ipl-logo

Arguments Against Animal Testing

793 Words4 Pages

If animals feel pain the same way humans do, why do we test on them, but reject the idea of testing on other people? The simple fact is, animal testing, no matter what it’s for, is inhumane. The case of animal testing is either overlooked or not being pushed hard enough. The controversy surrounding animal testing includes; the harming done to the animals’, supplementary forms that could/ should replace almost all animal testing, and why we shouldn’t use animals to test drugs because they differ from us genetically. Using companion animals to test our medical differences is completely absurd. People shouldn’t have the right to use other living forms for their own “good”. Whether we have or haven't cured many medical conditions using animals, …show more content…

“ Animals and humans biologically differ from each other. So the results from animal experiments can’t be applied accurately to humans” (Chang). “The human body- indeed most living systems- is extremely complex. This is why animals are not good models for human medicine. Humans differ from animals anatomically, genetically, and metabolically, meaning information from animals can’t be compared to humans accurately” (Pycroft).“ Even genetically modified, there isn’t a single animal model that can copy the complex human structure” (Pycroft). Since humans have such complex living systems is it safe to test drugs on these animals, knowing it could have a completely different reaction to humans. “We differ on the cellular and molecular level, which is where ideas occurs” later the article states “ Animal and human biological systems are different. Their reactions not just to chemicals being tested, but also food, can be very different.” (Burnett) Is really safe to put drugs, among other things, on the shelves knowing it could be extremely dangerous or cause side effects? We know it’s definitely not safe for the animals during, or after these

Show More
Related
887 Words | 4 Pages

According to one of the largest organizations for social change with 4.3 million members: Do Something, the article “11 Facts About Animal Testing” states, “92% of experimental drugs that are safe and effective in animals fail in human clinical trials because they are too dangerous or don’t work.” Even after scientists force innocent animals into excruciating pain, the results are proven to be meaningless. This delineates how impractical animal testing is. By the same token, according to Pro-Con, a nonprofit public charity that provides research on more than 50 controversial topics, “Paul Furlong, Professor of Clinical Neuroimaging at Aston University (UK), states that ‘it's very hard to create an animal model that even equates closely to what we're trying to achieve in the human.’” This demonstrates how distinct animals and humans are and proves we should not use animals as a representation people.

Read More
520 Words | 3 Pages

The testing of animals is very

Read More
1158 Words | 5 Pages

This passage shows us that animals rights need to be taken into consideration before we derive them of their basic rights. Animals should be allowed rights, especially when they are being cruelly tested for things that don’t even benefit humans. The Royal Journal of Medicine clarifies this, “Most experiments on animals are not relevant to human health, they do not contribute meaningfully to medical advances, and many are undertaken simply out of curiosity and do not even pretend to hold promise for curing illnesses”( the royal journal of medicine). Animal testing for useful information is a bad thing in itself; however, cruelly testing animals for just one's own curiosity is unacceptable. This information supports why animals need rights, so they don’t have to be put through such cruel

Read More
1111 Words | 5 Pages

Although the experimentation of animals has furthered medical knowledge, it should not be allowed because it is brutal and animals are unable to give their approval. In order to do a study on humans it must be authorized by them, where animals are unable to give consent, which strikes questions in the world of science on whether this is morally acceptable. Although animal experimentation can result in saving the lives of millions, many find it to be cruel and unjust. Seeing as animals are unable to speak for themselves, they are still able to express their emotions through their behavior.

Read More
487 Words | 2 Pages

Humans, as a species, have grown over time to believe that being more developed means being more superior. A statement such as that couldn’t be more false. All living creatures who can feel pain should not be subjected to that. Where do moral obligations lie? Is there even a significant difference between testing on animals and testing on humans?

Read More
1280 Words | 6 Pages

In addition, the majority of humans eat animal based food such as meat products regularly however; this is not called “cruel” by the people who make arguments against animal testing in the labs. Without animal testing in scientific research, there might be no other alternative means of testing a medical substance because the lives of human beings are more vital than the lives of animals. Medical research that involved animal testing has dramatically improved the human health and wellness (Kilkenny, et al. 2010). For example, animal testing has made possible the cure for polio that would have not been possible without animal testing. However, the criticisms of the people who are against animal testing believe that animal testing should be banned.

Read More
864 Words | 4 Pages

The harm animals undergo includes being infected with diseases they would not otherwise be susceptible to, electrocution, and having their spines crushed. This treatment that people are often unaware of is immoral, cruel, and unethical.

Read More
491 Words | 2 Pages

This is important because millions of animals are dying from this. “Before their deaths, some are forced to inhale toxic fumes, others are immobilized in restraint devices for hours, some have holes drilled into their skulls, and others have their skin burned off or their spinal cords crushed”. Said by the same article. This shows that they don’t just kill them they torture them. This is

Read More
709 Words | 3 Pages

According to Emanuel (1981), the human beings and animals whose have comparable organs and those function. It is known that chimpanzees and mice share about more than half of genes constitute with humans. Due to the same system of their body and biologically identical, the human and the animals would be having the same circumstances and disease. Therefore, the scientists would be gotten a possible and fruitful opinion in the human body or testing production by experimenting with

Read More
559 Words | 3 Pages

My opponent says.... Testing animals can help cure illnesses and diseases But we disagree…a lot of animals are different than us and dont have the same functions or organs. Because… some of the animals they use don't have have the same organs and function so when we start to use it on humans our bodies might react differently than the animals.

Read More
1651 Words | 7 Pages

Animal rights and experimentation has been a heated debate over the decade. Using animals for experiments date back to almost 400 years ago when William Harvey discovered how the blood circulates in bodies. Also, statistics have proven that in the past century, animal experiments have been in almost every major medical advancement according to the World Health Organization and United States Department of Health and Human Services(Scientific,2). Using animals for experimentation is not just important for research but this leads into curing complex diseases and illnesses. Not only do animals play an important role in research, but arguing that animals deserve the same rights as humans will ultimately hurt the advancement in medicine and will

Read More
796 Words | 4 Pages

Actually all testing and research done on animals should be under the control of government. The last and the most things is that it’s our responsibilities to take care of all the animals, even though they are just using for

Read More
1506 Words | 7 Pages

Drugs; an integral part in modern medicinal culture. Almost any problem can be solved with a simple pill, vitamin, or injection. However, with the usage of animals to test pharmaceuticals, there is no one hundred percent guarantee that a drug will work the same way in humans as it did in experimental trials (Shanks, R. Greek, and J. Greek 2). Unpredicted drug reactions and side effects is a big killer in the United States, taking 100,000 lives each year (Archibald 1). Yet, society abhors human testing.

Read More
967 Words | 4 Pages

Throughout moral, humanistic, and social perspectives animal testing is beneficial for medical evolution. Animals ' rights are of less moral worth than human rights. Humans are complex beings with large well developed brains, which form sizeable social groups, have significant ability to communicate with one another, and possess desires, preferences and interests about the world. Humans have an awareness of their own existence and mortality, and as such are beings worthy of moral consideration. According to Pycroft (2011), “Without access to live organisms we would know far less bout the function of the cardiovascular, how digestion works…

Read More
859 Words | 4 Pages

Science researches believe that products which have been tested on animals will make humans’ life better. However, the main concern on this issue is that animals are suffering from unnecessary pain. Animals are mostly exposed to radiation, forced to inhale poisonous gases and injected with harmful substances prior to the experiment. Thus, animal testing should be banned because it is cruel, the result is unreliable and expensive.

Read More

More about Arguments Against Animal Testing

Related Topics

Open Document