“The debate about animal rights goes on and on without anyone getting to any real conclusion” A source from occupytheory.org once said. Animals that are not being tested for products save the economy a lot of money and why waste a lot of money for tests that may not even be reliable.
Having animal rights insure that our animals won’t be abused or mistreated. If proceeding with animal rights animals won’t be killed to make clothing. Animal rights should be in forced more have strict punishments for people who don’t follow them because having animal rights means no animals will be abused and our economy would be able to save more money because of less animal testings that would be happening, lastly animals wouldn’t be killed for clothing.
With animal rights in full motion we can save testing expenses and animals lives. Did you know that each year more than 100 million animals are tested each year and reasons can be tracked to medical training, food, and cosmetics testing. If proceeding with animal rights it would cut down on the tests and
…show more content…
In 2008 the Yukon News reported that in shelters a total of of 76,181 cats and dogs were euthanized in Canada and that 6,000 of those animals were considered healthy. When you think of an animal shelter you think of new beginnings for animals and a safe place but it can be hard when you're faced with the reality. Many abandoned animals end up in pitiful shelters that are nothing more than shacks without walls and have no protection from the weather, where animals are often left to die from exposure, disease, or fights with other animals. In California, a cat was strangled to death by his owners because an animal shelter had a waiting list and a $150 surrender fee. This is very cruel to animals who just want to find a new loving home, they can’t say yes or no, they definitely can't resist.