ipl-logo

Comparison Of Tuckman And Jenson's Stages Of Group Development

510 Words3 Pages

Phil Jones was not trained on how to deal with people problem, he also was not entirely sure how to be a team leader. Phil eventually realized this and turned to books on teams and groups to get a further understand of the situation. Phil read about the stages of group development found in Tuckman (1965). As stated in Tuckman and Jenson (1977), the stages were revisited and Bruce Tuckman and Mary Ann Jenson added a fifth stage. Now there are a total of five stages of group development and having read them all Phil came to the conclusion that his group was stuck at stage number two, the storming stage. According to Bonebright (2009), the storming stage can involve disagreements and put a strain on the group as it has not been clarified to them what their …show more content…

It also may lead to work moving slower than anticipated and being behind can lead to annoyance.

Using Bruce Tuckman and Jenson’s stages of group development I would wholly agree to Phil’s diagnosis of the situation as there are many comparisons between the stages of group development and the position Phil’s team is in. The case study gives us a clear description of the transition of the team from the Forming stage to the Storming stage. In reference to Tuckman (1965), the forming stage is when the team members are still getting to know each other and it is unlikely for them to disagree with their teammates and this is to avoid conflict within the team at an early stage. Phil wanted to generate some competition within the team without going out of his way as in his opinion a team needs some disagreements to be able to bring about more and better ideas. Phil’s point of view that teams need some debate is what generally happens to teams when reaching the storming stage. Instead of this working out in his favor the team ended up with more issues than accomplishments. They had now entered the storming stage which resulted in Phil

Open Document