More handpicked essays just for you.
Analyse and compare and contrast leadership theory
Leadership theories(essay
Analyse and compare and contrast leadership theory
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Analyse and compare and contrast leadership theory
Part 1: Analyse the scenario of the public health leader, presented in the Australian public health context using the Australian Health Leadership Framework [1000 words]. The public health leader in this scenario displayed great advocacy skills in her leadership roles over several years. For instance, this advocacy demonstrated strong leadership. This public health leader has played a critical role in addressing the challenges using a certain leadership style displayed within the Australian healthcare system framework. In this scenario, the leader demonstrated and outlined several reasons why individuals with strong leadership skills are essential: • They can adapt to change more readily.
Health and social care in the recent era needs effective leadership and management in order to make their service successful. It is noticed that proper management is required for the change implemented within health or social care organisation because integration of change with the goals is important phase. Health care management and leadership is the growing profession in which opportunities for both indirect and direct care settings has been increasing. Healthcare organisations are considered as the dynamic and complex business setting that needs effective management and leadership techniques or approaches in order to make sure that the individuals are provided with effectual services. While on the other hand, it is observed that various
Leadership has many definitions. Chin, Desormeaux, and Sawyer (2016) define leadership as a relationship between followers and a leader with the intent to promote change through a mutual vision. Therefore, leaders are active influences in the outcome of organizations, through their decision-making, strategies, and influence on followers (Dinh et al., 2014). Additionally, in the nursing context, it has been documented that a leader 's style plays a factor in patient outcomes (Fischer, 2016). Indeed, in an ever-changing, complex health care environment, nursing leadership has become a crucial factor in managing challenges and maintaining patient safety (Fischer, 2016).
My basic leadership philosophy is providing the highest quality service and performance possible to everyone that I am encounter. It is a set of principles for me to guiding and controlling the performance of an organization. It is also a foundation for me to achieve my leadership goal and have strategies to accomplish my mission and values. At first, I believe that a success leadership must shape the vision and know how to turning it into reality. I believe in a strong leader that know all about control and give clear expectations to their followers.
Often, the difference between leadership and management has been a topic of debate especially in the business community. Presently, managers are predominantly the ‘administrators’ while the leaders motivate organizations and employees to change. However, the terms management and leadership are usually considered synonymous which neglects the significant overlap between the two terms. This paper hopes to share the differences between leadership and management including the characteristics of successful leaders in comparing with ordinary managers. Leadership versus Management
Leadership and management are both skills that can be very useful in everyday situations as well as career areas; especially the health care field. Leadership can be seen as more of a natural characteristic where management can be used in a more professional manner such as a workplace. Some characteristics that a leader possesses are confidence, optimism, passion, courage, and integrity. Managers on the other hand, possess characteristics that are more authoritative, but it can be said that there are many qualities that intercept between both leadership and management. After completing the modules, it has become clear to me that there are areas within leadership and management that I excel in as well as areas within the concept that I can
In spite of the fact that’ leadership analysis’ is the art of breaking down a leader into basic psychological components for study and use by academics and practitioners, a sound leadership analyses
Leadership has been defined in a variety of ways, there are multiple authors and theorists who have tried to define and understand leadership, all leading to varying theories and conclusions, but one thing that is universally understood is the importance of effective leadership and how someone with good leadership skills can impact so many people around them. (Kakabadse and Kakabadse, 1999; Yukl, 2002; Northouse,2013) The main components that have been identified to play a role in leadership are relations between leader and subordinates, interaction form between leader and followers, the influence that the leader has, the way in which the leader behaves and finally a leader’s traits. (Yukl, 2002) These elements that make up a leader, are then used as building blocks to identify the way in which each specific leader deals with its followers.
Leaders come in many different shapes and forms. Some leaders only care about the business and task at hand, some leaders care too much for their employees, and other leaders have a great mix of both worlds; those are the types of leaders to have in every company. Leaders need to be fully invested not only in the business to succeed, but they need to make sure their employees are taken care of just as well as the company. Within this paper will discuss the reasons that leaders need to be involved not only within the business, but with the employees too. Theodore Roosevelt described how a caring leader should be in the workforce.
Leaders are made, not born. The Great Man Theory suggests that people inherit qualities and traits that make them better suited for leadership. “To suggest that leaders do not enter the world with extraordinary endowment is to imply that people enter the world with equal abilities, with equal talents.” (Thomas Carlyle 1840) While it is true that there are certain characteristics that leaders are born with that predispose them to become leaders, the influence of these characteristics are often overexaggerated.
1. UNDERSTAND THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT AND LEADERSHIP 1.1 Explain the link between strategic leadership and management. A power is the augmentation between crucial organization also, their objective. This is an outcome of a movement that affiliation gets their looked for errands and targets and the organization is accountable for people and resources in a unit as demonstrated by rules or qualities that have starting now been set while the power set a going to the people in get-together. Incredible activity and effective organization are reliably the key of accomplishment in any affiliation so both of these are the capacities which setting off one beside the other without organization a better than average power can
In this regard, leaders and managers can appear at any level of an organisation and are not exclusive of each other (Germano, 2010). Leadership theories identify leaders based upon traits as well as how their influence and power is used to achieve organizational goals and objectives (Germano, 2010). As such, trait based characteristics include leaders such as autocratic, democratic, bureaucratic and charismatic. On the other hand, leadership that is viewed from the perspective of the exchange of power and its utilisation to secure outcomes, are situational, transactional and transformational leaders (Germano, 2010). It is of paramount importance to consider the different types of theories of management and leadership and their potential impact on organizational strategy being that management and leadership plays a vital role in the success of businesses.
This paper is going to encompass different leadership theories and their relevance to my own personal personality and method of leadership. There will be information on the advantages and disadvantages of the leadership theories and information on each including examples. The purpose of this paper is to view various kinds of leadership theories and apply them to a real-life scenario. Leadership Theories There are quite a few different leadership theories available for people to take information from and use in business settings and even personal settings.
Different scholars identified various kinds of leadership styles that affect the job performance, satisfaction and learning and development of subordinates. Warrick, D.D (1981) cited that there are no doubt variables other than a leader’s style that affect employee performance and development but leadership style plays a significant role and not to be underestimated. An awareness of leadership styles and their consequences are very important because it may either facilitate or inhabit skill development. The major theories on leadership are the traits, leadership styles and contingency theories.
‘Organizations provide its managers with legitimate authority to lead, but there is no assurance that they will be able to lead effectively’ (Lunenburg, 2011). Organizational success usually requires a combination of both management and leadership. In today’s dynamic work environment, leaders are expected to challenge the present state of affairs, and to motivate and convince organization members. Managers are needed to assist in creating and maintaining a positive and well-functioning workplace. ‘Leadership and management are often considered practically overlapping concepts’ (Bohoris and Vorria, 2007, p. 1).
