When the No Child Left Behind was first created in 1965, known as the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA). This gave public schools more funding for the school and gave additional support to the lower class students. Which is a really good thing because then the schools receive chances to improve the resources available to students. The most recent reauthorization renamed ESEA to No Child Left Behind. This then proclaimed that the students are all being taught the same thing. It also tries to ensure that everyone is able to pass that class or grade. (New America Foundation) Through the course of evaluating No Child Left Behind, confronting many problems, explaining existing issues, providing simple adjustments, and stating multiple benefits.
People who grew up without No Child Left Behind seem to try harder, and if they didn’t want to go through the grade again then they would try their very best
…show more content…
This would be a great solution because the parent with high school students should not be as willing to hold their hand. They should be there for guidance. Majority of high school students don’t want to go too far away from home just because of the fact that parents are so willing to do whatever their child might need in life. From a parent’s perspective, it is understandable that they want to make the best life for their child, but when is that kid going to know that it is their life and no one owns it. Standardized tests should admit a reward system to go along with it, and students should be able to know exactly where they stand in the spectrum rather than just be given a “you are average” feeling. The reward system should be good enough where the students actually want it but it should not just be for the people that do really well on the test. It should be for any student that has shown growth over their worst