ipl-logo

Persuasive Essay On Gay Rights

457 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Analysis of what's wrong with gay marriage

In the discourse about gay people being allowed the right to marry, opponents have raised many arguments professing that it should be made illegal. Among the antagonists are most religious and moral conservatives who are apparently threatening the institution of gay marriage. The anti-gay combat has gone beyond mere arguments to treating gay people with disdain claiming that it is incompatible with their religious liberty. Unfortunately, for the Christian conservatives, the gay currently constitutes of a significant presence in sports, politics, families, and the workplace. There is still more to be done; however, projections of pervasive discrimination and bigotry do not elicit credibility anymore. The conservatives ought to come to terms with the fact that the gay will be treated as …show more content…

The tactic is appealing because nobody desires to be tarred as an adversary of religious freedom. They have however been unsuccessful in explaining why or how giving gays a treatment equal to that of any other normal human being can be unsuited with anybody’s religious liberty. According to the article Gay marriage: Why Supreme Court got it wrong, “By enshrining gay marriage as a “civil right,” the Court will be opening a floodgate of litigation against individuals and businesses that refuse to honor same-sex marriages because of religious convictions. After all, if gay marriage is a civil right, then anyone who opposes it is guilty of a civil rights violation” (Jeffress). Therefore, the debate about authorizing gay marriages in America concerns issues more profound that the gay couples’ status only. It revolves around the future of the civil law in America. The law can either be defined based on the rights and needs of citizens causing gay marriages to be legalized or the rules be put under the protectorate of religious decrees causing gay marriages to be

Show More
Related

Obergefell V. Hodges: Case Study

409 Words | 2 Pages

Obergefell v. Hodges (2014) The Obergefell v. Hodges (2014) case involved the marriage of same sex couples. Groups of same sex couples sued their state agencies to challenge the constitutionality of them refusing to recognize legal same sex marriages. Plaintiffs argued that the states’ statutes violated the Equal Protection Clause and Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment.

Read More

Obergefell V. Hodges (2015)

677 Words | 3 Pages

This paper focuses on the Supreme Court case Obergefell v. Hodges (2015). This paper will give an overview of the case, the major arguments made by the plaitiffs and the defendents, as well as how the case has affected other rulings. This case has answered many legal questions and will shape any future cases that deal with gay marriage, possibly even equal rights. Deatiled CH: James Obergefell and John Arthur was a same-sex couple and was married on July 11, 2013 on a medical transport plan on the tarmac at the airport in Baltimore, Maryland due to Arthur being unable to move (3,2) .

Read More

Rhetorical Analysis Of An Article By David Von Drehle

692 Words | 3 Pages

David Von Drehle’s article about the recent controversy in an elected Kentucky Clerk 's office describes Kim Davis ' refusal to issue same sex marriage licenses and stresses that it is not her place to do so. In this article, David Von Drehle uses strong rhetoric to convince the reader that it is not Kim Davis’ place to refuse to issue marriage licenses. He starts out with the phrase “The heat around gay marriage is obscuring what a simple distinction this actually is. But suppose the Rowan County Clerk was a devout Hindu” (Von Drehle Time)

Read More

14th Amendment Pros And Cons

759 Words | 4 Pages

The community is still in somewhat of a state of shock and resistance. They see gay couples as abnormal, instead of as a human being that lives differently than them. The community believes that their religious freedom is being stressed or threatened by gay couples, mainly because the judeo christian sacred bond of marriage between a man and a woman. Government officials, especially those that are tied to popular elections such as the House or Senate will most likely voice an opinion based off their voter base. If their voter base is heavily conservative christians they will most likely oppose this decision for personal ideology and having re election on their mind.

Read More

Short Story 'My Amendment From George Saunders' In Persuasion Nation

162 Words | 1 Pages

June 26, 2015 marks a milestone for a long-sought victory for equal rights movement for genders as the Supreme Court ruled by a 5-to-4 vote that the Constitution guarantees a right to Same-Sex Marriage (nytimes.com). In addition to the celebration of the LBGT community over the Supreme Court’s decision on June 26, gay people are continuing to win over the society’s oppositions arises from over the decades toward legalize Same-Sex-Marriage. In the short story “My Amendment” from George Saunders’ In Persuasion Nation, the author uses his satirical writing style to represents his ideas and opinions on today controversial issue in the world: marriage equality. In this satirical writing piece, Saunders creates a character names Ken Bryon, who considers

Read More

Supreme Court Cases: Obergefell Vs. Hodges

1241 Words | 5 Pages

Amanda Stevenson Dr. Woodiwiss PO 101 30 November 2015 _______________________________ On June 26, 2015, the United States Supreme Court ruled any state ban against gay marriage unconstitutional with the case of Obergefell v. Hodges. Ruling in favor of Obergefell, the court’s decision shook what was thought to be the “stable ground” of the United States. Stemming from similar cases presented in Ohio, Michigan, Kentucky, and Tennessee, Obergefell v. Hodges illuminated two objective questions: “Does the Fourteenth Amendment require a state to license a marriage between two people of the same sex?” and “Does the Fourteenth Amendment require a state to recognize a marriage between two people of the same sex that was legally licensed and performed

Read More

David Boonin's Response To Jeff Jordan

1192 Words | 5 Pages

David Boonin’s response to Jeff Jordan made great points. Boonin mentions that “marriage involves a public recognition of a personal relationship between two people and people who are married become eligible for various sorts of public benefits that are unavailable to unmarried couples” and that to take this away from homosexual couples makes it into a “public dilemma” (Boonin 247). I strongly agree with this claim, as it is basic to understand that regardless of your gender, race, or sexual orientation, you are entitled as a human to certain rights. It is a discrimination to try and retract this right from anyone because of their sexual orientation. Just as it would be to try and prevent marriages of different races or religious backgrounds.

Read More

Obergefell V. Hodges (2005)

2137 Words | 9 Pages

Hodges (2015) the Supreme Court held that the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment guarantees the right to marry as one of the fundamental liberties it protects, applying to same-sex couples the same as opposite-sex couples. This case was brought forward by numerous groups of same-sex couples who were suing their relevant state agencies to challenge the constitutionality of those states’ same-sex marriage laws. The Supreme Court found that there is no difference between same-sex marriages and opposite-sex marriages, therefore, the exclusion of same-sex couples from the right to marry violates the Due Process Clause. This is policy making because the Supreme Court forced states to change their laws by deciding that it was against the constitution to not only ban the recognition of same-sex marriages that occurred in states that allowed it, but also making same-sex marriage legal in all states. Government officials even those who do not believe in the law change must abide by it, by allowing same-sex couples their now legal right to be married and receive the benefits that opposite-sex married couples receive; changing the way that citizens and the government interact in societal ways but also financial

Read More

Brief Summary Of Article By Jack Pitney

1287 Words | 6 Pages

Summary of Articles: Article 1: The author, Jack Pitney, asserts that Same-Sex Marriage is a topic disagreed upon by Americans: whether it is an issue of legality in the Constitution, and whether it should be up to states or the federal government to make a decision. Pitney finds that the minority party in Congress has often sought to oppose legislation by the majority party citing that it should be a states’ rights issue. Yet, when there is a change in the majority, the once-minority party hypocritically defends the issue as being up to the national government. Most politicians prior to 2012 agreed that the issue of Same-Sex marriage was answered by DOMA (1996), and that a piece of legislation by the Federal Government would violate the powers defined in the Constitution. Article 2: Pew Research Center finds that opposition to homosexual marriage hit a high after Bill Clinton signed the DOMA (1996) and continued to remain high until 2007.

Read More

Summary Of William Bennett Against Gay Marriage

259 Words | 2 Pages

When debating the legalization of same sex marriage, religious reasoning and accusations of bigotry often provoke obstinance. Instead of reiterating those arguments, William J. Bennett, a prominent cultural conservative, former secretary of education, and author of The Book of Virtues, focuses on societal effects in his op-ed article, “Against Gay Marriage.” Though Bennett’s piece conveys partiality, it also attempts to discuss this issue scrupulously to ensure readers will consider his argument and perhaps accept his implications. While some of Bennett’s word choices convey tolerance of the gay community, his rhetoric incites readers to accept that preserving society requires marginalizing homosexuals.

Read More

Mike Huckabee Political Courage

504 Words | 3 Pages

Huckabee stated, “This ruling is not about marriage equality, it’s about marriage redefinition. This irrational, unconstitutional rejection of the expressed will of the people in over 30 states will prove to be one of the court’s most disastrous decisions, and they have had many” (“Mike Huckabee”). Former Arkansas Governor and Presidential Candidate Mike Huckabee opposes same sex marriage and believes Americans must defend, protect and preserve traditional marriage (“Values”).

Read More

Obergefell V. Hodges: The Future Of Same Sex Marriage

1594 Words | 7 Pages

The future of same-sex marriage has long been a question in the United States; on June 26, 2015, under the U.S. Supreme Court decision of Obergefell v. Hodges, the country finally got an answer. In a five to four decision, the Supreme court determined that under the Fourteenth Amendment, marriage between same- sex couples is legal in all fifty states. Under this decision, states that had previously banned same-sex marriage will have to recognize and permit same-sex marriage within their boundaries. The U.S. Supreme Court decision in Obergefell v. Hodges is a landmark decision that will not affect same-sex couples throughout the nation, but also every aspect of our society. Having been hired by a sociologist who wants to study the effect of

Read More

Essay On Gay Marriage In Texas

1500 Words | 6 Pages

A year later, opposition to same-sex marriage for religious reasons has become the focal point of demands that the Texas Legislature act in response (Ura, 2015). “I do think that it is very important that we don’t lose sight of the fact that part of religious freedom is that citizens do have that inherent right to not have to do things that put them at odds with their religion,” said State Representative Cecil Bell Jr., R-Magnolia. State Senator Charles Perry, a Lubbock Republican who described the ruling

Read More

Gay Rights Vs. The Civil Rights Movement

902 Words | 4 Pages

The Civil Rights Movement gained traction around the 1950s, paving the way for many other oppressed groups. These groups fought for different rights, but they still had a similar struggle to the original movement. One of these groups is the Gay Rights Movement. The comparison between the black civil rights movement and the gay civil rights movement is “typically a sensitive subject, even among liberals” (Williams). Some people believe that it is unfair to compare a fight for marriage to a fight to gain equality in every aspect.

Read More

Persuasive Essay On Gay Rights

912 Words | 4 Pages

To most ears, it probably sounds inoffensive. A little outdated and clinical, perhaps, but harmless enough: homosexual. But that five-syllable word has never been more loaded, more deliberately used and, to the ears of many gays and lesbians, more permissiveness. Homosexual’ is the ring of ‘colored’ now, in the way your grandmother might have used that term, except that it hasn’t been recover in the same way. Consider the following phrases: homosexual community, homosexual activist, homosexual marriage.

Read More

More about Persuasive Essay On Gay Rights

Related Topics

Open Document