ipl-logo

Controversy Of Standardized Testing

1859 Words8 Pages

The Controversy of Standardized Testing

Students everywhere take standardized tests. However, are they truly beneficial to the students? Are these tests capable of showing what students can really do? Or, are they biased against the test-taker, making it harder to reach his or her goals? Is it fair to base a student’s intelligence on one simple test grade that that student might have had a disadvantage in? In America, this happens every day. Although many people believe standardized testing is a justified way of measuring intelligence and grading students, a growing number of people in America feel that standardized test taking is biased, inaccurate, and an ineffective way of measuring student intelligence.

Some parents …show more content…

“...Performance on standardized tests depends on the quality of the individual school system, material covered in classes and financial status- all of which can be considered unfair advantages” (Kokoszka 1). Schools with more funding may have students do better on tests (Kokoszka 1). “...there are many unfair advantages present…” (Kokoszka 2). If a student could afford it, a tutor could be hired to give that student an edge over others taking the standardized tests.(Kokoszka 2). Testing is biased, so that only those who are more financially stable or with more resources will get higher scores. This is also shown in Kohn’s data, saying, “Research has repeatedly found that the amount of poverty in the communities...along with other variables having nothing to do with what happens in classrooms, accounts for the great majority of difference in test scores from one are to the next.” …show more content…

Shouldn’t all students have an equal shot? “Colleges do not incorporate the resources used to achieve standardized test scores; therefore students are compared in ineffective ways.” (Kokoszka 2). Testing and reviewing student’s scores and grades may not accurately show how well schools are doing in educating students (Kohn 4). This process may make it harder to accurately see how students are doing, and whether or not students are at the same level if one has an amazing tutor. Many believe that standardized testing may have even started as a way to show the achievement gap between students of different races. “During the 1960’s, more civil rights advocates began to argue that widespread, easily comparable data was necessary in order to make visible the achievement gap between black and white and poor and middle-class children…” (Goldstein). This data is comparable, but it is evident that it’s first purpose was to be biased against students. Bias is a huge concern for many, as it is more known than ever nowadays how hard other ethnicities have to work in order to be respected and sometimes even considered equal. Furthermore, “...only 14 states attempt to equalize funding between public schools in poor and efficient

Show More
Related
1599 Words | 7 Pages

How did the American economy shift to support World War II? Economics is typically defined as how resources are managed within a system. However, the resources mentioned are not the ones that are typically thought of. Typically resources are only thought of as oils, gases, and minerals. Although, those are not always the most important.

Read More
274 Words | 2 Pages

: In my opinion, standardized testing is beneficial but also flawed. I agree they’re non-discriminatory because the content is equivalent for all students, but teachers are “teaching to the test,” leaving out additional learning opportunities. From experience, I believe the tests are

Read More
1776 Words | 8 Pages

Standardized Testing: Making College Admissions “Fair” Every year , the daunting prospect of undergoing standardized testing brings anxiety to thousands of high school students, and for good reason: a student’s performance on standardized college admission exams - most importantly, the ACT and SAT - is a major determinant in deciding where they will go to college. For decades, such standardized tests have been universally accepted as part of the admissions process: proponents argue, as Syverson (2007) explains, that such tests are the only way of standardizing college admissions when students from different schools have such widely varying profiles. However, in the past several decades a growing anti-testing movement has begun to poke holes

Read More
415 Words | 2 Pages

This choice of deciding a person 's entrance or exclusion has its share of supporters. However, the effectiveness of standardized testing is questionable amongst some. Certainly, critics oppose standardized tests with the rationale that they do not accurately measure students ' knowledge, and they are expensive and stressful. For example, envision a high school student that, in terms of academic intelligence, measures far beyond par when it

Read More
894 Words | 4 Pages

Standardized tests are one of the most popular ways schools attempt to evaluate academic intelligence of students, school districts, and teachers. These tests are used more specifically to evaluate student performance in the education system by testing their abilities in mathematics, english and sciences. By giving every student the same test, they are setting a standard idea for how well every student should score on the test, such as the SAT or the ACT, no matter the school or educational process they are receiving. Allowing every student to take the exact same test, gives the state a way to generalize student’s academic intelligence without having to do much work to make the testing one hundred percent fair. Standardized testing in schools should no longer be required because it discriminates against the less wealthy families, does not effectively measure achievement and becomes a distraction to the student’s learning environment.

Read More
290 Words | 2 Pages

Standardized test scores should not be reflective of how well a student comprehends the subject matter, let alone these scores are inaccurate and unfairly predetermine educational mobility for many disadvantaged students. Phelps (2005) defends standardized test and argues that student test takers have an equal ability and opportunity to learn the subject matter tested. However, students all start off school at different levels, some with previous knowledge and others come into school not even speaking the english language. The quality of education each individual student obtains is in no means comparable therefore, this already creates an uneven foundation for “equal” standardized test taking.

Read More
566 Words | 3 Pages

Standardized testing is a very well known topic for a lot of people. Many people believe they are helpful to measure students intelligence and academic performance. Just as many people believe it is unfair, stressful, and affects the school and state as a whole. Standardized testing is an unfair approach to measure each student’s academic performance; and is something we should get rid of.

Read More
1000 Words | 4 Pages

Is Standardized Testing Really on Our Side? Everyone has experienced the stress of having to take a standardized test at least once in their lives. In fact, pre test break downs are now so common, that it has become regulation for test booklets to include instructions for an event where a student might vomit on their booklet. Clearly, there is something wrong with our current way of measuring intelligence if it has gone so far that students and teacher are being unfairly given such and amount of stress and anxiety. Standardized testing is not effective as it doesn't only inaccurately test intelligence and misrepresent student’s potential, but also does more harm to students and society than good.

Read More
1536 Words | 7 Pages

Even if the tests were unfair it would not be as much of a problem if the tests helped us at all. Despite the tests having been in place for over 50 years, their implementation has not increased America’s scores on an international level. But of course, some are going to disagree as people always do. Those who disagree say that the tests help to determine who will do well in college. An edited volume, Defending Standardized Testing, edited by Richard Phelps, was created on the basis that standardized tests have benefits for students and teachers.

Read More
704 Words | 3 Pages

Standardized tests shouldn’t be given to students to measure their intelligence. Although, many have said that tests have been proven to show a student’s future Performance in higher education, military, and work force. What they may need to consider that the tests doesn’t have all those standards that would make them eligible. Also, even in higher education they still have to teach you what you don’t know. The same things on the standardized tests aren’t always what students learn in class.

Read More
783 Words | 4 Pages

Many people complain that that standardized testing evaluates an applicant’s performance only on one particular day, it doesn’t provide an accurate measure of how well the candidate will perform in college, since it does not test all the skills he or she has. Because not all of the students are highly capable learners, these scores cannot be a marker of their intelligence. I agree that these tests divide students

Read More
935 Words | 4 Pages

Certainly, some people say that standardized testing is the only way to determine growth and achievement within students. But, these tests don’t usually provide an entire measure of educational attainment. They don’t give attributes such as a sense of wonder, leadership, compassion, curiosity, and critical thinking. Daniel Koretz, a psychometrician stated, “…tests can measure only a portion of the goals of education, which are necessarily broader and more inclusive than the test could possibly be”(humbleisd.net). Standardized tests can at best only measure if a student is good at their core classes.

Read More
999 Words | 4 Pages

“Why should wealthy parents be able to opt out of the over testing by sending their children to private schools while disadvantaged students are forced to exist in a high-stakes, over tested climate for the sake of producing data that confirm what everyone already knows: Their schools lack the needed supports. (Dianis)” This first bias puts those who were born into less wealthier families immediately at the disadvantage as they are exposed to far more testing. Another bias is that depending on which school a student attends, their score could be greatly affected. The tests are not a matter of intelligence, but a matter of what is specifically taught within the school systems to pass the test.

Read More
1495 Words | 6 Pages

Students with a wealthier background can also be exposed to further learning resources and methods of higher education that other students may not have access to. This is something that many test designers may be unaware of and is not considered when test scores are evaluated. While these points argue that standardized tests lack reliability and accuracy in many cases, some support the idea that standardized tests do more good than harm to the modern school

Read More
1784 Words | 8 Pages

The leading argument regarding standardized testing is that they are a fair and organized way to measure and exemplify students academic performance over time, or as a benchmark. These mandated tests are administered in the same manner, which makes the examination process seamless and easy to receive results. To uphold this position, David Sadker and Karen Zittleman investigate the relationship between these tests and the federal government. They state a few of the agreeable factors surrounding mandated tests, “Standardized tests can be quite appealing: they are relatively inexpensive to administer, they can be mandated with comparative ease and rapidly implemented, and they can deliver measurable results” (Sadker and Zittleman 742). There are many upsides to standardized testing, one being that it makes testing every student at once easy, and can be done in an organized fashion.

Read More

More about Controversy Of Standardized Testing

Related Topics

Open Document