In the 2nd Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, it states the right to bear arms.
More Gun Control Laws would cause a greater outrage for a big part of the population.
Creating more laws means less freedom to the people.
The protection that the guns ensure, the freedom, and the fact that guns are used in recreational activity shows that taking guns away from the U.S people would affect how they live their lives.
Gun Control Laws are ineffective and irrelevant and there is no reason to create more than the existing.
When the 2nd Amendment of the Constitution was being written, it was meant for protection of the people in 1791, yet 227 years later the same applies to the people.
Many understand the risks and the potential “evil” that come
…show more content…
Creating stricter gun laws would make it harder for the American Citizen to continue to follow all the laws and would also lose that sense of protection that the gun ensures.
As people of the United States freedom is something that is very important because this country was created to be free.
It is understandable that many want to create stricter gun laws of the fact of all the recent massacres because of guns.
Gun Control does not solve the problem, in this case, this would just make more people refer to buying illegal weapons instead because there would involve too much work to do it legally.
Many argue that if in the Las Vegas Massacre, he would not have had all those weapons then the people would have been safe.
This might be true to an extent because if he didn’t have the access to the weapons what would have stopped him from creating a bomb which would have been far worse and would have created a greater destruction.
People want to be free, and sadly if a person wants to create mayhem and harm all they need is the weapon if not a gun what is to stop them from using a car or a