Essay On Should Members Of Congress Have The Right To Express Themselves As A Delegate

I believe that members of congress should have the right to express themselves as a delegate or trustee. The reason why I choice both is because as a delegate it’s your obligation to carry out instructions or orders from those who you represent, and if they vote on a decision, you would have to go along with it or your chance as being re-elected is done. It’s tough being a delegate because you can’t please everyone when making a decision. People with no voice or opinion this is when delegate comes in and hear their story and how they want the delegate to represent them. This is great because the delegate would not be selfish on representing the citizen’s word on how they would like to live their life or what happens to them and other people

But at the same time the disadvantage is not good because some people are not capable of making the right decisions like Hobbe would say, “Throughout his life, Hobbes believed that the only true and correct form of government was the absolute monarchy. He argued this most forcefully in his landmark work, Leviathan. This belief stemmed from the central tenet of Hobbes' natural philosophy that human beings are, at their core, selfish creatures (par 5). Some individuals may make decisions only concerning his or her own personal problem and not really care of other people would feel about the situation. If the delegate goes against the citizen’s he’s representing and not speak up for them he may not have a sit in office as a delegate anymore, he may not get re-elected because of people not trusting him and not being able to provide for them again. Trustee is opposite of delegate they make the decision based on how they feel and what’s best for everyone else. They usually are willing to run the risk of losing