Post #2: Drug Test Results 1. How did you score on the drug quiz? Better than expected or not as well as expected? The first time I took the drug quiz I made three out of five, which was surprising considering the information on the quiz was very detailed.
Drug testing could save money by removing drug users from receiving unnecessary financial help. The underlining pro of mandatory drug testing is it will potentially terminate the families who abuse the system. Drug testing could influence the lower class to stay off drugs.
A drug test is a biological specimen of urine, hair, blood, breath, sweat, or saliva. It is used to determine the presence of drugs or metabolism. In the Nfl drug tests are used for many reasons one of them being that they aren’t allowed and there is much information to prove that. All players are tested at least once per league year during training camp for substances of abuse including marijuana. This makes not so much sense because if there are reports that you were using any kind of drug your team could drug test you immediately.
Yes, I believe that it is necessary for police officers to be randomly drug tested. The duty that a police officer has is to protect and serve the city or town. If they are abusing drugs the officers cannot perform their duty to its fullest potential. More important though drug testing is important for the safety of civilians. If an officer is abusing drugs they could end up hurting civilians, whether getting into an accident on the road or accidentally shooting them thinking that they saw a weapon when there was not one.
Welfare should be given where it is need. One argument for not drug testing is that welfare is a cross walk that provides support and relief for those with true need. It is intended to revive individuals to get back on there own feet but not to have a long term relationship with the government and feeds off of it’s dependency. A second argument for not allowing drug test to be done is that parents will not be able to support for their children. Over 50% of the students attending a public school from the Pre-K to 12th grade in the state of North Carolina are either receiving free or reduced lunch.
The question came up whether it's fair to judge an entire system based on the few people who abuse the system? The response was you are not judging the whole system. Instead you are making the system more reliable. By drug testing you are rewarding the honest participants by making the application process easier. By getting rid of the dishonest
Drug testing individuals is not worth the money in the end because most people will not test positive. Most people tend to forget that most people receiving aid also are taxpayers. In 2010, nearly half the poor mother or near poor mothers were at least working part time (Cunha). If the people receiving aid are paying for the drug tests to they would probably rather keep that money then have it be wasted. Drug testing recipients is a waste of money since the government would be wasting more money on giving the tests then they would be
Excluding drugs from their lives could be a productivity boost and improve their overall health. Many US employers require drug tests before being cleared to work therefore this request for drug testing isn’t more invasive than going through the job acceptance process. This focus on jobs could help slowly eliminate long term welfare users. It might also prevent people from starting recreational drug use because it means losing their welfare, which may give them housing or a nutrition plan. There are some tradeoffs to including a drug test for welfare recipients.
According to statisticsbrain.com, their are 110,489,000 Americans who are on welfare and more and more Americans are applying for welfare each year. Many Americans rely on welfare for their families and for individual needs. Welfare recipients should not be permitted to take a drug test because drug testing is expensive for states and the country, drug testing is unconstitutional and welfare recipients do not do drugs any more than people who do not receive welfare. Drug testing is expensive and cost states a lot of money one drug test cost averages to about 42 dollars, not including the cost for equipment and hiring people to conduct the test. States start programs that require welfare recipients to take a drug test and the programs end up costing them up to 1 million or, even more, depending on the number of welfare recipients that reside in that state.
Working individuals are required to perform these drug tests in order to maintain employee standards for their given company (Besonen). Professional sports teams, the military, and many other institutions enforce drug testing to their employees (Besonen). In theory welfare recipients are basically employees of the state government in terms that they receive their funds, so the standards have reasonable regards to back them up
Then being drug free would improve their chances of better employment and better their lives. Creating a drug testing policy is really
However many people question whether the money is being misused or not. Although people may misuse the welfare assistance for drugs or to support a drug habit, there are many families who make use from the money they are given therefore drug testing welfare patients should not be mandatory. Historically, many people around the United States have
During a sport all the athletes are required to do drug testing, whether or not they have drugs in their system. These athletes take a urine test which is then sent to a lab. Although that is very effective, some drugs do not show up in the urine like alcohol, oxycodone, methadone to name a few. If sport teams do both urine and blood testing, they could rule out more
If pill testing is confirmed, it will encourage people to bring all types of drugs to events, they will be allowed to bring them in, however it is the users choice whether or not they choose to use it. If pill testing is used, it should be compulsory for all people who are carrying drugs to put them through this machine so that they know exactly what is going into their body. The government have spent thousands trying to change people’s minds on using drugs with educational campaigns and advertisements, however, these do not seem to be working and another approach which is pill testing is recommended by many people. These campaigns and advertisements were ignored by the majority of users and which is why pill testing should be used. Pill testing has been proven to be a lot more effective at saving lives, and is a much cheaper alternative and is not using tax payer’s money to prosecute young people.
This is due to the past horrors that had been revealed in the 1950’s and 1960’s. Since then, human testing is scrutinized and rarely used in modern society; it is practically banned. I believe that the only way we can learn precisely how certain drugs affect the human body is to test on the most accurate model: the human body. Although controversial in society, we can use those who are deemed as “morally unfit” (Lasagna 452). Those that are seen as the scum of the earth, child molesters, rapists, murderers and other violent crime offenders, can actually help benefit society in some way.
