Comparison Of Marijuan Crossroads Of Illicit Drug And Personal Preference

Crossroads of Illicit Drug and Personal Preference Pot, weed, chronic, dope, grass or other nicknames are the same drug called marijuana. Various sobriquets are the proof of a fair proportion of peoples’ affection for marijuana. By the 20th century, using marijuana was increased for pleasure purpose. In the 1960s, hippy culture aroused in American culture, drugs were the one of its cultures. During this time period, marijuana is the widest distribution among other unlawful drugs. Lots of musicians in 60’s expressed their marijuana experience in the many music, and they contributed to psychedelic rock. Likewise, THC, the psychoactive chemical found in marijuana, improve people’s mood. By now, numerous questions arise: What did marijuana do

National Council on Alcoholism and Drug Dependence (NCADD) indicates that “numerous studies have shown marijuana smoke to contain 50-70 % more carcinogenic hydrocarbons than tobacco smoke.” For the better public health, the maleficence of secondhand smoke should not be belittled. This is why regulation of marijuana is needed to make improve people

People who argued in favor of legalizing marijuana is that marijuana is not addictive and can easily control. On the contrary to this argument, many studies show that marijuana is more destructive than a cigarette. Tzu-Chin WU, M.D., Donald P. Tashkin, M.D., Behnam Djahed, M.D., and Jed E. Rose, Ph.D. compared the pulmonary hazard of smoking marijuana and tobacco based on the result of 15 men subjects. They “measured each subject's blood carboxyhemoglobin level before and after smoking and the amount of tar inhaled and deposited in the respiratory tract from the smoke of single filter-tipped tobacco cigarettes (900 to 1200 mg) and marijuana cigarettes (741 to 985 mg) containing 0.004 percent or 1.24 percent Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol.” Then, they got a result: “smoking marijuana was associated with a nearly fivefold greater increment in the blood carboxyhemoglobin level, an approximately threefold increase in the amount of tar inhaled, and retention in the respiratory tract of one third more inhaled tar (P<0.001).” This observation drew a conclusion: “regardless of tetrahydrocannabinol content, results in a substantially greater respiratory burden of carbon monoxide and tar than smoking a similar quantity of