Gary Wickman Potential Danger Of Human Cloning

Can cloning full humans be beneficial to the medical field and useful for doctors and scientist when trying to help patients that need organs? Scientist don’t really know the answer to that question because they haven’t cloned a full human and there are many reasons as to why, including ethical and moral issues. But there are benefits of cloning some parts of the human body. There are too many issues that need to be discussed for cloning a full human. However, the idea of cloning cells and organs, from Acts of Libraries, it can help with diseases and transplants for people who are sick, explaining why it can be beneficial. There are both sides to every argument, in this topic there are people who say cloning is messes with human nature and

Wickman’s purpose is to convey the issues that come along with cloning. He maintains a strong and asserting notion in order to communicate in his potential advocates for being against cloning. He introduces and discusses the ideas that there are many medical issues of the genes being old for the new clone, the clones might not be accepted or treated equally in the community. Health concerns that deal with abnormalities. Then brings moral, ethical and legal issues into the equation. To conclude, he discusses the first cloned sheep Dolly and how she died of a rare disease. The blogger from Gm.org, in this article he defends the fact that cloning is not a benefit for society and there are many issues. The purpose of this article is to influence the community that cloning poses environmental and ethical issues. This article asserts a straightforward tone in order to impose upon the reader that cloning has too many risks. The article rejects the facts that others may say it’s a benefit to have cloning. Also including the fact about diversity is going to be long gone because cloning has the same genes over and over, the ending the article by claiming it is an unsafe and cruel experiment for any

According to the Acts for Libraries (2017), “it is a fantastic medical advancement that that provides us with a ready supply of organs for transplants, gives us alternative then relying on human donors, creates a new way to cure diseases and provides infertile couples with the chance to have biological children.” In other words, cloning can be very beneficial to society because there are multiple purposes that can come out of cloning, in addition cloning can help couples have children. Although I grant that the article is poorly organized, I still maintain that it raises an important issue regarding the experiment with Dolly the first sheep to be cloned. According to Gm.org (2009), “Did you know that more than 98% of clones are either malformed, stillborn, or die immediately after birth?” Essentially, they are saying clones are not worth going through all the trouble because this experiment is just faulty. This problem definitely questions if there are any benefits to cloning. However, does the evidence I’ve cited prove conclusively that there is no way of improving these techniques and advancing in the cloning world? While it is true that there were many trials to get Dolly, it does not necessarily follow that there will not be any benefits from these trial and errors. In the article from Act for Libraries