ipl-logo

Cutting International Science Funding Will Only Hurt America Essay

616 Words3 Pages

Since the Trump administration came into power in America, President Trump has limited the many policies in many aspects. For example, the public communications of scientific agencies and the ban of immigration for seven countries, etc. Many concrete positions on scientific priorities or funding plans have been taken by the administration. President Trump has cut many funding on unnecessary science researches to improve Americans’ lot. After reading this article "Cutting International Science Funding Will Only Hurt America." written by Sarah Scoles. Here comes a question: Scientists unable to contribute to their own resources should be excluded from large scale international research project? Maybe the answer to this question is no. Reducing spending on unnecessary global science researches, President Trump will just get the opposite effects. This policies will hurt many American science and scientists. Also, it will slow the progress of benefiting the whole world. Here are three reasons that explain why scientists unable to contribute to their own resources should not be excluded from large scale international research project. First, many scientists do the researches, and some people think some researches they do are unnecessary. However, the researches seem unnecessary may be the necessary …show more content…

They may worried that whether this policies will affect their further exploration of science, or whether their research funding will be reduced. Doing the researches can always be costive. Without the support of money, their researches are very hard to continue. People will lose many essential findings in science because of the concerns on money. The American Government can reduce the spending of money on some other aspects instead of reducing the funding on the aspect of

Show More
Related

Pt1420 Week 3 Discussion 1

477 Words | 2 Pages

Question 1 b. In what circumstances di you think scientists are justified in not sharing their results with others before research is completed? o I believe that scientists should not share their results until research is completed and they have fully justified their results. I believe so because other researchers and scientists use results in helping them with experiments, developing models, curing disease, etc. so if quickly scientists share results or models that they are not sure of scientists should use wrong information.

Read More

Summary Of Best Hope Lies In Private Fund Stem Cell Research

1785 Words | 8 Pages

Using simple logic in this stamen makes people understand where she is coming from and relate to her opinion. The statement not only targets the government but also the effect bills and funding have on scientist and people who want to advance society. The U.S. came close to tripling spending on biomedical research, and when federal funding decreased, private funding increased to make up for what the government did not give out. (Fry-Revere 4) The author reinforces her claim by stating that it is far better to be privately funded do to less restriction of ethical conduct.

Read More

Keith Yost Should We Cut NASA Funding

1759 Words | 8 Pages

By Cutting NASA’s budget it will not just decrease the space programs budget, like Yost’s believes, it will decrease the budget of every department within NASA. According to the article “The GOP attack on climate change science takes a big step forward” written by Michael Hiltzik, the Earth Science Department will be cut by nearly 20% losing over 323 million dollars, which will cripple their ability to research the global climate changes. Even by decreasing NASA’s budget Keith Yost’s wont be happy, because he didn’t do the proper research. Yost also said that the huge expenses that were going toward the militaries budget didn’t matter and that it wouldn’t change the outcome. According to “Defense Spending:

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of Cuts Under The Harper Government

848 Words | 4 Pages

Under the Harper government, hundreds of federal research facilities and programs, have faced cuts to their budgets or been shut down, facing outrage from scientists, politicians and Canadians alike. In six years the Harper government dismissed more than 20000 scientists and aided in the closing of hundreds of programs, ranging from climate change to ocean toxicity to public health. Despite these cuts, the office of the Minister of State for Science and Technology has stated “Our government has made record investments in science… We are working to strengthen partnerships to get more ideas from the lab to the marketplace and increase our wealth of knowledge” (CBC 1). Many of the scientific community cite these cuts to a refocusing of government,

Read More

Should We Cut NASA Funding Keith Yost Analysis

1086 Words | 5 Pages

In the article, “Should We Cut NASA Funding?” written by Keith Yost, he answers the questions that have been the topic of debate for over 20 years. He states that it is predicted that in the Florida conference, President Obama will talk about the reductions that will be made to NASA’s budget. In his article, Yost takes a clear position on the

Read More

Seaborg's Accomplishments

983 Words | 4 Pages

"People must understand that science is inherently neither a potential for good nor for evil. It is a potential to be harnessed by man to do his bidding" ~ Glenn T. Seaborg. Seaborg thinks differently than most people, he believes that no one is powerful enough to know what is going to come out of a scientific discovery. If a discovery is beneficial to humans in any way, it has the same outcome as if it is destructive and horrible for human nature. What he is saying is that no matter the outcome, a new discovery is always a push forward for science, something new and not known before.

Read More

How Did Neil Degrass Tyson Impact Society

1236 Words | 5 Pages

“Nothing can stop the man with the right mental attitude from achieving his goal; nothing on earth can help the man with the wrong mental attitude” - Thomas Jefferson. This quote is most notably upheld by famed astronomer and astrophysicist Neil Degrasse Tyson, who pushes through each day with the goal of not only doing his best for the good of science, but for the common good of the people. His achievements involving things like recording information found by the Hubble Telescope and other large scientific missions have thrust the country forward in terms of knowledge and innovation. After examining the life of Neil Degrasse Tyson, one could only admit the impact he has made on modern society because of his scientific achievements and his selfless desire to teach the general public not only to learn about space, but to be curious about everything, has been astronomical.

Read More

Grounding For The Metaphysics Of Morals, By J. S. Mill

2236 Words | 9 Pages

Because of science, we have cured once fatal diseases, survived in the extremest conditions, in or out of nature, and understand the world around us. The harm done would not only be towards the expression of the individuals who want to understand the world, but to the world as we could not advance any further as a race if we remain stagnant in our understanding of

Read More

Why Schools Want To Teach The Controversy Analysis

1488 Words | 6 Pages

Science itself has largely been a topic of controversy for the education system; as they argue what of science to teach, and whether or not it will cause strife with the community. Especially if that conflict happens to be from religious, personal, or cultural differences. At all costs the education system avoids conflict. However, conflict or not, science is the fundamental basis of everything around humanity. From the plastic cups one drinks from, to the cell phone at one’s fingertips.

Read More

Does America Rely Too Much On Technology Essay

759 Words | 4 Pages

Many more problems exist in the research. People can rely on technology such as cars for transportation until proven that cars do cause damage to the weather. With weapons, the government will protect America, and with cars causing global warming, scientists have not proved that yet. Until they do, we have nothing to worry

Read More

Frankenstein: The Ethics Of Modern Day Science

933 Words | 4 Pages

Truth is though, if one doubts how far we should go, we might never know how far we can go. The threat of science has always been exaggerated through horror films, to star wars. Yes there are things that have gone wrong that science has created the atomic bomb, hydrogen bomb, chemical warfare. There are also so much more things that have gone right, such as created new sources of energy, vaccines and medicines

Read More

Albert Einstein Ethos Pathos Logos

692 Words | 3 Pages

He argued that science is essential to our understanding of the world and plays a crucial role in shaping our society. He stressed that science should be a public trust and that it is the responsibility of scientists to use their knowledge for the benefit of humanity. He supported his argument with a variety of examples, including the role of science in creating new technologies and in solving important social problems. He also spoke about the importance of international cooperation and the role of scientists in working together to create a better

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of The Kyoto Protocol

1023 Words | 5 Pages

Trump argued that the Paris Agreement undermined the US economy, put us at a disadvantage and the withdrawal would be in accordance with his America First Policy. Trump also reasoned that sending $100 billion a year in aid alone to poorer countries (by 2020) was deplorable, even though we have restricted their economies to mere nutshells and have severely put a disadvantage to any of their defense system against the impacts of climate change. His decisions would be different if he knew that our oceans already hold 35 percent

Read More

Persuasive Essay Space

1023 Words | 5 Pages

Fund space exploration? Why should Americans do that? There are far more first world problems to deal with. I do not believe American people should continue to find space exploration. There is poverty all around America.

Read More

Argumentative Essay On Space Exploration

359 Words | 2 Pages

Space exploration is to dangerous and expensive for us to make it a priority. We shouldn’t waste our money on something will only benefit some people when we can use that money to help people in need. Space exploration could be lead by private enterprises which will run out of money and since they aren’t getting money they just wasted all the money they had on something that is not beneficial. We shouldn’t spend valuable resources on space exploration.

Read More

More about Cutting International Science Funding Will Only Hurt America Essay

Related Topics

Open Document