ipl-logo

Adnan Syed Vs. The Case Of Hae Jjy

527 Words3 Pages

Each year, there are 11,500 people serving jail time for a crime they didn’t commit. There’s an average of 975 innocent people locked up each year. People can get imprisoned on little to no evidence, which is what happened to Adnan Syed. In the true crime podcast Serial, Adnan Syed should not have been convicted for the murder of Hae Min Lee. Seeing that there's a scarcity of evidence, Jay Wilds story is not consistent, and Adnan had an alibi. There’s a scarce amount of evidence to convict Adnan Syed. For example, the hardest piece of evidence that is supposed to prove Adnan guilty is a fingerprint of his on a map found in Hae’s car. Koenig “The Case Against Adnan Syed”.Keep in mind Hae and Adnan started dating in 1998 and broke up in December of that same year. This is not evidence against Adnan. Because DNA doesn’t expire, those prints could be months old. Considering it showed where they got around and most of the places they would go, of course you would find his prints on a map in her car.Considering everything stated above, there isn’t enough incriminating evidence to convict Adnan. …show more content…

In the second taped interview, he says he went to Security Square Mall. In the first taped statement, Jay says he refused to help dig a grave for Hae. Two weeks later, he says they both dug the hole.MacGivallary confronts Jay, ticking off the list of the main things he’s lied to them about and Jay admits to all the lies. Koenig “Inconsistencies”. Jay should be able to remember whether or not he helped bury a dead body with Adnan. The cops can’t rely on Jay to put the case together.These are just two examples of changes, there are many more details that changed when Jay was in interviews with the detectives. All things considered, these are reasons why Jay isn’t a trustworthy

More about Adnan Syed Vs. The Case Of Hae Jjy

Open Document