ipl-logo

Adnan Syed Trial: Guilty Or Evidence?

561 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Importance of evidence in criminal case

Adnan Syed Trial: NOT GUILTY
Can a court really convict someone of murder if it doesn’t have any hard evidence? Although the answer should be no, this sometimes happens, such as in the case of Adnan Syed. He was a teenage boy who was accused of murder; however, he was a good kid who had never been in trouble before. He was an athlete and got along well with most of his peers. Then, he was charged with the murder of his ex-girlfriend, put on trial, and eventually convicted. The evidence, though, doesn’t support that conviction; there wasn’t enough concrete evidence to unquestionably prove his guilt. Adnan Syed was unfairly convicted of the murder of Hae Min Lee.
Through his trial, the prosecution did not present sufficient evidence to fully …show more content…

Syed had no history of violence and still doesn’t, ‘“Prisons are among the most violent places in our society," they wrote, "yet Syed has not been cited for a single violent act in 17 years in that environment’” (Fenton). The Baltimore Sun article states that Syed requires minimum supervision and is constantly reverent to staff. Although, that is not so important to his case it does back it up and make the judge more likely to help everyone understand what type of person Syed is and was. Jay Wilds was a witness and was even involved in Hae Min Lee’s Murder; Wilds was also taken in for an interview to find out what happened that night (Chaudry). Syed’s friend Jay Wilds has been put on the spot countless times and failed to tell the same story each time he was questioned (Chaudry). Knowing there is additional evidence to go with this case, these points provided the most beneficial information on Syed’s case.
In conclusion, there may have been weak evidence and evidence to help set him free, but Adnan Syed is not guilty. Gutierrez -Syed’s lawyer- did not get all the information she needed, but still getting points that were imperative. Knowing Syed has never been violent and still isn’t, having an alibi at the library, and uncertain to Adnan Syed and his family why he was unfairly convicted. Still waiting for a new trial, will Adnan Syed be guilty or will he finally get his

Show More
Related
340 Words | 2 Pages

A young boy name Adnan syed has been jailed for six-teen year because he was found guilty for murder of his ex girlfriend Hae Min Lee. A woman named Sarah kogen reopened Adnan Syed case after fifteen years of serving jail. it is obvious that Adnan Syed is not guilty because the evidence that was found was not tested. Also prosecutor jay was caught lying and keep changing his history.

Read More
2292 Words | 10 Pages

Out of all of the witnesses and all of the facts, the only hard evidence the prosecution had was Jay Wilds’ testimony and Adnan’s own cell phone records. Without the records, the jury must simply decide who is more credible- Jay or Asia. In fact, in a 2015 interview with The Intercept, prosecutor Kevin Urick admits that either Jay’s testimony or the cell phone evidence by itself would not be enough to prove Adnan’s guilt. Therefore, the state needs both of them to put Adnan away. But honestly, the state has neither comfortably.

Read More
744 Words | 3 Pages

In his most recent appeal, Adnan claims that his lawyer, Cristina Gutierrez, failed to provide an effective defense. Specifically, she never contacted the alibi witness, Asia McLean, and she never pursued any plea-bargain conversations that Syed had requested. Whether these accounts are true or not, it seems like Adnan didn’t get Gutierrez’ A-game when she was defending his life. This evidence supports the claim because it shows that Gutierrez did not use all of her evidence properly and seems as though she did not prepare enough for the trial which is probably a key factor of why Adnan was convicted in the first place. Christina Gutierrez was having medical issues but she didn’t know it.

Read More
1184 Words | 5 Pages

This loose evidence has many people wondering: is one witness really enough for a conviction? The answer is no, the state’s case was not strong enough to convict Adnan Syed, it was formulated to accuse an innocent

Read More
374 Words | 2 Pages

Murder Case Against Adnan Syed In 1999, a murder case spiked the enthusiasm of the community of Baltimore, Maryland. Hae Min Lee was the victim of this unforgettable murder which brought together three main suspects: Adnan Syed, Jay Wilds, and Don; however, Don and Hae had only been together thirteen days prior to the murder. This rose suspicion in the case but for some reason was not analyzed as much as it should have been. Don did not have a solid alibi during that day, but he was thrown out the window.

Read More
1187 Words | 5 Pages

This is it, we got him, Adnan is free. Today starts the new trial, Adnan is still on trial due to Jay's testimony. The judge said due to the DNA Adnan will probably be found not guilty. Here we are in the courtroom, all of Haes family, Adnans, Jays, and my nieces is.

Read More
976 Words | 4 Pages

Even with Jay’s testimony, I don't believe that Adnan Syed should have been convicted of murder on such little evidence. The state’s motive for Adnan is based on Muslim stereotypes and no real evidence. They say that when Hae broke up with Adnan she besmirched his honor, forcing him to have to kill her to regain it. Adnan has shown many times that he doesn’t follow strict Muslim rules by dating multiple girls, partying, and even smoking marijuana.

Read More
649 Words | 3 Pages

In my opinion, I think Adnan Syed is innocent what do you think? This argumentative essay is about a serial podcast is about the 1999 murder of Hae Min Lee. The person charged for her murder and sentenced to 15 years in prison was Adnan Syed but due to the evidence I do not think Adnan Syed is Guilty of the murder of Hae Min Lee. The first reason why I think Adnan Syed is innocent.

Read More
829 Words | 4 Pages

A piece of evidence that supports this is, "During the trial, it was revealed that the prosecution's timeline of events, as supported by the cell phone records, didn't align with the actual call logs, suggesting a discrepancy in the state's narrative." This evidence indicates that Adnan's conviction may have been based on flawed or misleading information. In light of the discrepancies between the prosecution's timeline and the actual cell phone records presented during Adnan Syed's trial, it becomes evident that the evidence used to convict him is questionable. This inconsistency undermines the credibility of the state's narrative, suggesting that Adnan's guilt may have been based on erroneous or incomplete information. By highlighting these discrepancies, we can see that the prosecution's case against Adnan lacks the solid foundation necessary for a conviction.

Read More
1567 Words | 7 Pages

If a person is convicted of a murder, why wouldn’t he be trying to defend their case? Adnan Syed is guilty of Hae Min Lee’s murder. On January 13, 1999, Hae Min Lee, a popular high school senior, disappeared and was found dead. Six weeks later, Adnan Syed, Hae’s ex-boyfriend, was found guilty of her murder. He claims to be innocent but there is evidence to prove that he was guilty.

Read More
554 Words | 3 Pages

I believe Adnan is innocent because the evidence used to determine the verdict isn't justly sufficient, minorities were unfairly targeted for crimes, and he's psychologically incapable of being considered a murderer.

Read More
1084 Words | 5 Pages

Jay didn't mention this during his trial but he told Sarah that him and Adnan went to smoke weed that day. This was a big deal for both of them because how did Jay remember all of what Adnan did but yet he still lies about where he was. This shows me that Adnan Syed is not guilty because although Jay has his alibis and Adnan has his, Jay’s alibi Jenn was covering up for.him. She hid a lot of information from the police that could have possibly proved Adnan’s innocence

Read More
1594 Words | 7 Pages

Nikko Sheppard Mr. Salazar English 3 9 February, 2023 Adnan Syed’s Innocence In 1999, 17-year-old Adnan Syed is accused of strangling and murdering his ex-girlfriend, Hae Min Lee. The two were classmates at Woodlawn High School, in Baltimore, Maryland. January 13, 1999, is the last day Hae is seen alive at school. On February 9th, Hae’s body is found buried in Leakin Park.

Read More
216 Words | 1 Pages

Of course, many people think Adnan Syed is guilty of murdering Hae by contradicting himself, by saying, “I am in here for my own mistakes.” He might have been on the edge of confessing his guilt until Sarah caught this and asked what he meant, and quickly recovers from his mistake. Adnan also slips his tongue by saying that he wants people to only look at the evidence, and not his personality. If I were convicted of a crime I would certainly like to have my personality be looked at, if I were innocent. So they could see what good I have done.

Read More
1164 Words | 5 Pages

If our judicial system still believes that someone is innocent until proven guilty, then Adnan has to be innocent, because they did not prove him

Read More

More about Adnan Syed Trial: Guilty Or Evidence?

Related Topics

Open Document