ipl-logo

Arguments Against Animal Testing

1175 Words5 Pages

Over the last decades animal testing has become a routine process in the medical industry. The national anti-vivisection society states that animal testing is widely used than any method in laboratories. This testing is not only use in medicine industry but also cosmetic industry. It is such a cruel experiment that there are people who are against using animals as subjects in laboratories even though it had been a method which is used for many years. It is inhumane and not necessary since there are alternative methods that can be substitute for animal.
Throughout century animal had been use as a subject for testing substances in laboratory. It is undeniable that animal experiments are significantly beneficial to medical care. Animal is an important …show more content…

(Bree Rodrigues, 2014) Animals should not be treated severely and suffering for the sake of a human's advantage. Suffering is unpleasing, whether it be in animals or humans. Tibor R. Machan states that “discriminating animals just because they do not have the cognitive ability is no more justifiable than discriminating against human beings with severe mental impairments.”: (Tibor 2012,5) Many species are used in the experiment but the most common are rats, rabbits, hamsters, birds, cats, dogs, and in some countries monkey is include. Humane Society International states that animals used in laboratory are generally forced to eat, forced to breathe chemical fume and injected into the muscle or burned to study the healing process and physical restraint. After the experiment is completed, animals are killed mostly by neck-breaking, inhaling carbon dioxide, or decapitation. Another cruel experiment is ‘Draize eye’ test use in cosmetics experiment to evaluate irritation and side effects of their beauty products. Rabbits are subjects in this experiment which their eyes are held open for more than twenty-four hours so that they cannot blink away the substances being tested. Due to a cruel experiment, there are people who against animal testing, for example, PETA which stand for People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals. It is a non-profit American animal rights organization which has over three million members and supporters. It is also the largest animal rights group in the world. Its motto is "animals are not ours to eat, wear, experiment on, use for entertainment or abuse in any way." Although most of medicines tested on animals are safe and effective to use on human, the unbearable process is way too savage to let it be used extensively. (NAVS.org,

Show More
Related
643 Words | 3 Pages

Animal Testing has been a very controversial topic for decades. Throughout history, animal testing has played a major role in leading to many new medicines and discoveries. Most of the world participates in these experiments, with the aims of achieving the most modern technologies. Animal testing needs to be continued to advance our science and medicines, and to continue to save millions of lives.

Read More
887 Words | 4 Pages

Pro-Con shares how animals are being treated in the Draize Acute Toxicity test. The supposed reason for this experiment is to see if there is irritation caused by shampoos or other cosmetic products. The test involves “…scientists using clips to hold a rabbit's eyelid open for multiple days, so they cannot blink when products are being tested” (Pro-Con). This barbaric process results in hemorrhaging and blindness. If humans would not think twice about putting their children in cages, infecting them with diseases and leaving them untreated, then they should not consider doing that to animals either.

Read More
268 Words | 2 Pages

II. Body A. Uses of animal testing 1) Education 2) Cosmetic research 3) Biomedical research B. Types of animals that used in laboratory and types of test 1) Mice and rats are the majority group: toxicity studies 2) Rabbits: eye irritancy

Read More
563 Words | 3 Pages

Animal testing has become a double-edged sword topic all around the world. Researchers believe that it is morally ethical to conduct extreme research procedures on animals when it is unethical to conduct on humans. Research is responsible for many medical breakthroughs and an important factor to the development of medical advances is the inclusion of animals in research. Medical research with the help of animal testing has prevented hepatitis B, measles, etc. (Karayiannis et al. 2004).

Read More
636 Words | 3 Pages

Although this is one of the first major oppositions to animal testing, animal testing was being practiced for millennia beforehand. There are two sides opposing each other in the argument of animal testing, and the argument is one of the oldest arguments still being debated today. Regarding this matter I have opinions on both sides. On one hand I agree with experiments on animals regarding biomedical researches on the other hand I do not agree with experiments on animals regarding cosmetics and product-testing.

Read More
649 Words | 3 Pages

There are over 26 million animals being used for scientific and commercial testing each year in the United States. Animals are being used for developing medical treatments, checking the safety of a product, and seeing the toxicity of medication before human use. Animal testing has contributed to many life saving medications, however animal testing is inhumane and cruel. Animals used in testing are put in experiments where there is force feeding, food and water deprivation, the infliction of wounds, physical restraint, decapitation, and many other inhumane acts. Alternative testing methods now exist that can replace the use of animals being used for scientific and commercial testing.

Read More
1158 Words | 5 Pages

Peter Singer explains and clarifies why animals should have rights when he writes, “The capacity for suffering is not just another characteristic like the capacity for language or higher mathematics. All animals have the ability to suffer in the same way and to the same degree that humans do. They feel pain, pleasure, fear, frustration, loneliness, and motherly love. Whenever we consider doing something that would interfere with their needs, we are morally obligated to take them into account”(singer 2). The significance of this passage is to explain that even though animals can not speak to us, and tell us that they are hurting, doesn’t mean we can continue to abuse them and conduct inhumane tests on them.

Read More
1262 Words | 6 Pages

Researchers are learning about diseases, symptoms, body processes, medicines, and more from animal testing. Humans and animals share a lot of the same processes, illnesses, birth defects, and disorders. This makes research on animals similar to that of humans without harming a person. The purpose of this article was to show the reasons why animal testing is good for medical research. I will not use this information in my paper because it is not new information.

Read More
735 Words | 3 Pages

All throughout the years, animal testing has been a very controversial debate, whether or not it is humane or completely cruel to the animals involved. This kind of testing on animals does not always leave the animal alive, which leaves people furious as to why scientists even test on them. New drugs sometimes are tested on animals first, but the most used animal testing companies are makeup ones. Animal testing in inhumane because testing on animal does not always yield same results as in humans and too many animals die in result of the tests. There are many different viewpoints on why some people think that animal testing is resourceful and helpful towards humans, but there is always two sides of every story.

Read More
700 Words | 3 Pages

Many Nobel Prize winners in medical field worked their examination on animal-base research in the twentieth century. Through animal research, the quality of life improves for millions of people. Therefore, opponents of animal experimentation should understand the benefits of medical technology that are crucial for

Read More
959 Words | 4 Pages

Animal testing is very cruel, it endangers the life of many animals just because some scientists want to make cosmetics and

Read More
885 Words | 4 Pages

Although there are many benefits and advancements that come with animal testing, there are downsides to all the procedures that are performed. There are individuals that are not in favor of animal experimentation but still support the testing for medical purposes. Over the prior years, the practice of using animals for medical and cosmetic research has been severely criticised (Hajar 42). Going back to the article, “Animals and Medical Testing,” Hajar notes that those opposed to practices believe that the benefits that humans get with the procedures performed do not favor the harm to animals (Hajar 42). Even though testing on animals is useful for our well-being, the animals that are being tested on can be harmed in the process.

Read More
589 Words | 3 Pages

Millions of animals are tortured and killed every year by laboratories testing various products on them. All types of testing is done on all types of animals. Anything from drug testing and cosmetic testing to organ donations. Most of the world's population does not agree with animal testing. Also only about 8% of the experiments show positive results.

Read More
727 Words | 3 Pages

The use of animal testing has being around for a long time. Since the beginning of time scientist, philosophers, and scholars have used animals as way of understanding the anatomy and physiology, pathology, and pharmacology. Surgical procedure was one of the main reason animals testing started, this helped physicians to practice surgical procedures in animals before applying them to humans. There has always been the opposition for using animal for scientific research or testing of any kind. I will go over in this paper about the ethical issues in the controversy of animal research.

Read More
1479 Words | 6 Pages

Animal Testing It happens every day. A patient suffering from a painful skin condition feels more comfortable with a drug that was once tested on rats. Another patient who has been given only months to live gets a reprieve through a procedure considered safe after initials experiments in pigs. Since the beginning of medical history, scientists have relied on the use of animals to test new substances and procedures to determine their safety and effectiveness. Because many medical practices that are currently used were tested in this fashion, may believe that it is the most effective and practical way to obtain the desired information.

Read More

More about Arguments Against Animal Testing

Related Topics

Open Document