ipl-logo

Dbq Catholic Church In The 1600s

737 Words3 Pages

Ava Crozier AP Euro, Period 4 Mr. Garner 7 February 2023 DBQ: Evaluate whether or not the Catholic Church in the 1600s was opposed to new ideas in science. Throughout the 17th century, the Catholic Church faced having to determine whether they stood more pro- or anti-science. Leading up to this, renaissance ideas of humanism and secularism were generally accepted, as long as they were able to align with the Church as well. Greco-Roman thought was studied, but it was often changed to support more modern ideas, like how the neoplatonists used some of Plato’s ideas to support Christian thought. However, the Protestant church was very accepting of science and knowledge. The Protestant Reformation led to the Scientific Revolution and was assisted …show more content…

This debate was sparked by the discussion of geocentrism versus heliocentrism, and Paolo Antonio Foscarini, both a monk and a scientist, argued that heliocentrism took so long to become popular because it went against the scriptures (Doc 1). Even though Foscarini saw the reason behind heliocentrism, he agreed that it went against the Church. Cardinal Bellarmine wrote a letter of response to Foscarini, and in it he explained that it is dangerous to entertain ideas of science, because they can be interpreted to go against the consensus of the Holy Fathers (Doc 2). This means that it cannot be understood through the eyes of the Catholic faith, and therefore goes against the Church. In a letter to the Grand Duchess Christina of Tuscany, a secular leader, Galileo Galilei wrote that he believes the Bible to contain metaphors, but it would be considered heretical to suggest any ideas other than the commonly accepted one by the Catholic Church (Doc 4). He realized that, while science and religion may be able to agree, the Church did not agree with science, and instead sided with a literal interpretation of the Bible. After he expressed his opinions, Galileo was forced to denounce them in an inquisition (EBD). The church believed Galileo to be going against faith, and put him on trial under threat of torture. This reaction to Galileo’s suggestions proves that the Church would not acknowledge the importance and truth to science, instead favoring their traditional view of the world. In addition, the Jesuits of Clermont College published a critique of Descartes, the creator of the scientific method, saying his thoughts went against everything they stood for, including math, philosophy, and religion (Doc 7). As a group that supported both education and religion, it was obvious they viewed modern science as a threat and did not support it. This evidence shows that many

Show More
Related
456 Words | 2 Pages

Galileo believes in the Bible and that God has supreme authority over the world, but he sees religion and science as two different things. It is not the purpose of the Bible to explain the physical world, it is there to save our souls. He makes three distinguishes: The Bible and Church have all matters of faith. , if any scientific finding if proven to be true but is against the teachings of the Bible, then we have not found the true meaning of the Bible, and anything not proven that is against the Bible must be

Read More
408 Words | 2 Pages

As the Church continued to give ideas without proof people got more curious and started to want an answer from the Church. This caused a struggle between the Church and the people. There is a great struggle between the Church and the people. Galileo believes that the Church

Read More
431 Words | 2 Pages

Throughout history, there have been multiple different religions that have been established throughout the world. The Protestant Reformation was a religious reform movement during the 1500’s. It created Protestantism, which is a branch of Christianity. Martin Luther argued against the Church’s policies about indulgences, as well as priests being the only ones allowed to teach the bible, and The Pope interpreting scriptures that all Catholics were supposed to follow. I believe Martin Luther during the 1500’s was accurate with his beliefs of what the Church’s policies could become.

Read More
1027 Words | 5 Pages

The Scientific Revolution was in action which started the division between secular and religious beliefs. “In 1613, Kepler was excommunicated because he believed the moon was a solid body. The Lutheran theologians said this contradicted Scripture, where the moon is described as a “lesser light to rule the night.” Since the moon is a “light,” the theologians said, it could not be a solid body.” (Excommunicated For Scientific Beliefs).

Read More
370 Words | 2 Pages

The condemnation of Galileo Galilei by the Catholic Church in the early 1600s for his scientific findings about the Sun and Earth was a midoing but inevitable due to common complacent beliefs and the religious doctrine of the time period. For instance, in this era the Catholic Church and their interpretation of the Bible reigned supreme and few people ever publicly either intentionally or unintentionally went against the Church’s beliefs and authority on fear of being accused of heresy[C]. The Catholic Church held the holy scriptures in so high regard that if any statement in any way contradicted the the Bible the author would be persecuted.

Read More
565 Words | 3 Pages

The Reformation was one of the biggest movements in both European and British history; the Reformation brought forth clarity and led to an almost total collapse of the church’s rule over different forms of society, and with that, government adapted. Humanism came to light and prior to the Renaissance, most Europeans and some Brits were required to follow the teachings of Catholicism strictly. Many people had little exposure to any form of education beyond that, and science was a concept that was not-well-understood. Beings that everyone followed Catholic rule, very little, if any, of the Church’s teachings were challenged. Those who did speak out, however, were accused of heresy and labelled as a heretic.

Read More
838 Words | 4 Pages

Galileo is known as the “the father of science”. He is famous for discovery of the “stars” revolving around Jupiter (MACHAMER, 19). He was also infamous for “Galileo affair” which is the name given to his trails by the church for heresy. This essay will show that Galileo had little regard for the stunting of science in the name of religion and that a literal translation of the bible in face of science is erroneous.

Read More
633 Words | 3 Pages

The church was a great supporter of many scientific discoveries. During Galileo’s time the Jesuits had a well­known group of astronomers and scientists in Rome. Also many great scientists were encouraged to go on with their studies and received funding from the church and other church leaders. Many scientific findings during Galileo’s time were brought on by church leaders and church funding.

Read More
931 Words | 4 Pages

Landon Ladanyi Ms. Ambros AP Language 25, April, 2023 The Catholic Church, an Advocate for Science What do you think about the Catholic Church before the Enlightenment? Most likely, the answer from most people would be along the lines of an oppressive organization using religion to suppress the arts of science, but there is an alternative point of view that steers it towards the other view.

Read More
386 Words | 2 Pages

Prior to the Scientific Revolution, many Europeans were ignorant of basic earth sciences, there was little education and little knowledge. Knowledge that did exist was controlled by the Roman Catholic Church. Most scientific teachings in the Church were based on Biblical theory & ancient Greek science. During the Middle Ages, religion dominated society. Catholicism was the only recognized religion.

Read More
521 Words | 3 Pages

this was insanely popular and because the catholic church believed good created the earth perfect and in the perfect spot. the roman inquisition tried Galileo for not supporting the catholic church and he was on house arrest until his death. he changed the way people looked at religion and science by showing them they can have their own views and do not have to be followers to others

Read More
884 Words | 4 Pages

Galileo Galilei, an Italian scientist, was banned and silenced by the church because of his scientific ideas that did not meet Church principles. In a quote on page 20 in Shaping of the Modern World, “The holy Bible can never speak untruth. . . nobody will deny that it is often very abstruse, and may say things which are quite different from what its bare words signify,” Galileo insists that the bible is important, however, its rules are not set in stone meaning that

Read More
205 Words | 1 Pages

Religion was what drove the Scientific Revolution. The Scientific Revolution revovled around many of the ideals presented at the time of the Renaissance, Reformation, Englightenment, and the Age of Discovery (Hansen). The Church promoted the study of science in the Middle Ages (Hansen). Which lead to the findings for the real questions that could inspire doubt within the Church. Scieitists would find reasons to creation and set the Church into learning in ways presented earlier by the Jesuits (Hansen).

Read More
805 Words | 4 Pages

Obeying the churches command, he did what he was told and did not teach his findings. However, once his friend became pope as Urban VIII; realizing he might have a chance to publish his work, he released, “A Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems”. Again Galileo faced criticism and this time had to go to trial for his beliefs. After he was tried, the church banned him from teaching his works ever again and placed him on house arrest for the rest of his

Read More
1177 Words | 5 Pages

At the end of the Medieval Ages, the way the world worked had hardly been questioned, and all of the answers provided were based off of the teachings of the Catholic Church. Questioning the universe and that the scientific revolution that followed not only made sense, but society required it, to grow and understand the world and existence within it. Church leaders questioned whether or not this period of time would play a major impact on religion as a whole, and it certainly had the power to. The doubt that the Roman Catholic Church could not combat the new beliefs that science brought to life was the main conflict. The Church could be weakened by losing supporters, so there was much debate on what position each individual church should take on science.

Read More

More about Dbq Catholic Church In The 1600s

Open Document