ipl-logo

The United States Should Not Ad Stricter Gun Control Laws

1121 Words5 Pages

The United States should not add stricter gun laws because Guns are used to protect people,guns are used for hunting,and the guns are not the problem the people using them are the problem. If guns were in the right hands then there would be no reason to ban them. The United States should not add stricter gun laws because gun are used to protect other people. People use guns to protect themselves from bad people trying to kill them. As an example, someone walks into someones house and tries to kill that person, if there are stricter gun laws then you might not be able to shoot back at them. Also guns should not have stricter laws because they are used for hunting. There are thousands of hunters across the United States that would be very upset …show more content…

Sometimes people carrying a gun or handling a gun might not have enough knowledge to use the firearm or even know how to carry it. Also some people might have stuff running through their head while holding the weapon which makes it very dangerous for the people around that very. Most of school shootings,the shooter has had a rough life or has been depressed so this will make them have different thoughts which can turn into harming other people. Also, if there were stricter laws on the people using the gun and not just the gun then most of the school shootings that have happened in the passed years would have never happened since the people should not have the gun because they are not stable enough. Secondly,most people even if they can not get a gun they will easily just steal it. Banning guns will not do anything except make people steal more to get a gun which will just cause more problems. Also making stricter gun laws will also include police officers which will give them a disadvantage if they have no gun or have new rules while using the weapon. Therefore if the government were blaming the people using the guns more than the guns,there would be less school shootings since most of them have depression or a disability of some sort. If those people could get help before they take action then maybe the actions they are thinking about doing would not

Show More
Related
1242 Words | 5 Pages

Mental Health is a bigger issue than guns, and mental health will be regulated and not guns if the authority and the government want killings to stop occurring. Taking away guns will not stop killings with guns. People will find other ways to kill people, because people if they want to kill, will kill. Some argue that the guns need to be taken away because guns take away Innocent people’s lives. However, the real reason people are killed by guns is that of the people using the gun.

Read More
1710 Words | 7 Pages

Recent events would say that the government needs to have these stricter gun laws in order to protect the public. However, critics believe this would only put the public in more danger. Putting stricter laws on guns would only prevent innocent civilians from obtaining fire arms, not the criminals. For instance, America has outlawed the use of drugs, but yet drug issues are still a problem today. Criminals will still be able to access guns, and banning them would only prevent people from protecting themselves from these criminals.

Read More
915 Words | 4 Pages

Gun control is what restricts people from buying and using guns, but these laws are not strengthened at the extent they need to be strengthened. This leads to many people getting these guns and using them to cause mass shootings all over the U.S. For example, according to the Council on Foreign Relationship, a news article that covers major world issues, in 2017, mass shootings at a music festival in Las Vegas and at a church near San Antonio have rekindled the gun control debate (“U.S. Gun Policy: Global Comparisons”). The fact that gun control is still not tightened is a huge margin and error, and still causes mass shootings as we just covered. Many people have said that we should not allow guns to be purchased, which would seem like the logical option. However, according to the same source, Council on Foreign Relationship, some states, such as Idaho, Alaska, and Kansas, have passed various laws attempting to nullify

Read More
1537 Words | 7 Pages

Stricter gun control laws would ensure guns do not fall in the hands of people who would misuse them. For example, individuals who are 21-years-old and below should not be given the right to own or be around guns. For if they are not allowed to legally drink alcohol, how can they be trusted with a weapon that can easily take a life within seconds.

Read More
1126 Words | 5 Pages

Gun control is unnecessary because guns are the cause of death in relatively few violent crimes, gun control takes our rights away, and gun control had proven not to work in places such as the U.K. and Australia where guns are either banned or gun control is strict. First of all, guns are used in a relatively small amount of violent crimes out of all the crimes that occur. Statistics show that guns are the 12th leading cause of death, "Between 1999 and 2013, Americans were 21.5 times more likely to die of heart disease (9,691,733 deaths); 18.7 times more likely to die of malignant tumors (8,458,868 deaths); and 2.4 times more likely to die of diabetes or 2.3 times more likely to die of Alzheimer's (1,080,298 and 1,053,207 respectively) than to die from a firearm (whether by accident, homicide, or suicide)" (CDC). The statistics show that guns are not as dangerous as people think. Even if guns were made difficult to obtain, no matter what criminals will find a way to obtain guns illegally without a license.

Read More
435 Words | 2 Pages

Gun control has been a concern of the government almost as long as the second amendment has been around. It states “ A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” The United States wanting to put a law on gun control contradicts the II Amendment by not guaranteeing people a way to protect themselves. I find this to be detrimental to a person's safety especially when crime rates are high in many cities. We should be allowed to protect ourselves and families against the criminal element.

Read More
747 Words | 3 Pages

People carrying firearms would keep the crime down also. Also a gun can keep people from breaking into your house stealing stuff and harming you. Also people carrying guns keep the crime down so places don't get robbed.also the second amendment is means ‘’the right of bare arms shall not be infringed’’.which means our firearms cannot take them.i also think some of the gun control laws are not good. They also need to just run background checks and see if the are okay to buy a firearm. crime is not the only issue related to firearms ownership.

Read More
1700 Words | 7 Pages

In the past, the major gun control legislations that have been put into effect have not stopped people from obtaining firearms (Gun Control.) There have also been cases in the past where cities have attempted to ban handguns. After the ban was put into effect, murder rates tended to rise instead of drop, unlike what most people might assume. Crime rates and violence also skyrocketed after the bans were put into effect. Another problem with taking guns away, or banning them, is that the government cannot expect everyone to abide by the laws.

Read More
496 Words | 2 Pages

First off if Trump somehow lets that law pass, the government will get sued thousands of times until the law is declared unconstitutional. Also banning guns would make shooting a lot more likely if someone wants to commit a shooting their not going to worry about if them having a gun is legal or not. It would make them more likely because the shooter does not have to worry about someone with a CCL (concealed carry license). Banning all guns would also mean one very bad thing, no hunting. For a lot of people, hunting is the favorite thing to do, maybe even their jobs.

Read More
342 Words | 2 Pages

Although gun control in some states does lower gun deaths, it does not deter gun crime. Gun control would take away safety and a way to protect yourself. More gun laws are not needed because of how

Read More
1115 Words | 5 Pages

Guns go a long way in terms of protection so banning them completely isn’t going to fix the problem completely. On the other hand, if we don 't do anything about the loose restrictions on purchasing and operating

Read More
179 Words | 1 Pages

Stricter gun control should be important to everybody in our country. Guns is dangerous for our community. People need to be aware and educate of the danger of gun, so they can operate a gun safety. There are already a lot of gun in our country. There are people killing other people and themselves with guns.

Read More
1292 Words | 6 Pages

Some people argue that they are used for self-protection and having fun going to shooting ranges and hunting, but these fun things aren 't worth the price of human life. Having stricter gun control laws can save the lives of many Americans. We should adopt stricter gun laws in the U.S. to stop these unnecessary deaths. To begin, there have been many mass murder that have occured during these last few years, and the numbers are just increasing.

Read More
152 Words | 1 Pages

Guns should be allowed in America for multiple reasons. These include: it is the second amendment. The founding fathers believed that each citizen of the United States deserves rights. Therefore, the 'fathers ' wanted each individual to legally own a gun for purposes of protection. In addition to this, in regards to authorities it acts as a problem for them.

Read More
1097 Words | 5 Pages

Should semi-automatic guns be banned? Some people agree and others disagree. The main reason some people believe that they should be banned is because they’re the weapon that’s used in most mass shootings across the US which kills hundreds of people each year. Others disagree on them being banned because we have the rights to own guns and that guns aren’t the problem, people are. Shootings using semi-automatic guns only make up a small percentage of the gun deaths in the US.

Read More

More about The United States Should Not Ad Stricter Gun Control Laws

Open Document