belief does describe recent situations but doesn’t portray the future.

Read More
887 Words | 4 Pages

Before his election to the presidency, Dwight Eisenhower sought to contain the atom’s destructive power (). Yet, in his first speech at the United Nations as President of the United States, Eisenhower argued for the normalization of the international proliferation of nuclear technology (Office of the President, 1953). The motivation behind his now famous “Atoms for Peace” speech illuminates an interesting contradiction between the obvious American nonproliferation objectives and the president’s political calculation. The key to understanding this contradiction is to separate Eisenhower’s contemporary political motivations from the consequences of the president’s choice to pursue international proliferation of peaceful nuclear technology.

Read More
913 Words | 4 Pages

The country’s history shows Sudan is constantly at war, often for religious, ethnic reasons. “Sudan has been involved in civil war fueled by religious, ethnic and regional strife since the mid-1980s.” (Who). Wars occurred often, with one of the recent wars being a civil war that began in 1985 (Lost Boys). This war was sparked for religious reasons, and went on for a while.

Read More
472 Words | 2 Pages

World war one otherwise known as the cold war was a brutal life changing dispute between the allies and axis powers. The countries in WW1 on the ally’s side were France, United Kingdom, Russia, and Italy. Fighting for the axis was Germany Austria-Hungary, Ottoman Empire and Bulgaria. Even though the United States wasn’t a major ally during the start of this conflict its influence flipped the balance of war. Unlike many soldiers in Europe at the beginning of the war Americans for the most part did not want to get involved in this dispute.

Read More
743 Words | 3 Pages

Sudan is located in Africa next to Egypt, and it lays on the red sea. It was ruled at the time between 1896-1956. Sudan was at the time a backward, non-technological, simple life before imperialism. It had a lot of rich resources such as oil, natural gas, gold, silver, copper, nickel and agriculture which were the number one goal of any imperialist country. Sudan like any colonized country suffered from a lot of good effects and bad side effects some of them were short term impact and some are long term impact.

Read More
262 Words | 2 Pages

The art of fear is essential in nuclear deterrence. Using the film Dr. Strangelove (Stanley Kubrick, 1964) I will argue that nuclear deterrence is hard to achieve when communication of nuclear capabilities is not well established amongst states. In this paper, I will use the film Dr. Strangelove (1964) to argue how theories such as deterrence theory, realist theory, security dilemma, preventative war, pre-emptive war as well as relative gains and zero sum game led to a failure to achieve nuclear deterrence between the United States and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. To make my argument on how more nuclear weapons may hinder deterrence, this essay will proceed as follows; I will firstly discuss the how nuclear deterrence and mutually

Read More
562 Words | 3 Pages

“To this day, the Sudanese government continues its long-standing policy of attacking innocent civilians. In addition to the ongoing crisis in Darfur, forces under the command of Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir have carried out attacks against civilians in the disputed Abyei territory, and South Kordofan and Blue Nile States.” ( End Genocide). As stated in the article, the government isn't trying to help. The government is spreading hate and violence, darfurians is having trouble keeping up and not getting caught in the mess, even though the violence and destruction is directed toward

Read More
671 Words | 3 Pages

The U.S. has the help of advanced technology to produce countless amount of nuclear weapons, and just with that it is one threat to consider. We must understand that this matters to people everywhere. One nuclear weapon explosion will cause a chain reaction no matter where it happens, and there will be no end to what the consequences may be. None of the challenges put on us can solved quickly or easily. But we can start by listening to one another and work together, so that we may focus on our common interests, rather than our differences; and that we bring forward our shared values.

Read More
1419 Words | 6 Pages

The United States has repeatedly called upon China to be harsher on North Korea; a request for cooperation in an otherwise politically hostile environment. Recent sanctions imposed by the UN Security Council shows that China and the US do in fact wish to cooperate on North Korea, however, it took compromise on the part of the United States in order to get China to agree to the terms. The increasing power of China is reflected in this decision, as the United States has, historically, not been a nation willing to compromise – usually, other states are the abiding ones. China’s ability to hold the sanctions hostage pending cooperation from the United States shows the country’s self-determination influencing international decisions. Furthermore, this persuasive action of China (and Russia, for what it is worth) in this agreement undermines the sanctity of the United Nations, and exemplifies the reality of the realist approach to international governance; that there isn’t one.

Read More
862 Words | 4 Pages

Proliferation groups are trying to get the US to lead the way and destroying and disarming their atomic bombs in hopes that other countries will follow. Forster proposes these ideas in his own words. "The goal of the treaty is to "prevent the spread of nuclear weapons and weapons technology, to promote co-operation in the peaceful uses of nuclear energy and to further the goal of achieving nuclear disarmament and general and complete disarmament."(Forster). The US cannot just say disarm your weapons and not do the same themselves. The US needs to take charge and start things themselves.

Read More

More about 2. What Is The Sudan Doing To Support Or Condemn This Issue?

Related Topics

Open Document