More handpicked essays just for you.
Should uniersities be allowed to pay student athletes
Should uniersities be allowed to pay student athletes
Should uniersities be allowed to pay student athletes
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Men’s football and basketball make the most money for college athletics. If they were to be paid based on the money brought in, a majority of the college athletic programs would become disabled due to lack of money. If a sport does not generate a large revenue, their athletes could be paid less. Do they cut the funding to those programs because a large part of the athletics budget goes to paying the larger programs? The NCAA already has a structure in place to keep the balance that could be caused by paying the college athletes.
Sports like Golf, Tennis, and soccer that will have less money will get cut. Fans of those sports will not be happy and the school could possibly lose a lot of money. College athletes should not be getting paid because it will put strain on the financial part of the school. In an article called, Why College Athletes shouldn’t be Paid, in JobsinSports.com, it says,”If universities were to pay college athletes, they’d likely have to divert funds from other vital programs and services, ultimately impacting the quality of education and resources available to non-athletes students. Imagine a scenario where a school has to pick between paying scholarships to non-athlete students or pay for their sports players.
Rodney D. Fort explains that: Many people have an aversion to paying college athletes for their services, but an examination of various principles of economics show that paying athletes makes sense and would make the college sports system more efficient in the way it distributes money. Players would receive more of the revenues they produce while pay would be cut for administrators and other employees in the athletic departments. (Fort 10) Many sports followers wonder where the money would come from if athletes would get paid. They think college athletic departments barely break even but their is some confusion. Fort stated, “Universities allow athletic departments to keep all excess revenues on an updated basis during any given budget period.
These schools also spend six times as much money per athlete than for students. This is not fair to students that are paying to attend a certain university because they are not receiving the full value and benefits that school could offer. Although some people argue that sports bring in donations from boosters and increased applications, cutting just a fraction of the costs of sports would free up thousands of dollars that could be put back into scholarships for students, reducing student
Imagine an atmosphere so tense that the very air seems to radiate stress, along with the smells of fresh food. You and the thousands of people surrounding you hold their breath in anticipation. Time seems to slow down. All of a sudden, everyone jumps up and erupts in cheers, clapping and hugging and high-fiving the people around them. Many people have experienced this sort of atmosphere before as a spectator of a college sports game or match.
The NCAA receives nearly 11 billion dollars annually from college sports. I think the NCAA could give a little money back to the people who are making them the money in the first place. The second reason is the athletes don’t have enough time to get jobs. Being a division one athlete is a full time job. During the season you are traveling all over the country and barely have enough time for homework especially not a job.
“During the season, they can end up putting in 50 hours a week at their sports” (Nocera). College athletes are putting in numerous hours each week but at the end of the week they still do not get a paycheck. In the USA Today magazine Stanley Eitzen says that “The athletes (slaves) are exploited economically, making millions for their masters, but provided only with a subsistence wage of room, tuition and books” (Eitzen). So if college athletes are putting in this much work and making this much money for their schools than college athletes should be paid. First athletes make the schools a large amount of money, but still do not get paid.
The NCAA should pay its athletes to compensate for the student athletes’ time and efforts, due to the hours they put in for their school, the class time they are deprived of, and the absurd amount of money the NCAA makes off of the athletes. This argument that i introduced and i will be arguing in favor of is very complex, but i believe there is a solution and this change should be implemented. My first point is that athletes are working more than the working man and aren't getting paid for their time. ” On average per week, student athletes spend these hours on their sport: Baseball 42.1, Basketball 39.2, Football (FBS) 43.3, Football (FCS) 41.6, Other sports 32.0” (CBS News). In comparison, the average work week in america is 40 hours.
The million dollar question; should college athletes be paid? This is an immense debate, but if you were to ask me, I would say yes, college athletes should be paid. There are a plethora of reasons why college athletes should get paid. College athletes should get paid because of the amount of time they put into their sport, the amount of money everyone else is making off of them, and their overall importance to the school. There are a myriad of reasons that people can argue the opposite way, but, the reasons they should get paid definitely outweigh the reasons they shouldn’t get paid.
High School Sports Should be Funded Every year 300,000 students are participating in sports (Gould 1). The School District has been funding the athletics program, which has been benefiting many of the students’ lives for several years. The discontinuation of high school sports will cause many students to loose the health, social and educational benefits provided by participating in athletics. The School District should continue to fund sports because they benefit students.
Imagine a college freshman athlete making no money and going to class every day like a regular student. The next month they are drafted into the NBA and making millions of dollars. All of this happening without a college degree. They play a few weeks in the NBA and have a career ending injury. What happens next?
Paying College Athletes This essay I’m going to talk about paying college athletes and why we should pay them a little bit of money. I think we should pay college athletes a little bit of money. I have some facts and reasons why we should to back up reason why we should. Here are my facts and reasons to support my opinion about this topic.
A growing debate in the National Collegiate Athletic Association is whether or not student athletes should be paid. The controversy began in 2011 after three hundred coaches and athletes signed a petition to pay college-level athletes, and since then other athletes have made several more arguments. The NCAA has rightfully denied all of the requests, saying they include too much. To pay student athletes could be hugely expensive for colleges, especially because they would not only pay for each athlete’s degree and equipment, but also provide a salary and give bonuses revenue for tournaments. Moreover, college athletes should not be paid because there is not enough money, it takes away a student’s focus from schoolwork, and not every athlete is guaranteed a professional career after graduating; however it is argued that it they are already paid in a way.
(Hook) How would you feel if you worked hours making your company millions of dollars and they didn’t pay you? (Bridge) Many student athletes spend as much time practicing and competing as people do working. Plus spend many hours going to class and studying. Athletes do not have time to get a part time like many student.
The suppression of the non-medical usage of psychoactive goods through taxation has existed in both Western and non-Western societies since at least the 17th century. Despite their controversial nature and varying levels of successes, they have become a mainstay of modern Western society. David Courtwright, in his 2001 book Forces of Habit, underlines the fact that taxation and control do not occur merely by policies shaped by domestic concerns and stakeholders in isolation from the wider world – especially not in today’s globalised world with rapid communication and easy transportation. The so-called “cross-border effect” is one of these external forces that embodies the challenges that both national and regional governments face in the
