ipl-logo

Arguments Against Labeling Meals

677 Words3 Pages

Labeling Meals are not so bad. In fact, it helps us keep track of our well-being. Two-thirds of the American average eat at home. Packaging food to be consumed in the home has included nutritional information such as calories, fat calories, sodium, calcium, and the like over the last 25 years. Regardless of the food is healthy or not research shows about one-quarter of customers use it to limit what the decide to consume. These buyers consume an average of 400 less calories than they typically did prior to labeling.

U.S. government agrees all restaurant meals should be labeled. This system was part of the Affordable Care Act of 2010, which required items that included information on nutrition. Americans consumed 18 percent of their calories away from home around 1977. That number has risen to 33 percent less than 30 years later. Not just in terms of calories, but terms of unhealthful ingredients such as fat and sodium, this trend poses increased risks for all of us. Consumers can address this risk better for it i armed with relevant information. People should know about how much fuel we should be putting in our bodies since they know the amount they put in their cars. …show more content…

For instance, this caused people to select healthier meals causing no change from the way those same customers ordered previously. People may not be acting on it since they liked the idea of nutritional labeling. I suggest those who read and follow his way actually need it the least. These people are health conscious, they have a great idea which meals are laden with calories, fats, and other ingredients included. The FDA also known as the Food and Drug Administration not only requires food to be labeled, but to provide the percentage Daily Value so that you can track the nutrients you consume. Something other than eating experience is frequently looked by a great number of

Open Document