ipl-logo

Is ATT Justified Argument Against Net Neutrality?

802 Words4 Pages

Net Neutrality
Comcast and ATT are functioning together to eliminate the Net Neutrality act. This gives them the capacity to charge more for the websites we use the most. Net Neutrality needs to be preserved to keep everyone in the same lane giving everyone the same chance to flourish. On the other side, some companies are claiming that because of Net Neutrality businesses of all sizes are struggling to elevate their infrastructure (Press).
ATT believes that Net Neutrality must be demolished because it is a wall keeping them from expanding their infrastructure (Curtis). Many streaming sites like Netflix and Hulu are being overrun by free streaming sites and due to their loss in income, they are struggling to progress their legal business on the internet. They presuppose that if their websites were faster, while the rivals are slower, they can have an …show more content…

First off, both ideas bring security and a way to upgrade their infrastructure. The difference is how they view it. Proponents of Net Neutrality view security best when the community chooses what is seen or not rather than the government. Opponents view security best when the content is blocked before it reaches the community. Then there is infrastructure where Net Neutrality benefits the lower tiered businesses, whereas rivals of Net Neutrality benefit the higher tiered businesses. The lower tier needs the internet to grow and paying more for it is not at all helpful. The higher tier needs to grow also, but they can’t because the lack of benefits they can give to their customers through the fast lane. To make a common ground, the internet providers could make several plans, each benefiting a certain financial tier, and have the companies choose which they want. This way, the small companies no longer must pay more for what they don’t need while the big companies can provide a more premium quality website for their

Show More
Related
829 Words | 4 Pages

A barrier to entry is defined as “factors that make it difficult for new firms to enter the market.” (Pettinger 2014) With these huge barriers it will never be easy for new firms that don’t have the money or the customer base as larger firms. It’s unfair for companies to be able to monopolize an industry just because of the power they have. In a country like the United States where we have free reign on just about everything, why is that we are stuck with not having choices for internet providers?

Read More
961 Words | 4 Pages

Net-neutrality is the principle that providers of Internet services enable access to all contents with no prejudice or discrimination against sites or products regardless of the source. In December, the U.S. government repealed the national regulations that prevented “Internet Service Providers from blocking legal content, throttling traffic or prioritizing content on their broadband networks” in favor of a “looser set of requirements that ISPs disclose any blocking or prioritization of their own content.” In summary, the government has decided to change net-neutrality and make it easier to profit from. The government’s want, and subsequent success, to change the strict guidelines by which net-neutrality operated with is supported by the Chairman

Read More
1477 Words | 6 Pages

The first con of net neutrality is that it will prevent competition in the free market. If the internet is regulated by the government that will stifle the free market because if every company if forced to compete on a level playing then the best business won’t be able to rise to the cream of the crop through natural competition. If one ISP raises their prices then that person can just switch over to the company with cheaper rates. A free market is healthy not only for businesses but for the overall economy as well because it will force other companies to have step their game up in order

Read More
127 Words | 1 Pages

The Battle over net neutrality Network neutrality defines that Internet service providers should enable to all access to any contents and applications depending upon the web site with out broking any services. The Internet is neutral because it was built so Internet requires phone companies to treat all buyers, they cannot give extra leisure to buyers who are willing to pay for quicker and undisturbed. MoveOn.org, American library associations are some examples that are in favor network neutrality. This group argues about censorship risk increased when the Internet can selectivity block contents, others worried about slower transmission rates on their business diagram. Telecommunications and cable companies are opposing network neutrality

Read More
408 Words | 2 Pages

7 Third, network providers might want to give a traffic advantage to their content partners or to their own content, 8 reserving a fast track for favored content partners-like movie studios or television networks-who want their streaming media to flow uninterrupted to consumers; conversely, network providers would not protect the flow of content (or even slow down content) from non-partners, competitors, amateurs, and end-users.0 The principle of network neutrality holds that, in general, network providers may not discriminate against content, sites, or applications." ' Putting the principle into practice is more complicated than it might at first

Read More
1928 Words | 8 Pages

Choi’s analysis, CP’s could potentially create an advantage for themselves while also harming ISP’s under a neutral net. Due to ISP’s being required to provide the same quality of internet (speed) to everyone, a company that uses substantially more resources will get the same treatment as a company who hardly uses network resources. ISP’s, on the other hand, want deregulation, so that CP’s who use an extraordinary amount of network bandwidth could be charged more appropriately compared to a smaller company not using as much data. As with Mr. Hong’s article, both social welfare and ISP’s will benefit more in the long term with

Read More
1148 Words | 5 Pages

The internet is a big part of most people's’ lives and they want to be able to use it fast and reliably. Net neutrality, the principle that Internet service providers should enable access to all content and applications regardless of the source, and without favoring or blocking particular products or website, is what allows people to do this. It keeps companies from slowing down their competition and raising their prices. Now, net neutrality has been repealed, which means that internet service providers and other companies can slow down their competition and raise their prices. For some people this is not a problem but for people who do not have as much money, it can mean that they won't be able to afford these things.

Read More
1835 Words | 8 Pages

In simpler terms, this means that the internet service providers could potentially allow the businesses who pay more to have their websites and internet data be at faster speeds than other businesses and websites. Some will argue against this, but without net neutrality forcing the internet providers to have equal internet for anyone and everyone on both sides of the equation, it would not be too hard for these businesses to change a few minor things. In fact, in a court case, Verizon v FCC that happened in 2013, the attorney for Verizon said that the company may be interested in paid prioritization (“Will the FCC’s,” 2018). Now while this did happen in 2013, there is still the fact that a representative of Verizon stated they would not be opposed to paid prioritization. With the rules barring that line of thought gone though, who is to say that Verizon will not jump on the change to be able to allow some changes to make paid prioritization a

Read More
1730 Words | 7 Pages

Thanks to the internet, many young people have been able to create application for phones, tables, etc., that in some way has become a helpful tool for someone anywhere in the world. Without net neutrality, innovation would become a slow lane, that would only become faster if innovators, students or small businesses are able to afford paying the high prices for a better

Read More
1608 Words | 7 Pages

The open internet is in danger of facing a worldwide crisis. Just imagine trying to access your favorite sites and apps, but a payment is required in order to access them. Well, Ajit Pai, chairman of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), has plans underway to end the principle that allows us to access the internet without many restrictions. This principle is known as net neutrality. Net neutrality is the principle that allows all people to use the internet freely without internet companies setting their own restrictions on certain things.

Read More
503 Words | 3 Pages

Net Neutrality is such a problem for today's people. So what is the government going to do about NEt neutrality? Net neutrality has been around since 2015. “ Starting in 2015, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has had protections in place to prevent broadband providers from doing just that. But now, the Trump FCC is moving to do away with those protections.” states ACLU in their article.

Read More
90 Words | 1 Pages

I am in favor of network neutrality, because it has more pros than cons. With network neutrality I feel more using safe, I feel a sense of equality. Knowing that I am not being discriminated or charge differentially based on my usage. Knowing that everyone with AT&T is receiving the same internet speeds as I. And the internet as always worked as a network neutrality, and it was fine before so what is point of trying to change. As long as the internet remains open then I see no problem.

Read More
516 Words | 3 Pages

If providers do decide to take the greedy approach they would greatly prosper from it, “more than half of all Americans have no choice in their provider, and 87 percent of rural Americans have no choice”. If people have no choice of what provider they can have and the prices go up, they can not do anything to get around the prices except for not using internet entirely. Taking away net neutrality is almost like taking away our freedom of speech, most people connect and talk to other people via internet apps like Facebook and Skype. If you take away people’s ability to post their own beliefs and views then you are basically taking that right away if they had it

Read More
1137 Words | 5 Pages

Net neutrality is the basic principle that everything on the World Wide Web, which is coming known as the Internet, must not be discriminated against by Internet service providers, the government, or any other ruling interest. Net neutrality is the fight to preserve that notion before Internet service providers decide not everything is meant for you to see. In basic terms the majority shareholders of Internet service providers, being Comcast, Time Warner Cable and Cox Communications are censoring and slowing down the Internet unless the websites pay them a hefty fee. If this article by Nilay Patel was written to persuade the greater audiences of these atrocities, the youth, for example, it would be written totally differently, we are here to

Read More
672 Words | 3 Pages

Imagine a world in which the internet is broken up into fast and slow lanes, that you must pay to access certain websites or pay to get more speed on sites. That is what FCC Chairman Ajit Pai wants to do. He wants to destroy net neutrality. Net neutrality is the principle that everything and everyone on the internet is treated the same and not to discriminate or charge differently by user, content, website, platform, application, type of attached equipment, or method of communication. This includes throttling websites unless you pay or outright blocking websites that the Internet Service Providers don’t want you to access such as services that rivals their own.

Read More

More about Is ATT Justified Argument Against Net Neutrality?

Related Topics

Open Document