ipl-logo

Essay On Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing

2797 Words12 Pages

100 million animals are killed in United States laboratories for drug, chemical, food and, cosmetics testing. Over a hundred daily use products get tested on animal’s daily. Animal testing is for all sorts of animal’s such as rabbits, mice, dogs, cats and, monkeys etc. Scientists are trying to find a way to put animal drug testing to an end. They have made a humane-on-a-chip. Pros and Cons for animal testing, example con for animal testing would be killing millions of animals each year and that is a horrible thing for those innocent animals. Humans and animals do share a lot of genes, but they function in a different way.
“Animal testing has contributed to many life saving cures and treatments”(Should Animals Be Used for Scientific or Commercial …show more content…

Here are some of the viable alternatives besides the human on the chip. The In-Vitro was created by National Academy of Sciences in 2007. They test the product or chemical in a glass test tube to study to see how the cell or tissue culture works. Human Brain Imaging is brain scanning or imaging techniques is now possible to conduct useable data and statistics is more useful than the questionable data collected from cutting into the brains of monkeys, cats and rats. Human blood testing instead of killing hundreds of thousand rabbit’s each year in the “pyrogen” test. The pyrogen test is when the put a substance in a rabbit’s body to make the rabbit have a fever and they see what drug will help it go down. Scientist can now study fever-causing contaminants in medicines by using human blood samples. Microdosing is given to a test patients of a drug which is within safe limits, advanced imaging techniques can be used to detect the way the body breaks down the

Show More
Related
885 Words | 4 Pages

Did you know that Earle Dickson made the Band-Aid in 1921? He made them because his newly wife would always burn and cut herself while making dinner in the kitchen. Then, after she would hurt herself because she could not really made the band-aid herself. Earle had to sit and put a piece of gaze with tape to the bleeding wound. She would hurt herself so much and Earle had to keep creating this bandages.

Read More
1640 Words | 7 Pages

It would help out rule compounds that won’t work in humans from animal tests. According to PETA with this technique it ‘allows the human brain to be safely studied down to the level of a single neuron, and researchers can even temporarily and reversibly induce brain disorders.’ Human volunteers can help replace the animals used for animal testing in which they have their brains damaged. Therefore, the alternatives will potentially start us in reaching the goal of reducing and possibly eliminating the need for any type of research on animals without compromising our ability to work toward discoveries that may ease suffering in humans as well as

Read More
917 Words | 4 Pages

Another way to test drugs is by integrating human cells with microchips that pump blood through the cell; people call this an ”organ-on-a-chip”, which allows researchers to stimulate human organs. There is already a chip called the “lung-on-a-chip”, and they are currently working on other organs, such as the bone, heart, and the brain. There is even computer simulations to see whether or not certain chemicals are safe. Scientists can use a computer program called Tox21, which is a program that is able to recreate what a chemical would do to the human body by using virtual models (Infobase 3). The morality of animal testing should not even be debatable.

Read More
635 Words | 3 Pages

68% of people oppose animal testing, but do you know how animal testing really works or its benefits? There is much controversy on animal testing all though some think it is inhumane, Animal testing is one of the best things for mankind. Animals can show us medical findings and medications, to save human lives and to advance human knowledge. Animals can help us in many ways,we need this in order to build better medications and medical assistance. There are huge benefits towards using animals for medical research.

Read More
459 Words | 2 Pages

There are pros of animal testing and also cons, you have to look at both sides. to get a fair look on what goes on in the labs. Some pros seem to outweigh the cons but some cons make the pros look so minimal that people like me want to stop animal testing all together. One pro is many cures and treatments of illnesses and diseases have been discovered due to animal testing. The testing also benefits humans because if the testing is done on animals then we don't need human “guinea pigs”.

Read More
631 Words | 3 Pages

How would you feel if you were a small helpless rabbit and you were constantly being shaved to put lotions on or having drops or cosmetics put in your eyes or chemicals and pills forced down your throat against your will. This is what is happening to hundreds of millions of animals around the world each year. More than 100 million animals are killed each year in the U.S in laboratories for biology lessons, medical training, curiosity-driven experimentation and chemical, drug, food and cosmetics testing.that is more than 3 animals each second. 72% of people surveyed believe that animal testing is unethical and an even larger 78% of people surveyed believed that development of other ways of testing products and chemicals is important. Today

Read More
910 Words | 4 Pages

In the year 1980 according to Ian Murnaghan, a graduate with a Bsc (Hons) and Msc, was when research for alternative animal testing technology began due to unethical issues, slow, and high expenses results. Years later, the nearly successful alternatives involved Vitro and Silico (Model and Computer based) testing. Gregory Mone, a Boston MA- based writer and author, in his article, “New Models in Cosmetics Replacing Animal Testing.” explains about Vitro and Silico testing in great detail then mentions that the research is “progressing faster” than experts have expected. Today animal testing has decreased due to scientists finding alternative methods of testing, finding results efficiently, and using ethical concepts involving cosmetics.

Read More
744 Words | 3 Pages

Animal testing has already become an easy way of testing that is proven that it works. If there is a way in the future that would be a better option than animal testing, then scientists would probably choose that. Animal testing is the best way to make sure we stay safe, and that animal testing saves lives in the

Read More
1409 Words | 6 Pages

Furthermore, scientists have found many ways to test products without using animals. These methods are more accurate because they are a closer representation to humans. These ways of testing are effective by using human cells and studying the way the substances affect the human cells that are in some kind of glass/container. An article from animal-testing.procon.org states “Alternative testing methods now exist that can replace the need for animals. In vitro (in glass) testing, such as studying cell cultures in a petri dish, can produce more relevant results than animal testing because human cells can be used”.

Read More
848 Words | 4 Pages

Animal testing is not the most reliable way to determine if a drug is safe for human use. A study done by the U.S Food and Drug Administration showed that ninety two percent of drugs entering clinical trials fail to be approved (Capaldo, Theodora). Animal testing is also very expensive and by figuring out new ways to test drugs and products we can save millions of animals and dollars. We are now able to create computer models and simulations of human organs and the researches are able to predict the way new drugs will react in the human body (“Alternatives to Animal Testing”) Other alternatives include cell cultures, micro dosing, and even donated human tissue.

Read More
1209 Words | 5 Pages

Methods of testing devices exist; they are used as often as they possibly can be. However, there are still times when these materials don’t work well enough. Animal testing is only used when it is absolutely essential. Finding a way to keep humans alive and healthy is definitely one of those times of

Read More
605 Words | 3 Pages

There are other ways to test without animals. As an example, in vitro testing, such as studying cell cultures in a petri dish, human cells can be used in this experiment so it can produce more relevant results than animal testing. Next, microdosing, it can be used in human volunteers by donating the blood and then the blood will be analyzed. Besides that, artificial human skin, is made from sheets of human skin cells grown in test tubes and can produce more useful results. Microfluidic chips, which are lined with human cells and recreate the functions of human organs, are in advanced stages of development.

Read More
1268 Words | 6 Pages

In vitro, uses advanced computer techniques, one of the techniques are called organs chips. Organ chips have real human cells that were grown represent the structure and function of human organs and organ systems. “These chips can be used instead of animals in disease research, drug testing, and toxicity testing and have been shown to replicate human physiology, diseases, and drug responses more accurately than crude animal experiments do” (Alternatives to Animal Testing). Research with human volunteers is another way to replace animal testing. A method called “microdosing” can tell if a drug is a risky or not (Alternatives to Animal Testing).Volunteers are given an extremely small drug dose, and imaging techniques are used to monitor how the drug behaves in the body (Alternatives to Animal Testing).

Read More
769 Words | 4 Pages

An Estimated 100 million animals are used every year in the United States for scientific testing. Research on living animals has been practiced since at least 500 BC. Animals should be free and not locked up in cages to be tested on. But there is one positive thing about animal testing. Animal testing has contributed to many life-saving cures and treatments.

Read More
750 Words | 3 Pages

Namely, that there are father, cheaper and more effective scientific methods of testing drug, which don't require animal experimentation. These methods are more accurate at predicting human reactions than animal tests ever were. Modern methods include sophisticated tests using human cells and tissues, which are known as in

Read More

More about Essay On Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing

Related Topics

Open Document