ipl-logo

Should The United States Switch To Nuclear Energy Essay

639 Words3 Pages

Nuclear energy doesn’t mean putting power into a crazy man’s bomb. Nuclear energy

means powering millions of people’s homes. Currently, nuclear energy powers twenty percent of

U.S. electricity. The power plants of American generate 797.1 billion kilowatts per hour. There

are thirty states within the U.S. that have operating nuclear reactors. The U.S. already has a well-

placed foothold on nuclear energy. I think the U.S. should switch to nuclear energy because it

would have lower operating costs, it would be more reliable, and it is better than fossil fuel. In

fact, there are ninety-nine operating nuclear reactors and more are planning to be built due to its

cheap cost.

Nuclear energy produces more energy, but at a less cost. …show more content…

People are making sure that nuclear

energy stays in business due to its safety and security. Making it less dangerous than fossil fuels.

Nuclear energy does not cause environmental danger like fossil fuels do. The small

amount of nuclear energy needed to power a plant is laughable compared to what fossil fuels

requires, “…a pound of nuclear fuel carries about 1 million times the energy as a pound of fossil

fuel” (The Differences). This difference alone showcases which energy is better. Fossil fuels

depend on burning, “…a fossil-fueled power plant relies on the ancient technology of fire to

produce heat; such plants burn hydrocarbon fuels such as methane or pulverized coal” (The

Differences). This burning effect causes much of the greenhouse gases that are accused of

starting climate change. Nuclear energy avoids this altogether because it produces steam which is

not hurtful to the earth. “We conclude that nuclear energy…needs to be… significantly

Show More
Related
695 Words | 3 Pages

Facts, data, expert opinion: a) Low Pollution such as air pollution, water pollution - Nuclear power also has a lot fewer greenhouse emissions. It has been determined that the amount of greenhouse gases have decreased by almost half because of the prevalence in the utilization of nuclear power. Nuclear energy has the least effect on nature since it doesn’t discharge any gasses like methane and carbon dioxide b) Low Operating Costs - The cost of the uranium, which is utilized as a fuel in this process, is low. Also, even though the expense of setting up nuclear power plants is moderately high, the expense of running them is quite low. The normal life of nuclear reactor is anywhere from 40-60 years, depending on how often it is used and how it is being

Read More
824 Words | 4 Pages

Over 20 percent of the energy in the United States comes from nuclear energy power plants. (Rinkesh, 2018) They so their best to get as much energy to the country as possible, but there are those out there who don’t agree with them. While there are downsides to nuclear energy, the pros vastly outweigh the cons. Nuclear power plants are a great way to get energy because they don’t let out much pollution, are very efficient, and are very safe.

Read More
607 Words | 3 Pages

Nuclear power produces fewer carbon emissions than traditional energy sources because energy is not produced by burning molecules but splitting atoms. ‘An energy mix including nuclear power has the lowest impact on wildlife and Ecosystems’ as shown by a Conservation Biology paper. Consequently, greenhouse gas emissions have reduced by nearly half which shows the benefits and popularity of nuclear power use. Nuclear power has many environmental benefits such as small waste production, leaves no adverse effect on water, land or any habitats. By reducing fossil fuel consumption and switching to Nuclear Energy, we will sustain the environment, quality of air, improving the overall quality of

Read More
1117 Words | 5 Pages

They are having second thoughts. In addition, the costly price of nuclear power plants and nuclear inflexibilty, meaning it has slow start up and shutdown hours. Finally, as I mentioned before, nuclear waste, a very hazardous

Read More
802 Words | 4 Pages

Accessed 22 Jan. 2018. This article makes several statements on why nuclear energy is more efficient than our regular fossil fuel energy. It states that if citizens want to have clean air and reduce the amount of carbon emissions making our nuclear program stronger and bigger than it is now should be everyone's goal. This articles information is directly from the New York Times paper. The article also used information from multiple government and federal established organizations.

Read More
1785 Words | 8 Pages

This is evident in Figure … where an equivalent amount of energy is given, the nuclear energy is able to sustain power up to years, where normal fossil fuel can only sustain up to a few days. Although there are debates that the life span of nuclear power sources such as Uranium is low and is comparable to oil, this do not pose a threat as nuclear energy can be recycled. In addition, nuclear power plant only emits hot water into the environment which makes it environmental friendly. In fact, little or almost no carbon dioxide is being released into the atmosphere.

Read More
219 Words | 1 Pages

The second most common energy source in US is nuclear power, after fossil fuels. What is nuclear power? Nuclear power is the use of nuclear reactions that release nuclear energy to generate heat which is used mostly in steam turbines to give us energy in a nuclear power plant. About 10% of US's electricity comes from nuclear power, but in some countries, like Germany, closed down all their nuclear power plants because people didn’t like the idea of it. But the real problem is that if the nuclear power runs well, it is very safe.

Read More
1587 Words | 7 Pages

In 2016, Nuclear energy produced 94,748,858 kilowatts of electric power. This power by itself would be enough to fully power 77 million homes for over a year. Considering the puny American fleet of one hundred power plants, this is no small feat. Since 1979, the size of the American nuclear program has shrunk considerably, with the prospect of ordering new plants a far off concept to American bureaucrats and corporate officials. Yet, the industry was not always negative.

Read More
769 Words | 4 Pages

Lastly, nuclear power is a very viable source of alternative energy because it’s much more affordable then fossil fuels. A big problem with power in our time is that it is very expensive. With nuclear power we can get more energy out of fewer materials which will in turn save money. Douglas Gregory states, “One uranium fuel pellet – typically measuring about 0.3-inch diameter by 0.5-inch long—can produce the equivalent energy of 17,000 cubic feet of natural gas, 1,780 pounds of coal, or 149 gallons of oil.” (The Use of Nuclear Power Should Be Increased).

Read More
573 Words | 3 Pages

At the present time, nuclear power is the cleanest energy source compared to coal, oil, and natural gas. To be sure, Nuclear power is a power that does not emit greenhouse gases, which destroy the atmosphere. Notably, It is important to notice that if handled in the proper way, nuclear power can be a reliable, low polluting source of energy that is worthier than the leading fuels. Further more, the cost of constructing nuclear plants is staggering, A point to remember is that the cost of uranium is considerably low being compared to other fuels that are in account.

Read More
770 Words | 4 Pages

If we had that many nuclear power plants that would create almost 4500 KWh of energy a year which is three times as much as coal produces per year with all those power plants. Most people reject what nuclear energy power brings to the United States because of the risks that they think it brings. They do not fully realize what is in place to make this energy work in the best favor of the people. The United States should create more nuclear reactors because it creates more energy for cheaper, safer way to create energy than coal, and is a cleaner source of energy.

Read More
3678 Words | 15 Pages

Nuclear energy may be the solution that eliminates our concern for energy production in the future, but it still remains a huge issue for the environment. Despite its wide use in many developed countries, nuclear energy poses many threats to both the

Read More
960 Words | 4 Pages

Nuclear Power Garrett, Hammill English 8 Will there ever be a solution to the energy demand around the world? According to the Department of Energy there are 7 different ways electricity is generated. Only four of them use renewable fuel sources, one of which goes beyond and contributes to the medical field. Nuclear power well keep up with the demands for power, while having safe disposal options, and good creation of jobs.

Read More
767 Words | 4 Pages

Amongst all the various forms of energy for power generation (coal, natural gas, renewables and etc.), Nuclear power holds the key to keeping the US and in the long run, the world running. With premium productivity, nominal safety issues and its economic nature, nuclear energy will meet the demands for power in America and the world as a whole. The IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) additionally embraced atomic power as a key lighten innovation that is right now accessible.. The energy produced from one kilogram of uranium is equal to that of over 10,000 gallons of oil or over 45,000 pounds of coal. The high energy output and low waste production makes Nuclear power’s one of the best energy sources in use.

Read More
944 Words | 4 Pages

Nuclear energy is something that we`ve all heard about. It carries risk and potential. When an atom (Uranium and Plutonium in nuclear power plants) is bombarded by neutrons, it can be split, causing fission. This fission releases more neutrons, which causes a chain reaction. Nuclear power plants use this use the heat that is created by fission to heat water that spins their turbines (“Nuclear Energy”).

Read More

More about Should The United States Switch To Nuclear Energy Essay

Related Topics

Open Document