For a long time schools have been debating whether or not sports should be a part of everyday programs. According to some districts that decided to make the switch, it became apparent that athletic activities have a negative effect on academic performance. Therefore, schools should dispose of sports because districts could save major amounts of money, students can focus more on education, and it can allow large amounts of extra time.
As athletic equipment isn’t free, not buying it could result in better education material for classrooms and teachers. According to Amanda Ripley, in 2012 a solo school district in Premont, Texas was threatened to shut down due to financial problems and academic failure, but they made the decision to end all sports and that resulted in them saving $150,000 in one year (10). More specifically, new bleachers could go for a half a millions dollars, maintaining grass fields could cost $20,000 and overall districts pay large amounts of money to keep sports in the schools (Ripley 11). This data shows that money is no minor problem, schools use up enormous amounts of cash that can limit their opportunity to use it for other resources, people of the district should look into it so, better material could be invested upon. This information is
…show more content…
Ripley found that America lags behind other countries academically, with more than twenty other nations having higher graduation rates (10). She goes on to say how during a sports season the focus switches, players would be training and practicing for long hours, no longer having their attention towards school and its work (Ripley 11). This supports the idea that schools are too invested in sports and not spending enough time on a student’s education, ruining futures for thousands. It is clear that focusing on education is critical for those who seek to do well in