I think that if the school cut all the sports programs that everyone who plays them would get really mad. And not only the players would be mad but the fans and people that like to watch them would also be very upset. This is why I would be for it because the players already whine enough but if they got there sports taken away we would never here the end of it. So that and also the money made for the sports program alone makes most of our schools money from people paying to get into the games. Some of the other reasons that the school should not cut the sports program is that’s how the school makes most of its money and they can’t save if they don’t have money coming in.
Sports like Golf, Tennis, and soccer that will have less money will get cut. Fans of those sports will not be happy and the school could possibly lose a lot of money. College athletes should not be getting paid because it will put strain on the financial part of the school. In an article called, Why College Athletes shouldn’t be Paid, in JobsinSports.com, it says,”If universities were to pay college athletes, they’d likely have to divert funds from other vital programs and services, ultimately impacting the quality of education and resources available to non-athletes students. Imagine a scenario where a school has to pick between paying scholarships to non-athlete students or pay for their sports players.
Rodney D. Fort explains that: Many people have an aversion to paying college athletes for their services, but an examination of various principles of economics show that paying athletes makes sense and would make the college sports system more efficient in the way it distributes money. Players would receive more of the revenues they produce while pay would be cut for administrators and other employees in the athletic departments. (Fort 10) Many sports followers wonder where the money would come from if athletes would get paid. They think college athletic departments barely break even but their is some confusion. Fort stated, “Universities allow athletic departments to keep all excess revenues on an updated basis during any given budget period.
These schools also spend six times as much money per athlete than for students. This is not fair to students that are paying to attend a certain university because they are not receiving the full value and benefits that school could offer. Although some people argue that sports bring in donations from boosters and increased applications, cutting just a fraction of the costs of sports would free up thousands of dollars that could be put back into scholarships for students, reducing student
Imagine earning a football scholarship from a large, in-state university. It’s the first day of school and you’re excited for the season to start. Weeks pass, practices go by, and you notice that you’ve been working harder than most college students, juggling classes, practices and workouts, and a minimum wage job to be able to eat and buy necessary items. You find yourself struggling to keep your grades up because practices and your job are taking up time you could be using to study and prepare for some tests.
Schools have been providing sports for years, and had students enjoying them with their families and friends. According to many people they want to get rid of sports to focus on their academic skills than athletic skills to help them in the real world with businesses. Therefore, schools should shut down sports to cut down their bills, bring up teacher salaries, and have more educational programs to help them succeed in their business life. Although Schools are always trying to raise money for superior tools in class, it would help if the school closed down the athletics to gain more money for academic needs.
Imagine an atmosphere so tense that the very air seems to radiate stress, along with the smells of fresh food. You and the thousands of people surrounding you hold their breath in anticipation. Time seems to slow down. All of a sudden, everyone jumps up and erupts in cheers, clapping and hugging and high-fiving the people around them. Many people have experienced this sort of atmosphere before as a spectator of a college sports game or match.
The NCAA receives nearly 11 billion dollars annually from college sports. I think the NCAA could give a little money back to the people who are making them the money in the first place. The second reason is the athletes don’t have enough time to get jobs. Being a division one athlete is a full time job. During the season you are traveling all over the country and barely have enough time for homework especially not a job.
“During the season, they can end up putting in 50 hours a week at their sports” (Nocera). College athletes are putting in numerous hours each week but at the end of the week they still do not get a paycheck. In the USA Today magazine Stanley Eitzen says that “The athletes (slaves) are exploited economically, making millions for their masters, but provided only with a subsistence wage of room, tuition and books” (Eitzen). So if college athletes are putting in this much work and making this much money for their schools than college athletes should be paid. First athletes make the schools a large amount of money, but still do not get paid.
The NCAA should pay its athletes to compensate for the student athletes’ time and efforts, due to the hours they put in for their school, the class time they are deprived of, and the absurd amount of money the NCAA makes off of the athletes. This argument that i introduced and i will be arguing in favor of is very complex, but i believe there is a solution and this change should be implemented. My first point is that athletes are working more than the working man and aren't getting paid for their time. ” On average per week, student athletes spend these hours on their sport: Baseball 42.1, Basketball 39.2, Football (FBS) 43.3, Football (FCS) 41.6, Other sports 32.0” (CBS News). In comparison, the average work week in america is 40 hours.
(Hook) How would you feel if you worked hours making your company millions of dollars and they didn’t pay you? (Bridge) Many student athletes spend as much time practicing and competing as people do working. Plus spend many hours going to class and studying. Athletes do not have time to get a part time like many student.
The million dollar question; should college athletes be paid? This is an immense debate, but if you were to ask me, I would say yes, college athletes should be paid. There are a plethora of reasons why college athletes should get paid. College athletes should get paid because of the amount of time they put into their sport, the amount of money everyone else is making off of them, and their overall importance to the school. There are a myriad of reasons that people can argue the opposite way, but, the reasons they should get paid definitely outweigh the reasons they shouldn’t get paid.
High School Sports Should be Funded Every year 300,000 students are participating in sports (Gould 1). The School District has been funding the athletics program, which has been benefiting many of the students’ lives for several years. The discontinuation of high school sports will cause many students to loose the health, social and educational benefits provided by participating in athletics. The School District should continue to fund sports because they benefit students.
Imagine a college freshman athlete making no money and going to class every day like a regular student. The next month they are drafted into the NBA and making millions of dollars. All of this happening without a college degree. They play a few weeks in the NBA and have a career ending injury. What happens next?
Paying College Athletes This essay I’m going to talk about paying college athletes and why we should pay them a little bit of money. I think we should pay college athletes a little bit of money. I have some facts and reasons why we should to back up reason why we should. Here are my facts and reasons to support my opinion about this topic.
