Essentialist Theory On Abortion

1 The year 1973 marked the time when women were granted the right to procure an abortion if the given pregnant was unwanted. Despite the fact that the ruling of the supreme court did not hold the rights to be absolute, the court argued that the rights must be weighed against competing state interests regarding maternal safety and the safe guarding paternal life

In as much as most feminist endorse some privileges to abortion, it is obvious that the issue of abortion cannot be derived to the interest of men against those of women. Consequently, women have a say on both side of the issue as leaders, activists and supports. As such, even within feminist perspectives on abortion, their views are varied on the grounds that serve to justify the act.

This premise is actually seconded by Darwin's theory of evolution that claims heterosexuality is basic for reproduction and the continuity of the human species, and that there exists regularity and consistency in most forms of sexual characteristics, showcased across periods and societies. Such views might present a hard critic of the structural perspective since it advocates that sexuality is stemmed in our biological form instead of the result of social conditioning. Similarly, an issue that might be raised of constructionists is that, if such persons considered as deviants face heterosexism and stigmatization, why would they opt to stand out' and face the wrath of a homophobic society? In addition, the theorists claim that all traits are products of social conditioning are questionable, since they fail to depict why transgender search sexual reassignment. Ultimately, the constructionist perspective cannot hold for those that typically perceive that they were conceived with the biological sexual parts that fail to tally with their psychological sexual

Even though researchers conform that of modern construction are the two words heterosexual and homosexual and that they fail to depict describe same sex or opposite sexual relations that were in existence prior to the modern times, they are ofr he view that that labels of variation have wanted implications among the stigmatized: as such, it is argued that a common label is a collective identity, this grants them the public conspicuity much needed in the struggle for equality. Persons might agonize prejudice, nevertheless, the reality of their experience and existence given recognition and endorsement by the labels of variation.

3Do Transsexuals have a Choice

Humanity has no choice being born with a predisposition of transgender or transsexual. The feeling of choice and of taking responsibility for the given choice is vital for the wellbeing of transgender persons. In as most transgender, persons are cocooned to the thought that surgery is the only option to go for them.

Most of the debate regarding the fate of transsexual persons revolves around the definition of choice. Most studies argue that a huge portion of the population have no discomfort in living in a standardized gender role. As such transsexual persons never beg for the ability to transform the functioning of humanity, rather their query is the ability of individuals to describe their own role, that involves the permanent