ipl-logo

Persuasive Essay On Death Row Inmates

774 Words4 Pages

Death Row inmates are going to die anyway. Why not save the innocent lives of animals while also helping society and pay their debt to society by volunteering? Innocent rodents are being drugged and tested on against their will. All species have their own anatomy. The products and drugs that are being tested on the animals are unreliable for the human body. With the inmates consent, of course, those who are waiting for execution have an option to help for the greater good. The inmates are not innocent in most cases, so testing should be allowed if they agree. If inmates have diseases like HIV and AIDS or cancer, they should be given the option to join research studies and test medication. We get accurate results and saves tax payers money. It doesn't put us on the inmate’s level of cruelty because it would be their option to volunteer. People are going to be against this idea because they believe inmates will be plucked for testing against their will. Testing products and drugs on death row inmates rather than innocent unwilling animals would definitely have a better outcome for the …show more content…

Rats, mice, guinea pigs, rabbits and other rodents are being forced to swallow or inhale immense amounts of test substance. They have to endure the pain of chemicals eating away at their sensitive eyes and skin. The results of animals testing are often unreliable or not applicable to humans. Why would the inmates sacrifice their body for testing? That is a really good question. Since a criminal is convicted of such a heinous crime and sentenced to death with no more appeals left; if, that is if they have a change of heart they should sacrifice their body. Its costs $137 million every year to put an inmate on death penalty and it costs more to execute a person than imprison them for life. The prison can also make this rule mandatory to test drugs and

Show More
Related
1835 Words | 8 Pages

Prisoners would be able to get all the information they needed. Animals would no longer have to go through pain and suffering and taxpayers could finally pay for something that is more beneficial for them. As long as the phases are followed and as long as the prisoners are treated with respect then they would be qualified for the job as a volunteer clinical trial

Read More
616 Words | 3 Pages

The Uncut Version of Prison by Andrew Johnson Andrew Johnson's life narrative is marked by significant challenges and transformative experiences. Expelled from his home at the age of 13, he encountered issues with substance abuse and minor criminal activities. His trajectory led him to 18 years of incarceration within California’s penal system, an experience that profoundly illuminated both personal shortcomings and systemic flaws within the justice framework. During his time in maximum security prisons, Johnson demonstrated resilience and commitment to self-improvement by obtaining his GED, two Associate of Arts degrees, and two Associate of Arts for Transfer degrees. Upon his release, he pursued higher education full-time at California State University, San

Read More
743 Words | 3 Pages

So the argument for animal tests dissolves. Furthermore, apparently the USA wastes more than 16 billion US dollars annually on animal testing. 16 billion dollars! If they invested this money on other projects such as welfare, this would save a lot of people without torturing

Read More
243 Words | 1 Pages

Poe uses many examples of irony within A Cask of Amontillado. The three examples of irony that will be discussed in this essay are, Montresor’s first words towards Fortunato, the conversation regarding the masons, and Montresor’s reaction to the crime. The first example of irony is Montresor’s first words towards Fortunato. Fortunato thinks Montresor is happy to see him because of his experience. Poe says, “My dear Fortunato you are luckily met” (237).

Read More
2625 Words | 11 Pages

They would also take the prisoners outside, tie them to stakes, and then proceed to test biological weapons on them, such as plague infested flea bombs. Another study involved locking the prisoners inside pressure chambers as human guinea pigs. They would do this to test just exactly how much the body could take before their eyes literally popped out of their heads. Others were taken outside during the coldest, harshest winter weather conditions until their limbs froze off from frostbite so that the doctors could experiment how to best treat the effects of frostbite and gangrene. Some were even hung upside down just to see how long it would take them to choke to death.

Read More
495 Words | 2 Pages

Testing on humans, specifically, death row inmates would be better than testing on animals when it comes to medical research. Both scientists and doctors have scientifically proven that even though animals are biologically similar to humans, they are not identical. Stacy Vale Karron, the author of Death Row Inmates in Clinical Trials: The Benefits of Human vs. Non-Human Subjects stated " There is empirical evidence showing that animal "models" are not accurate and cannot be relied upon for safety testing and disease research, therefore medical experimentation on humans is more effective in clinical trials toward the discovery of cures for human diseases than medical experimentation on animals " ( Karron 1 ). Scientists and doctors say that

Read More
314 Words | 2 Pages

This essay is on the topic of “Commercial Testing on Animals.” Commercial testing should be done on criminals on death row not animals. Commercial testing should be done on a person with the capital punishment because they are going to pass away eventually. If the person/s being tested on do not have a chance of parole, we might as well commercially test on them for the reason that they are death row. There are pros and cons to this topic.

Read More
1277 Words | 6 Pages

Death row inmates: Using for medical experiments “Every single year, more than 100 million animals are killed in U.S. laboratories because of medical testing” (peta.org). Of course, it is very beneficial that we test new medicines to detect, diagnose, and monitor new treatments. The inability to test new treatments would limit medical advances in fighting diseases such as cancer, heart disease, and diabetes. Some have suggested using death row inmates for medical testing which would eliminate the need to use animals. According to Debatewise, “Under our definition, this House should allow medical experiments on prisoners without consent under the supervision of U.S. Department of Health & Human Services” (Debatewise).

Read More
570 Words | 3 Pages

As you can see, we shouldn't test on animals because they still feel pain, their rights are still being violated, and it is cruel and inhumane. But we need everyone on board to create a better life for

Read More
1428 Words | 6 Pages

Death row inmates are going to die anyway, whereas an animal could be spared the effects of medical testing. Also, getting to test inmates would help research more be more accurate on a human. This could help research grow and find new medicine faster. Additionally, harming animals is a crime so it only makes sense to punish people who have already committed a crime. There is no reason animals should be harmed for drug testing when there are other resources that could be used.

Read More
1515 Words | 7 Pages

Also testing on inmates would give them a positive in their life, especially those who will be in locked up for the rest of their life. A huge advantage of testing on inmates is the amount of money saved. Testing on animals generally costs an enormous amount of money, as the animals must be fed, housed, and drugged with many different medications, and experimental substances. Animal testing occurs more than once a month every month, it’s almost constant. The biggest price of animal testing is, “The price of animals themselves, there are companies who breed animals specifically for testing and animals can be purchased through them” (Murnaghan).

Read More
820 Words | 4 Pages

When a person commits an act as ghastly as murder or sexual assault there needs to be a punishment that suits the crime. A person who kills other people should not deserve to live themselves.

Read More
571 Words | 3 Pages

Poisoning, shocking, burning, and killing animals is what happens in labs all around the world and most people support it because they think it can benefit us or think there just some dumb animals. But that’s not true these dumb animals that people are testing on are living breathing creatures that have emotions and can feel pain. Animals should not go through such suffering and to back up what I am trying to prove here are three reasons why animals should not be tested on. Wait! Hold up just one minute, before you put on your make up and perfume did you ever stop to think where all of your make up, soap, perfume, and cleaning products even come from?

Read More
606 Words | 3 Pages

Death Penalty: Abolish Execution Do people realize execution cost a lot of money? The death penalty was first recorded in 1808. In the United States twenty seven states still execute criminals. The method that’s usually used to killed people on death row is usually lethal injection. Voters should vote against the death penalty because killing anyone is inhumane, it cost money, and it doesn’t make criminals stop.

Read More
1506 Words | 7 Pages

As a utilitarian, I see this as creating positivity from the negativity of the world. From a utilitarian perspective, human pharmaceutical testing on prisoners would create a beneficial gain for society as a whole, and give scientists more accurate research. A simple opposition to my argument is that we do

Read More

More about Persuasive Essay On Death Row Inmates

Related Topics

Open Document