ipl-logo

Arguments Against Affirmative Action

568 Words3 Pages

Explain the arguments for and against Affirmative Action

According to the article ''Top 10 reasons Affirmative Action Should Be Eliminated" some of the arguments against Affirmative Action are affirmative action leads to reverse discrimination, It rewards wrong people, It encourages people to seek easier access rather than work hard.

Affirmative action leads to reverse discrimination

Affirmative action was created to end discrimination and gives everybody equal opportunities, but some feel that affirmative action does the opposite. Many white students despite having excellent grades and being more qualified, white students still have a difficult time getting into institutions because institutions favor the minorities. The article uses the …show more content…

The article uses the example of the unqualified students who get into college because admission standards have been lowered for them. As well as unskilled workers who get hired simply because they are black or Hispanics. The article states that not all minorities will take advantage of that situation, but some will use the "minority" status to get ahead in life.

It encourages people to seek easy access rather than work hard

Affirmative action no longer helps the underprivileged society and is the reason why critics want to get rid of it. As already mentioned in the article minorities are already taking advantage of their status in order to get benefits and get things the easy way.

The arguments for affirmative action

Affirmative action allows for fair evaluation of candidates by making up for the inequalities minorities face. The purpose of affirmative action is to increase the admission rates of minorities that are under-represented in America’s colleges.

A diverse student body creates a better learning environment. A large amount of learning in college comes from sources other than textbooks and

Show More
Related
322 Words | 2 Pages

The main purpose of Affirmative Action is to put an end to discrimination towards the minorities. Although black citizens were put towards a disadvantage in society with the assistance of Affirmative Action was reversed back towards white citizens. When racials practice that have historically have placed blacks at a disadvantage are removed that is when whites believe that preferential treatment is given back to the blacks. Hill also argues that there needs to be some changes in the labor

Read More
423 Words | 2 Pages

In the same way, I think that affirmative action does have its setbacks as well as advantages. However, my position on affirmative action is that I stand against affirmative action on education. [unfair] One reasoen to be against affirmative action is because it does not leave people with the fair advantage such as the minority. Let us say that someone has 12 cupcakes and 6 of them are reserved for the non-minority. The six of the non-minority has already took the last of the 6 cupcakes and.

Read More
1028 Words | 5 Pages

Minorities have had far from an easy ride in life especially in America. The past policies of America to segregate individuals by law and press them by the practice of “redlining” may no longer be around, but both policies have left traces of their effects in American society even decades later. The American public is often oblivious to their own actions of segregating people in their lives and oblivious to the obvious reasons for the large minority population in the lower class. Once Americans can take responsibility for their actions and actual follow their own words of equality America can become a country that minorities and non minorities can be proud to live

Read More
499 Words | 2 Pages

Affirmative action is a tool that is used to ensure that minority groups are granted equal opportunity. Whether it be college admissions, or in the workplace, affirmative action makes it possible for all people to enjoy the same opportunities despite skin color, gender, or nationality. Affirmative action was started by President John F. Kennedy. President Kennedy started affirmative action to make sure that during the hiring process, and also during employment, that all employees were treated the same, despite their race or nationality. Thereafter, President Lyndon B. Johnson followed up by making it a requirement for government to hire without counting race, religion, nationality, or gender against applicants.

Read More
845 Words | 4 Pages

Implying that this only discourages minorities and puts them in situations where they can not reach their full potential. Both arguments make very good points, yet they seem to miss the big picture, which is that the benefits of affirmative action outweigh the downsides

Read More
1480 Words | 6 Pages

Since the very group of words “affirmative action” is in total contradiction with the amendment fourteen which guarantees people equal protection under the law. But coming to affirmative action, we have to remark the sad history behind it, which is once again to disadvantage a group for another one. Therefore we can clearly say that affirmative action is not only illegal but it is also unconstitutional since it violates clearly the fourteenth amendment. Not only that, we need also to notice that affirmative action goes against this American ideal which is equal opportunity, the ability for someone to use whatever wealth and/or talent he/she has to reach his/her fullest potential. Due to affirmative action, we will notice down in the paper how affirmative action prevents people to use their fullest

Read More
513 Words | 3 Pages

Is the Affirmative Action policy, a policy to not continue because of its benefits for people of different race or culture, or not to continue do to the reverse discrimination of all parties present? Due to the Affirmative Action policy people may over abused that power in work or schooling places to their advantage. This policy is a grantee to give advantages for those who need the education or occupation. These advantages to whom would need is unnecessary because is a minority we would assume that they possible need help with applying to work or schooling.

Read More
208 Words | 1 Pages

What’s astounding about the reverse racism argument is the way in which it reveals some racists’ deep need to deny the idea of having any privilege. Rather than acknowledging the realities of how people of color deal with racism, white racists do mental and hypothetical cartwheels in order to justify these injustices. There have been so many explainers on why the concept of reverse racism is inherently wrong, so many breakdowns, but perhaps another way to tackle this discussion is to address some of the main topics and issues that get called out as reverse racism. Here are four common arguments that have no merit: 1. Affirmative Action takes jobs and scholarships away from white people.

Read More
530 Words | 3 Pages

The purpose of affirmative action was to create a fairness to all applicants. It has created an unfair

Read More
438 Words | 2 Pages

I would choose the first argument as a better and more persuasive argument for affirmative action because it creates a more safe, well balanced and fair society where the majority of the people searching for employment feel they are included. 3. At some publicly funded universities, scholarships are, in essence, set aside for minorities. Google privately funds scholarships that are, in essence, set aside for minorities. Taxpayers, in other words, fund one affirmative action endeavor and private investors the other.

Read More
365 Words | 2 Pages

Affirmative action is guaranteeing the civil rights of designated groups of people by taking positive action. Justice William J. Brennan jr. said once that it is to protect these groups of people from “The lingering effects of pervasive discrimination.” Affirmative action really started growing after the case of BROWN v. BOARD OF EDUCATION. Even after a decade after Brown, there was still very little change. Therefore legislatures and business executives mandated positive actions to be appropriated to integrate schools.

Read More
1011 Words | 5 Pages

The fear is that without this policy, diversity will not always happen if left up to chance. It is true that schools and other organizations have discriminated against women and people of other race. This problem created an unfair advantage for males of the superior race. Supporters also charge that without affirmative action African Americans would have a more difficult process of being admitted into prestigious and predominately white universities (Hopkins, 2010). Affirmative Action allows minorities to reflect different areas of study and work that otherwise would have never been considered.

Read More
199 Words | 1 Pages

There are two components to the implication of nursing professionalization which are: Compatible and incompatible. The compatible consequences are: • The seriousness of the conduct. • Improvement of patient care quality and betterment of the outcomes of care. • Satisfaction of staffs, customers, clients, and agencies. • Enhancement of the professional authority and give them the power to make decisions, • Development of training programs to better educational efficiency, reduced accidents and mistakes and having improved risk management.

Read More
1028 Words | 5 Pages

Weak affirmative action which is just an effort to ensure that all qualified minority groups are considered whereas the strong one is when some sort of preference is given to the minority candidate. Later the author concludes that he will focus on the strong affirmative action because it is the most controversial one. Then the author gives us many arguments of different people and critics for and against affirmative action. Later on, David Boonin gives us his own arguments in favor of affirmative action which are 1) the unfair disadvantage argument; 2) the (other) compensation argument; 3) the appeal to diversity; 4) the need for role models; 5) the bias-elimination argument; 6) race as a qualification. “I conclude that while affirmative action may prove to have some desirable features and some beneficial consequences, there’s no reason to believe that it’s morally obligatory.

Read More
1734 Words | 7 Pages

Throughout many of the affirmative action legal cases, one of the main arguments from proponents is that it is necessary in order to right the wrongs of past racial discrimination. Some say that affirmative action is justified because even though white applicants may be more qualified, this is only because they did not face the same hardships as their minority counterparts (Rachels, Ethics, 1973).  Many argue if we do not integrate disadvantaged minorities into mainstream social institutions, they will continue to suffer the discrimination that has plagued our country for centuries and that this is detrimental to not only the minorities but also society as a whole (Anderson, 2002, 1270–71). However, the debate has recently shifted to the benefits of diversity in the classroom which the Supreme Court has affirmed as being a positive thing

Read More

More about Arguments Against Affirmative Action

Related Topics

Open Document