In the case of Tommy Blue he is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. As a juror, I believe that Tommy Blue is guilty because a majority of the factual evidence in the case incriminates Mr.Tommy Blue. To start off, a .38 caliber revolver went missing from the Blue’s residence days before the crime and the same gun was the murder weapon as testified by coroner Judy Morte. Although this .38 revolver was not recovered at the scene of the crime or found at any other site it is not highly likely that it was merely coincidental that the same gun used to murder Ms.Williams, was the only gun to go missing from the Blue’s residence where Tommy resides. Another item relevant to the case is the bolt cutters found by Officer Fuzzy Dunlop at Ms.Agnes Williams
In the Supreme Court case named Carroll v. Carman, the two police officers Carroll and Roberts were investigating a report that an armed man named Zita had stolen a car and went to hide in the house of Andrew and Karen Carman. When they arrived at the house, they found there was no parking and went down a sidestreet that led to a gravel parking area. They parked in the first spots at the rear of the house. They approached the house and saw a sliding glass door that opened onto a deck. They knocked on the door and Andrew Carman came out and refused to answer their questions about Zita.
Bell-Leon is not a stranger to Mr. Dylan Hendrick. The evidence will show that prior to the incident, there was an opportunity for Mr. Bell-Leon to see the defendant. Most respectfully, Your Honor, the evidence will show that there was an association between the complainant, the complainant's wife and the defendant that will serve as a motive in this case. Your Honor, the defendant knowingly and purposely attempted to take the life of the victim, Mr. Bell-Leon to remove him from the equation. Three’s a crowd and with the victim out of the picture, the defendant Mr. Hendricks would be able to rekindle his love affair with the complainant’s wife without
The documentary, Making a Murderer brought national attention to an otherwise statewide murder case known mainly in the state of Wisconsin. The cases, which both involved the murder of Teresa Halbach, were The State of Wisconsin Vs. Steven Avery and The State of Wisconsin Vs. Brendan Dassey. The handling of the cases is up to debate, especially the verdicts themselves.
Roper v. Simmons, the facts, issues, and court holding on this cause is about a 17 year old boy who was arrested for murder. Christopher Simmons, who was 17 when he was arrested for the murder of Shirley Crook. He was convicted of first-degree murder and sentenced to death. Christopher Simmons was accused of burglary and murder. Also it was said two of his friends helped him.
Ryker did not confess voluntarily under Kansas case law. Under this case law, to determine voluntariness
In the case Michael Peterson was being tried for the murder of his wife Kathleen. Peterson stated that he had found Kathleen at the bottom of the stairs bleeding badly after coming in from sitting at the pool side. He states that he thought that she had fallen down the stairs. Some people who are also involved in this case include their children and a military escort that is homosexual. It was found that Peterson had been trying to meet up with escorts to fulfill his homosexual needs.
On July 20, 1958, an elderly couple in Christian County, Kentucky were beaten to death in their home by intruders with a tire iron. Two suspects, Silas Manning and Willie Barker were arrested shortly after the murders and indicted by the grand jury on September 15, 1958. The prosecution believed the case against Manning was stronger; therefore, chose to try Manning first in hopes that once convicted, he would testify against Barker. Manning, of course, was not willing to incriminate himself. At the start of of Manning’s trial on October 23, 1958, the prosecution requested and obtained the first of what would amount to be 16 continuances in Barker’s trial.
The article on CNN, “Police: Remains Found under a Bridge Likely Student Who Vanished in 1998”, starts off with explaining how Robert Kovack had gone missing in 1998 on his way to his parent house in West Virginia. Eighteen Years later there was a body found under the New River Grove Bridge. Turns out there was a wallet and identification confirming that the bones of the body was in fact Kovack. The case has now been reopened and tests are going to be done to figure out what was the cause of death.
Better With Time: Nas Celebrates Hennessy 's 250th Anniversary Nas attends Hennessy 's 250th Anniversary celebration at the Lincoln Center 's Alice Tully Hall in New York City. Hennessy recently celebrated 250 years of excellence with a star-studded event at the Lincoln Center 's Alice Tully Hall in New York City. Amongst those present at the celebration, was Nas, the Hennessy ambassador shared his excitement for the brand stating, “We all hope we can last for 250 years in terms of our name, history, and brand. I am nowhere near that,” he said.
Innocence is is a lack of guilt, with respect to any kind of crime, or wrongdoing. In a legal context, innocence refers to the lack of legal guilt of an individual, with respect to a crime. Being convicted of a crime and found not guilty later on can frustrate the convict and the convict’s family as the time spent behind bars, is time they will never get back. James Richardson was convicted and charged for murder and rape in Cross Lanes, West Virginia on May 18, 1989. First, Richardson noticed the neighbor’s house burning.
Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, you are here because one person in this courtroom decided to take law into her own hands. The defendant, Mrs. Dominique Stephens, murdered the man that she vowed to love. This sole act by the defendant is violation of all morals and her husband’s right to live. Afterwards, she even felt guilty about this violation of justice and called the cops on herself, and she later signed a written statement stating that she is guilty of the murder of Mr. Donovan Stephens. Then the defendant later recanted this statement and said that she only killed Mr. Stephens in self defense.
Basically there were two parents trying to get custody over there three year old son. The father of the son initially had brought the mother to court because he stated he felt like he could endure his son needs and she couldn’t. Therefore the mother on the other side didn’t have a layer she was defending for herself. She was very distraught because she just couldn’t understand why her child might be taken away from her with the exception of every other weekend. However in this case the dad ended up winning custody over his son because the judge decided that she was unfit because she currently didn’t have a job and she had moved to another part of North Carolina with the son and basically trying to take the dad out of son’s
1. The type of personality type Hank is displaying is the oral and anal stage, because Hank is very sarcastic and aggressive, he is on a date with a women who he seems to be very interested in and can’t seem to get control of his behavior. One minute he seems to be enjoying himself and the next he is very belligerent, loud and rude. Hank has a bad habit of over eating and chain smoking when things in his life become stressful; this is why he is overweight.
The following scenario will show how one case can involve a numerous professions. 911 received a call at 3:30am on April 13, 2014 reporting a house fire with pregnant woman thought to be inside. The fire department was called to disperse the fire fighter. After entering the home, they realized the woman was still alive and rushed her to the hospital! The fire investigator came to figure out why the house caught on fire after the firefighters saw possible signs of arson.
