I propose amendment to repeal the 22nd amendment of a two term limit on presidency. I believe that this amendment should be repealed because many presidents have proven that they are worthy of having more than two terms of presidency. For example, Franklin D. Rosevelt won 4 connective presidential elections and was the only president to be elected by the people for more than 2 terms. Franklin D. Rosevelt was doing so much good for the people of the United States, that they didn’t want his presidency to end at just 2 terms. He proved that he was preforming all of the duties that are essential to the president of the United States. The only reason Franklin D. Rosevelt left office is because of his death in 1945.
Before Franklin D. Roosevelt won these 4 consecutive presidential elections, and the government decided that limiting a president to 2 terms might be a good idea, presidents were allowed to serve as many terms as they could win. The only reason why another president did not serve more that 2 terms is because the people did not anyone into a 3rd term. Another president has not yet proven to the people of the U.S. that they deserve another term beyond their second.
…show more content…
and the government were afraid that if a president served more than two terms, it would lead to a sort of monarchy, and the president would act similar to a king. I personally believe that this is not possible due to the many checks and balances between the three branches of government. While the president may veto a law that is passed by congress, congress can then override that veto with a 2/3 vote by both the legislative and judicial branches. The Supreme court can “check” Congress by delaying a law to be unconstitutional. While the members of the Supreme Court are appointed by the president, they must be approved first by Congress. All of these checks and balances act together to ensure that the president does not have too much