ipl-logo

Cost And Benefit Of Privatization In Canada

626 Words3 Pages

The combination between having both private and public health care systems in Ontario will not only benefit the citizens of Canada, but the economy as well. The privatization aspect initiates a well-structured approach, which all in all could work with the public sector to ensure efficiency and sustainability within the system. By incorporating the privatization of heath care it would ensure shorter wait times, improved doctor and patient communication and ensure a smoother process. In terms of support, the government could invest towards private hospitals and ensure they function in an efficient manner for those attracted towards that concept. For instance, in the article The Costs and Benefits of Privatization: An Incomplete Contracts Approach, …show more content…

For example, the 407 highway in Ontario is public-private run which means that it is accessible to all citizens of Canada however it will cost commuters to use. Although it is an expensive resource, many Ontarians use to service on a daily basis because it is more efficient in terms or no traffic, more lanes and quick. Likewise, if healthcare was considered in the same manner with a private-public sector provided it would be beneficial for the public sector as well. Also, the addition of private-public hospitals will strengthened the quality of the service provided as well as the accountability of the patient. This could be done through providing the accessibility to these resources and allowing the citizens to choose which resource they want to proceed with. In terms of insurance, it would still be presentable towards the private-public service however an additional fee will be required to ensure a better quality of services. By initiating this idea, hospitals will start to become more efficient since they are providing more options to receive treatment and the decision will ultimately be based upon the view of the

Show More
Related
579 Words | 3 Pages

I think hospitals should some type of in hospital insurance for uninsured persons or hospitals could assess patients in getting the right connection to get insurance before they leave the hospital. What lesson learned can help future medical/legal

Read More
663 Words | 3 Pages

Pat Armstrong’s thesis in Managing Care the Canadian Way, is that expanding Canada’s public health care system the way that Canada has been doing so for the last 30 years, rather than privatizing it the way the United States’ health care system runs, is the best way to improve it. Armstrong argues that Canadian health care as a non-profit system is superior to the largely profited and privately administrated services in the United States. Canada has begun to bring American style health care into the system and Armstrong believes that this will have a negative impact on the Canadian health system in cost, accessibility and quality of health care. The strategies used in Canadian Medicare to manage costs are much more effective than managed care in the United States.

Read More
791 Words | 4 Pages

All Canadian’s have free access to “hospital and physician services1. While it is federally funded but how it is structured is up to each individual province as along as their plans insure all the Canadian’s within that province can receive the benefits of this health care. However this health care system does have its down falls despite its promise to provide care to all of those who need it. One

Read More
1366 Words | 6 Pages

Unfortunately, even with Medicare and an established system, Canada is lacking in many of these requirements, which has led to a variety of problems across the country. With Canada’s quality of healthcare on a decline, we are left with the question: “Why is the Canadian healthcare system in crisis?” Firstly, Canada’s use of funds has become inefficient and unsustainable. Secondly, there are many problems with organization within the public system. Finally, Canada is facing a devastating staffing crisis, which has led to negative consequences for both patients and healthcare workers.

Read More
1066 Words | 5 Pages

The health landscapes in both the United States and Canada differ remarkably and evince distinctly held values as well as governmental underpinnings as to how health services are offered in each country. Meanwhile, the United States mostly holds a private-sector posture, with a lot of insurance provided to employees through a market-driven. In a nutshell, whilst these hold sway, Canadians pride themselves on a universally covered, internationally acknowledged, publicly funded system whereby the weird thing is surprising while the other part, of the coin, seeing that every citizen gets access to whatever necessary health care services. In the end, their disparity comes based on achieving the high standard of goal, how they are funded, how the

Read More
1172 Words | 5 Pages

Federalism affects Public Policy In Canada the health care system is a group of health insurance plans which provide coverage for all Canadian citizens. Health care is a public policy in Canada and it is greatly affected by federalism because of its power enabling a significant role in the development of the health care policy. It is funded through provincial support with guidelines set by the federal government. There are some differences between the federal power and provincial power in health care. The majority of the legislative power in health care is granted to the provincial level of the government.

Read More
832 Words | 4 Pages

Should the Canadian health care system be privatized? Currently, In Canada we have a universal health care, what this means is that medical services are provided to every Canadian citizen paid for by taxpayers and also by revenues collected from leading industries. There has been a huge controversy over the last couples of years, on whether we should remain to have universal health care system, privatized or adapt to a mixed health care system. Canadian health care should not be privatized because health care should be available to everybody regardless of their income.

Read More
882 Words | 4 Pages

Privatizing leaves the neediest without coverage or in dept. The average retiree cannot afford private coverage. Not only does privatization cost more, but the price of Medicare would continue to rise. Without government funds, medical care becomes unstable, less effective, and more expensive and would leave many Americans uncovered, and damaged. Privatizing Medicare and Social Security means taking funds from the social security trust fund and placing those funds into private accounts ran by private companies; causing the problem that “privatization would transfer huge administrative fees to Wall Street.

Read More
577 Words | 3 Pages

On the contrary, the main argument for privatisation is that private companies have a profit incentive to cut costs and be more efficient. Privatization is argued to reduce waitlists the current system has been taxed with. Healthcare privatization would improve access to medical care for patients who purchase private insurance and, by freeing public resources, for those who remain in the public system (Dirnfeld, 1996). Quality of care is impacted by an underfunded public system which has led to poor health and deaths. In British Columbia Dirnfeld (1996) states the waiting list for elective surgery grew significantly and there are waiting lists of many months for coronary angiography and angioplasty treatments.

Read More
127 Words | 1 Pages

In general, privatization has many pros and cons. Some pros of privatization are that it allows both citizens and government managers to achieve certain goals. For example, through privatization, cost savings increases, gives contracting government access to expertise because it is cheaper to hire architects, engineers or lawyers on an as needed basis rather than full time employment. Competitors provides buyer and bidders with better quality services and incentives to compete with other vendors. Additionally, through privatization, ideally everything is intended to be completed on a timely manner because “time is money” and therefore can face penalties for delays.

Read More
554 Words | 3 Pages

In Canada’s healthcare there a five main principles. Public administration; all administration of provincial health insurance must be carried out by a public authority on a non-profit basis. They also must be accountable to the province or territory and their records and accounts are subject to adults. Comprehensiveness; all necessary health services, including hospitals, physicians and surgical dentists, must be insured. Universality; all insured residents are entitled to the same level of health

Read More
895 Words | 4 Pages

Canada enjoys the benefits of a “universal” insurance plan funded by the federal government. The idea of having a publicly administered, accessible hospital and medical services with comprehensive coverage, universality and portability has its own complex history, more so, than the many challenges in trying to accommodate the responsibility of a shared-cost agreement between federal and provincial governments. (Tiedemann, 2008) Canada’s health care system has gone through many reforms, always with the intent to deliver the most adequate health care to Canadians. The British North American Act, Hospital Insurance and Diagnostic Services Act, Saskatchewan’s Medical Care Act, and the Canada Health Act are four Acts that have played an important

Read More
751 Words | 4 Pages

So if people want to pay a small amount, then they can go to a private hospital. For example, If health and education sectors did not done by the state, many people like the health care system in the America, will be forced to pay for services received. But many people may not

Read More
450 Words | 2 Pages

Due to this believe everyone has access to healthcare, if the healthcare system was privatized prices of healthcare would soar and only the wealthy would only be able to afford the prices to receive treatment from the health care system, which was seen when the American health care system was

Read More
1087 Words | 5 Pages

hospitals than the private clinics ­ Even though the cost of physician in govt hospitals are almost nil, the opportunity cost could

Read More

More about Cost And Benefit Of Privatization In Canada

Related Topics

Open Document