Brown V Board Of Education Case Study

727 Words3 Pages

Behind the Scenes of Brown v. Board of Education

Behind the scenes of Brown v. Board of Education cases had a nonprofit organization that played an important hole in many fights of civil rights for African American. In 1909 the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) founded by W.E.B. DuBois, Ida Wells-Barnett, Mary White Ovington, and others, which had the objective to prevent lynching, fight for racial and social injustice through legal action. Later in the 1930s, the NAACP focus in fighting against racial segregation in public schools and universities by following the strategy of Charles Houston and his successor Thurgood Marshall based on the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which a defense team …show more content…

Board of Education to Supreme Court. (NARA).
First, Brown v. Board of Education was a name given by the U.S. Supreme Court which were five separate cases that were fighting against segregation in public schools. Beginning with the case of Bolling v. Sharpe in 1950, which was a parent group led by Gardner Bishop that try to enroll a group of Black students in all White John Philip Sousa Jr. High School, in Washington, D.C.; “The Supreme Court would eventually file a separate opinion on Bolling because the 14th Amendment was not applicable in Washington, D.C.” Second, in 1951 Briggs v. Elliot case in South Caroline which Marshal presented social science evidence that segregation harm Black school children based on the study of the sociologist Kenneth Clark's …show more content…

Supreme Court became vulnerable, due the fact that public school desegregation became a national issue to be resolved. The Brown v. Board of Education cases was heard many times between 1952 to 1954. One of the most important argument represented by Thurgood Marshall and his lawyers was based on testimony of around 30 social scientists that show evidences of the harmful effects of segregation on black and white students. In May of 1954, which the Supreme Court declaring that “separate but equal” schools for children of different races violated the Constitution, which the Chief Justice Earl Warren stated, “We conclude that in the field of public education the doctrine of “separate but equal” has no place. Separate educational facilities are inherently unequal.” (Fraser 732). However, the court decision wasn’t applied instantly because were expected opposition by the southern states, the Supreme Court requested the attorney generals of all segregated states develop a plan to desegregation of the public schools. After a year they handled a plan to proceed to desegregate the public schools, which it was called “Brown and Brown II” (United States