ipl-logo

America With Nuclear Technology Essay

557 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Nuclear energy pro and cons

The Future of America with Nuclear Technology
Nuclear technology has come a long way recently, and it has been developing in many countries. It has many uses, such as energy and it can be used in warfare. Some people believe that nuclear weapons and power plants are so dangerous that they should be banned. Others believe that nuclear energy is worth the dangers and that nuclear bombs protect the United States from other countries. The purpose of this paper is to inform you on how nuclear power is harvested and whether its uses are worth the risks.
In order to use a nuclear material such as Uranium, it has to go through many processes to become usable. Its main two uses are for nuclear weapons and also for energy. Nuclear energy by definition is
“By separating an atom into two lighter atoms, there is a net loss of mass. This mass is not exactly lost but rather transformed into massive amounts of energy. This is what is referred to as nuclear fission. By controlling these reactions …show more content…

Some of the pros are that nuclear energy is “Relatively low in cost and pollution, sustainable, reliable, and efficient”(Maehlum 1). The price of beginning a nuclear facility is expensive, but as time goes on, it becomes much less expensive to operate. There is also only a slight amount of pollution caused by nuclear energy and it is much cleaner than some of the resources we are using today to create energy. Nuclear energy also is very reliable and can be used for the next eighty years. This time limit could increase if nuclear facilities are converted to where they use Thorium instead of Uranium. Also, if they figure out how to control fusion, this could make nuclear energy unlimited. Nuclear energy is already widely used in America. “There are 104 commercial nuclear power plants in the United States producing a whopping 806.2 TWh of electricity, in other words about 20 % of the entire electricity generation (2008)” (Maehlum

Show More
Related
939 Words | 4 Pages

In “Nuclear Power is Not the Answer,” Helen Caldicott argues that pursuing nuclear energy would be a detriment to the United States. According to Caldicott, nuclear power, contrary to what the industry claims, is not clean and green, but rather a pollutant and a strong contributor to the destruction of the ozone layer. Because of the availability of uranium ore steadily decreasing, the process is requiring more and more fossil fuels to extract the ore. Caldicott projects that within ten to twenty years, nuclear reactors will be counterproductive because of the amount of fossil fuel it will take to mine the remaining uranium. In addition to air pollution, nuclear power plants also emit radioactive gases and materials that have the potential

Read More
662 Words | 3 Pages

Why the Fries Taste Good Eric Schlosser Fast food chains are a huge contribution to the obesity epidemic not only in America but in other countries as well. Schlosser just like many health reporters depicts the successful but unhealthy ways fast food leader, McDonalds has been able in keeping its customers wanting more. Schlosser emphasizes the additional additives in key foods such as French Fries that appeal to the consumers which is the seven different types of cooking oil, (20,Schlosser.) Schlosser uses the french fries as an example to show that in our everyday foods, they are additional additives such as “natural” or “artificial” ingredients.

Read More
695 Words | 3 Pages

Facts, data, expert opinion: a) Low Pollution such as air pollution, water pollution - Nuclear power also has a lot fewer greenhouse emissions. It has been determined that the amount of greenhouse gases have decreased by almost half because of the prevalence in the utilization of nuclear power. Nuclear energy has the least effect on nature since it doesn’t discharge any gasses like methane and carbon dioxide b) Low Operating Costs - The cost of the uranium, which is utilized as a fuel in this process, is low. Also, even though the expense of setting up nuclear power plants is moderately high, the expense of running them is quite low. The normal life of nuclear reactor is anywhere from 40-60 years, depending on how often it is used and how it is being

Read More
824 Words | 4 Pages

Over 20 percent of the energy in the United States comes from nuclear energy power plants. (Rinkesh, 2018) They so their best to get as much energy to the country as possible, but there are those out there who don’t agree with them. While there are downsides to nuclear energy, the pros vastly outweigh the cons. Nuclear power plants are a great way to get energy because they don’t let out much pollution, are very efficient, and are very safe.

Read More
607 Words | 3 Pages

Nuclear Energy IS Australia’s Future Introduction: I wholeheartedly believe that Nuclear Energy will play an inevitably central role as a reliable energy source in Australia’s future. Australia must invest in Nuclear energy because coal and oil are becoming scarce, requires less fuel and is eco-friendly. Australia is blessed with the world’s largest known uranium resources (a bountiful 38% according to Professor Mary O’Kane NSW Chief Scientist and Engineer). ANSTO (Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation) reports: ‘No country of Australia’s economic size or larger is without nuclear power’.

Read More
1117 Words | 5 Pages

They are having second thoughts. In addition, the costly price of nuclear power plants and nuclear inflexibilty, meaning it has slow start up and shutdown hours. Finally, as I mentioned before, nuclear waste, a very hazardous

Read More
576 Words | 3 Pages

Despite the negative publicity of incidents such as the reactor meltdown at Three Mile Island and the Chernobyl disaster, nuclear power remains a viable source of energy. Nuclear power produces large amounts of energy without damaging the environment with large amounts of carbon dioxide. In addition, nuclear power is more economical than traditional energy sources. Not only does it cost less to produce, it benefits the economy by creating new employment positions. Finally, nuclear energy results in fewer deaths each year than traditional fossil fuel sources.

Read More
639 Words | 3 Pages

Nuclear energy doesn’t mean putting power into a crazy man’s bomb. Nuclear energy means powering millions of people’s homes. Currently, nuclear energy powers twenty percent of U.S. electricity. The power plants of American generate 797.1 billion kilowatts per hour. There are thirty states within the U.S. that have operating nuclear reactors.

Read More
175 Words | 1 Pages

Nuclear power plants provide cheap, clean, and efficient energy and new technology might soon overcome the current drawbacks. Disasters like the ones at Chernobyl and Fukushima have long given nuclear energy an ill-deserved reputation. It produces no greenhouse gases and only trace amounts of radiation at a comparable price to coal power. However, the large initial cost and the potential for meltdowns has prevented nuclear energy from growing to supply a significant portion of the world’s electricity. Safety features on current nuclear reactors make a nuclear disaster highly unlikely, but technological advances could soon negate those risks completely.

Read More
607 Words | 3 Pages

High Stakes Since the Industrial Revolution, the use of fossil fuels has increased so quickly that the supply will no longer meet the demand. Due to this dilemma, scientists have been able to discover new ways to obtain energy through methods such as geothermal, hydroelectricity, solar, wind, and nuclear. Of the above, the most controversial method is nuclear power. Despite its promising ability to produce large amounts of energy, it places our lives, wallets, and environment at stake.

Read More
646 Words | 3 Pages

Genetically modified foods, or GMOs, are foods or living organisms that have been genetically manipulated in a laboratory through the process of genetic engineering. The genetically manipulated organisms that are produced through genetic engineering are organisms that do not occur in nature or result from traditional methods of crossbreeding. Genetic engineering has evolved and technology now allows for a transfer of genes between organisms, allowing for the production of a better, modified organism. The transfer takes place after the ideal or more desired genome has been identified. Once identified, scientists are able to simply remove the desired genome from the native or original organism and place it into the target plant.

Read More
3678 Words | 15 Pages

“Nuclear power will help provide the electricity that our growing economy needs without increasing emissions. This is truly an environmentally responsible source of energy.” Michael Burgess Prior to the introduction of nuclear energy, fossil fuel was thought to be the only available source in producing energy. Although fossil fuel, such as coal, petroleum, and natural gas, contains high energy value, it produces too many harmful byproducts that ultimately pollute our environment. With the rising concerns over global warming as more and more greenhouse gases accumulate in our Earth’s atmosphere, many voice such opinions that new alternative, yet sustainable method must be adopted to produce energy.

Read More
746 Words | 3 Pages

Audience & Purpose: The purpose of this flyer was to show a simple friendly informative page that sheds light on nuclear energy. The audience could literally be anyone wanting information on nuclear energy or people who are seeking alternative energy sources. As of late there has been a huge demand to go green. It’s only recently that nuclear power energy has been branded as “green”. This is due to the high level of carbon emission and threat of global warming.

Read More
1617 Words | 7 Pages

Chapter 2: Efficiency and risks of nuclear energy: the efficiency of nuclear energy compared to fossil fuels and other sources of energy, the use of nuclear energy in civil and military sector and its distribution worldwide, the problems concerning nuclear waste storage, accidents, radioactivity 4. Chapter 3: Possible solution to the problem: nuclear power plant conversion, a process that requires time, increase the investments on renewable energies, the last discoveries in this solar, wind, hydroelectric sector 5. Conclusion: Nuclear energy is the bridge between fossil fuels and renewable energy, after efficiency/risk analysis we have to recognize that it should not become the energy of the XXI century. Thesis Plan for the

Read More
944 Words | 4 Pages

The potential is limitless, and it should be realized as they have low greenhouse gas emissions, are efficient, powerful, cheap and reliable. Positives outweigh the negatives, and we should keep on using nuclear energy. Firstly, nuclear power generation has low greenhouse gas emissions, which make it good for the environment. The actual fission

Read More

More about America With Nuclear Technology Essay

Related Topics

Open Document