ipl-logo

Iran Nuclear Deal Pros And Cons

1083 Words5 Pages

Within the media, there has been quite an uproar over the most recent interaction between the United States and Iran. This interaction was an agreement called the Iran Nuclear Deal, which has sparked controversy amongst the American people due to the fear of nuclear warfare. The Iran Nuclear deal is an agreement between the Islamic Republic of Iran and the P5+1, which is the group of world powers. These world powers include the permanent members of the United Nations Security Council, such as the United States, the United Kingdom, Russia, France, China, Germany and the European Union. The agreement is intended to ensure that Iran’s nuclear program will be “exclusively peaceful and mark a fundamental shift in their approach to this issue” (Vienna). …show more content…

The concept is to allow Iran to use nuclear energy, however restrict the production of weapons-grade plutonium. The core of their reactor, which is able to produce this weapon-grade plutonium, will not be taken out. However, it will be made inoperable. The spent fuel from this reactor, which could still be used to create a bomb, will be removed from the country. Similarly, no heavy water reactors will be built in Iran for fifteen years. Although this mainly sounds positive, there is the concern that, with the reactor still on Iranian soil, they would be able to make a bomb secretly. Iran might be difficult for atomic inspectors to monitor due to its size, underground facilities, and military bases. The Western Allies agreed that these inspections should be more intrusive and more invasive than before, primarily due to Iran’s “history of evasion, stonewalling and illicit procurements” (Broad and Pecanha). Iran has agreed to provide the International Atomic Energy Agency with greater access and more information into its nuclear programs. The agency has also been given the right to investigate sites or …show more content…

Foremost, the United Nations Security Council has already voted, coming to a unanimous agreement in favor of the deal. Pulling out of this deal during the final hour would bring about much negative attention. Likewise, the remaining members of the United Nations Security Council would continue to carry out their side of the deal. There is a widespread consensus that declining the deal would lead to war. Therefore, the predicted risk of rejecting the deal seems far greater than the risk of

Show More
Related
1118 Words | 5 Pages

The treaty was signed by Reagan and Mikhail Gorbachev. It was to eliminate and control the use of nuclear weapons that could fire long distances. All launchers that had a range of 500-5500 kilometers were to be destroyed. This was effective, but it also came to an end. It got rid of nearly 2,700 missiles.

Read More
479 Words | 2 Pages

In 1980, the Shah died and the militants wanted the hostage deal of Shah standing trial and taking the punishment for his crimes in exchange for the release of the hostages. So now with the Shah passing it was impossible for the Shah to stand trial and be convicted for the said crimes. Leaving the hostages useless to the militants. So its time for a new deal to be made. In exchange for the hostages, the United States would unfreeze the accounts of the Iranian

Read More
808 Words | 4 Pages

This gives Iran the opportunity to immediately resume it’s nuclear activity after the fifteen year timeline comes

Read More
1481 Words | 6 Pages

The US heavy-handedly pressured them to refrain from nuclear exports, specifically in the German-Brazilian deal. The US’ loud voice instilled the pact set forth in the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty of 1968. Until 1974 most nations had approached nuclear weapons and civilian uses of nuclear energy separately. Both sides in outlining their grievances towards each other often used article 4. “All the Parties to the Treaty undertake to facilitate, and have the right to participate in, the fullest possible exchange of equipment, materials and scientific and technological information for the peaceful uses of nuclear energy.”

Read More
923 Words | 4 Pages

It was clearly evident that the current Iranian president went against the “American Ideal” of a leader. However, since the U.S was getting what it wants it didn't matter what happened in the

Read More
1540 Words | 7 Pages

The spread of nuclear weapons is important because the United States can prevent any sort of nuclear conflict. Whether it is the US attacking another country, or another country attacking the US. After a group of Iranian students stormed the American embassy in Tehran, the US government was keeping a watchful eye on nuclear proliferation in the United States and in Iran. In January of 1979, Ronald Reagan was in Jacksonville when he made a statement regarding nuclear proliferation in the United States, “‘...Unilaterally the United States seems to be the only nation in the world that’s trying to stop the proliferation of nuclear weapons.’” (Rafshoon

Read More
302 Words | 2 Pages

Schlosser asserts that Iran shouldn’t be able to possess nuclear weapons due to the pervasive threat it will pose. He acknowledges that nuclear weapons haven’t been used since the World War II, which suggests that a nuclear war will never happen. In addition, Schlosser emphasizes the ubiquity of the belief that nuclear weapons serve as war deterrents between nuclear powers by quoting Kenneth Waltz. Schlosser agrees that the belief does describe recent situations but doesn’t portray the future.

Read More
563 Words | 3 Pages

The short story “The Lottery” by Shirley Jackson is about a village and community that follow their traditions. In the novel, The Giver by Lois Lowry Jonas wanted his fellow citizens to change and thereby give up Sameness. In the Giver, Luis Lowry's own memories emphasize the themes in The Giver, including the importance of individuality and freedom of choice, and the need for caring relationships between all human beings despite their differences. Jonas Said “We gained control of many things” (Lowry 34).

Read More
2472 Words | 10 Pages

The new approach pushed additionally the atomic issue to a bottleneck. Khomeini set little need on atomic advancement. In addition after the upheaval, a considerable lot of Iran's top researchers fled into outcast and the US expressed a worldwide crusade to hinder any atomic help to Iran. As indicated by Khomeini, atomic innovation was just suspicious western development thus the atomic yearning of Iran was declined down with the end of Shah Era. In this regard, the Eurodif assention and the agreement marked with France and Germany were scratched off by the Iranian Islamic Republic.

Read More
600 Words | 3 Pages

So, after President Obama publicized this pact, presidential candidates, Republican, Donald J. Trump and, Democrat, Hillary Clinton individually met with Netanyahu and discussed America’s affiliation with Israel and what the future awaits when the next President of the United States of America (POTUS) takes their place office. Clinton assured Netanyahu that she would remain by Israel’s side and will always offer American aid when needed. Clinton’s point of view towards Israel is benefited by the Israeli defense deal, she is in favor of the country, has a well-developed friendship with the country’s prime minister and obviously would not want any controversy between her country and Israel. Using common sense, aiding Israel helps America keep peace with it, if we were to take away all military support and overall protection towards the country then we would lose an ally, thus sparking tense issues between both countries and that is the last thing this country needs and wants. Avoidance of war and tension between countries is one of the many reasons, another is what the American citizens think on this deal.

Read More
177 Words | 1 Pages

Pakistan’s nuclear Jimmy Carter's agenda when he became president in early 1977 because he brought a significant commitment to reducing nuclear armaments and to checking nuclear proliferation. As the U.S. seeks to deter the possibility of terrorists gaining access to nuclear weapons, it must consider carefully its policies toward Pakistan. Despite Pakistan's arguments that its nuclear weapons are safely guarded, the U.S. must construct and implement policies that proactively thwart the unwelcome possibility of Pakistan's nuclear weapons falling into the wrong hands. The best chance for success will lie within a framework premised on a robust U.S.-Pakistan partnership based on trust and mutual understanding.

Read More
1337 Words | 6 Pages

Iran is posing a growing threat towards the United States. The Obama administration signed a deal with Iran that will cut off Iran’s uranium supply, but it won’t cut off their plutonium supply. Iran’s main objective in the long run is to bring death and war to the United States. Iran’s president Hassan Rouhani said in February in a death to America rally, "Our nuclear victory showed to the world that Iranians are capable of winning any battle, including diplomatic battles.” In addition, the United States gave Iran $11.7 billion dollars.

Read More
646 Words | 3 Pages

Getting Security Council approval would only happen if Iran did a major violation of the agreement and maybe not even then because of Iran's close relationship with

Read More
1580 Words | 7 Pages

Because this deal potentially makes Iran a nation with a nuclear threat, many people fear that it’s dangerous and not beneficial in any regard

Read More
959 Words | 4 Pages

Human Trafficking Solutions Human trafficking is an issue throughout the entire world that needs to be stopped, completely. Human trafficking is known as the illegal recruitment, transportation, transfer, harboring or receipt of people by threat or use of force such as coercion, abduction, fraud or even a position of vulnerability, typically for the purposes of forced labor or commercial sexual exploitation (“Human Trafficking”). Human trafficking is a global issue. At this time, there are insufficient resources to address human trafficking.

Read More

More about Iran Nuclear Deal Pros And Cons

Related Topics

Open Document