Global Leadership Journey Paper

Global Leadership Journey

Leadership is defined by most as the act of leading an organization or group of people. The Organizational Leadership (OL) degree program has provided a lucid, fluid, and often intriguing definition of OL, a definition of OL that has been developed, analyzed, molded, and implemented on a continually changing spectrum through application. Leadership is applicable to organizations, groups, and individuals not only the application within an organization, but also within an individual. Leadership should be viewed as a character trait that continually evolves and hopefully improves upon. An analytical approach will guide this paper and ultimately delve into OL from a practiced personal perspective within the law enforcement

Teams surmise the back bone of an organization; in the end a successful team is a group individuals that when working together produce the most beneficial outcome for an organization. How then does one construct the right group of people and ultimately who leads this solid group? Individual actions in an organization have a position within the leadership perspective of an organization; however, true dynamic evaluation lies within the relationship of individuals in relation to the groups in which they belong. To analyze individual and group interactions is to look at solid leadership. My foundational understanding of leadership was that of para military structure. Leaders were individuals that others followed simply because they were directed to. Throughout this program, through the analysis of various leadership styles and theories, my perception of leadership has broadened. Sound leadership is centered on a team concept, where input, ideas, solutions, and rewards are produced by every member of an

Mike was a supervisor within my office who consistently maintained an approachable, open, and honest demeanor with every employee. He was regularly approached with many issues he responded with honesty and often asked for feedback from the individuals he led. Mike continued this style of authentic leadership throughout his career and upon his retirement it was apparent how deeply he effected our organization, employees from all ranks throughout our over 7,000 employee organization attended his retirement. Many spoke about how his leadership style transformed the way they viewed leadership and eventually changed the way they led their employees. Mike demonstrated to me what authentic and driven leadership looked like; he was in fact the first opportunity for me to expand my professional knowledge of leadership. Professionally this leadership style serves as the foundation for which my leadership style evolves, transforms, and develops. Pathak best describes my interpersonal approach to authentic leadership, “Authentic leadership links together who you are as a person, your beliefs and values, how you lead and manage, your personality, thinking and behavior” (p. 52). My focus has been to lead organizational teams with an authentic and servant based foundation that instills trust and openness