ipl-logo

Comparing Logos, Ethos And Aristotle's Rhetorical Triangle

887 Words4 Pages

In conclusion, the cultural contexts, such as the writer’s and the audience’s nationality and backgrounds, have the important meaning to the message of the sentences. Depend on the cultural viewpoints of the writer, the choice of the words and the emphasized points are changed. Also, the audience’s knowledge and thought influence to the way to accept the contents. In other words. the rhetorical situation works as a base of this essay. To sum up, the relationship between the expected audiences, the writer, and the contents, reflects their cultural contexts respectively.

For this final essay, I cited the paragraph from the conclusion of the sentence task. Since, this essay is the first assignment and I did not have basic knowledge of the …show more content…

For example, the contents, especially related to the Aristotle’s Rhetorical Triangle, I seem like I did not fully understand the meaning of them, or I mistranslated them from the aspect of the writing. Therefore, the sentence does not make sense at all. Also, I just applied the terms, such as Logos, Pathos, and Ethos without adapting its meaning into an essay’s aspect. Therefore, these jargon make this essay more complicated and seems like the terms went off the topic. Thus, in the revised paragraph, in order to make this conclusion more easy to understand, instead of mentioning about them, I more focused on each components, the writer, the audiences, and the contents, which construct the …show more content…

I think, mostly the selected words suit to the academic writing style, and they are appropriate to its rhetorical situation. However, through changing the selection of the words, I repeated the same contents unconsciously. Therefore, to avoid repetition, in the revised paragraph, I tried to deliver only the important message in one sentence. In addition, to put all information into one sentence, I had to choose the simple and the most suitable words to explain the information briefly. Also, when I focused on the rhetorical situation, I noticed that I should pick up some formal terms in order to make these sentences suit to the academic essay. Moreover, in the first essay, I did not pay attention to the audiences, therefore, I frequently used complicated abstract terms without explaining its meaning in that sentences. Therefore, in my previous essay, as the feedback said, I failed to cover the main argument points, and these sentence are lack of the deeper details. As a result, it is difficult to understand for the audiences. Hence, in the revised paragraph, I tried to select the words to support my

Open Document