ipl-logo

Persuasive Essay On Gun Control

1265 Words6 Pages

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed (“Second Amendment”). Though times have drastically changed since the second amendment was written, our right to protect ourselves should never change. With that statement, not everyone should be allowed to own a firearm. There are laws and restrictions to protect people from creating terrible situations. These limitations are put in place to allow law-abiding citizens security of their right to protect themselves. If laws take away all the guns from the good people, the only people who are going to have guns will be criminals. If lawbreakers are the only people who have guns, then the gun restrictions …show more content…

Firearms cannot do anything independently, excluding human control; therefore when a dangerous incident occurs and a gun is fired the attention of law enforcement first wants to know is who was responsible for the weapon being discharged. Gayle S. Trotter, a well-known gun control advocate, states, “Law-abiding gun owners will not accept blame for the acts of violent or deranged criminals. Nor do we believe the government should dictate what we can lawfully own and use to protect our families” (Trotter). Discussing upstanding citizens who are gun owners, Trotter’s statement is impeccable. These gun owners will do anything in their power to retain their rights to their weapons. However, through his assertion of what the government should or should not do, he is incorrect. The government should have a say in what types of guns citizens are using to protect their families. For example, guns that are used for household protection should be limited by the amount of ammunition that they can hold. There is absolutely no reason that a household gun should have an excessive number of rounds. The only thing the government concerns itself with is the danger that guns bring, not the protection that they can give. Most individuals would assume that the government would focus more on where criminals were getting guns than what law abiding citizens have for home

Show More
Related
1050 Words | 5 Pages

I do find Collin’s argument and purpose that “gun control is long overdue” important and persuasive, but I also think beyond gun control as gun’s don’t decide to kill people, people kill people. Taking away gun rights is also taking away an individual’s right to protect oneself. If gun rights are taken away, innocent people would be unarmed against intruders. According to a study at Harvard, nations that have more guns tend to have less crime.

Read More
1077 Words | 5 Pages

“As things now stand, deadly weapons are easily accessible, studies about the causes of gun violence are prohibited, and the super-political gun industry profits from death. ”Some people profit from the gun, some occupations such as killers, spies, and some more terrorists, do anything they can to get the goal. Some common people who may be victims of gun violence, their families or themselves may have been hurt. Because firearms are too easy to obtain at this time and are collected at this time so that gun violence can easily take place. We should ban the sale of firearms.

Read More
662 Words | 3 Pages

Many feel the government should enforce stronger gun control laws. However, advocates against stronger gun control present arguments against these proposals. Both sides believe they are right and the other is wrong, but the facts remain; stronger gun control laws need to be implemented and enforced in order to prevent further murders from occurring. Even though restrictive laws won't deter people from getting their hand on them, gun control laws should be implemented because it will reduce the amount of deaths by guns, reduce gun violence and other countries have implemented stricter gun laws and the outcomes have been good. Some people might argue that gun control is not needed, what is needed is education regarding guns and gun safety in

Read More
923 Words | 4 Pages

Every law abiding citizen should have the right to bear arms. Background The second amendment states “A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a Free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”

Read More
1906 Words | 8 Pages

When combining all of these factors of gun control laws, past and present, the result is not quite clear. While taking away all guns that contribute to violent crime would be brilliant on paper, it would limit the ability of citizens to protect themselves. Leaving many without proper means of home protection and subjected to violent crime. The absence of firearms in the hands of U.S. citizens could also cause an uproar across the country. The confusion, in regards to statistics and effectiveness of gun control laws, is due to the different interpretation of crime, which undoubtedly is due to prior bias by the interpreter.

Read More
597 Words | 3 Pages

There are sixty four thousand seven hundred forty seven gun stores in america, compared to the mere ten thousand eight hundred forty three. Guns have become so accessible to anyone. Many question whether civilians should be allowed to own and carry firearms. As stated in the Second amendment we are allow the right to bear arms. So the government can’t touch our firearms.

Read More
489 Words | 2 Pages

So when government wants to take guns away from law abiding citizens all they are accomplishing is giving criminals the upper hand. There is an old saying and it goes “if you outlaw guns only outlaws will have guns” and that is exactly true. Striping the people of their right to bear arms is more of a danger to the people than keeping guns in the first place.

Read More
963 Words | 4 Pages

A harder access to guns could prevent most criminals from committing their crime. People may claim gun regulations would take away their right to gun ownership, as the Second Amendment protects them. However, numerous amount of people have shown that they are not using guns for their actual purposes. It

Read More
1395 Words | 6 Pages

Some may view firearms as a murderous weapon, but we have the right to bear arms. The Second Amendment and the Right To Bear Arms have united states citizens the right to bear arms. Although, the Second Amendment stated, ‘A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms. Innocent citizens have and still are being brutally killed due to this amendment. Stricter gun control laws must be enacted to receive these types of weapons.

Read More
1386 Words | 6 Pages

According to the Second Amendment, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” The Second Amendment specifically states that “the right of the people to keep

Read More
991 Words | 4 Pages

C David Holman Mrs. Cottam English 11 1/1/15 Although having tighter gun control laws and more restrictions on gun owners might decrease gun related deaths, these laws will not stop the violence and crime associated with gun use. The 2nd amendment in the constitution states that “the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” The loss of this right would put too much power in the hands of the government and would limit the ability for citizens to protect themselves.

Read More
664 Words | 3 Pages

Therefore, any law that contradicts the constitution should not be ratified by any state and if one is ratified, the law should be challenged by the Supreme Court. The Constitution states, in the second amendment, that “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed” (Cornell University). The Second Amendment specifically gives all citizens the right to keep and bear arms. Those who favor gun control argue that the constitution states that a militia is necessary; a militia is defined as a civilian population to supplement the army in an emergency.

Read More
1169 Words | 5 Pages

Alexis Clarke Professor Frank English 110 29 October 2015 Gun Control Will Not Eliminate Crime The big issue of gun control in the United States, is that many people believe that it takes away the 2nd Amendment rights, which is the right to bear arms. Citizens of the United States are promised the the right to bear arms in the Constitution, and by applying gun control laws takes away that same right. Crime is high enough in cities with very few laws pertaining to gun control, but taking guns away from people who are registered with license will not solve the problem either. Placing more limitations on gun owners, particularly responsible gun owners, will not reduce gun violence.

Read More
1634 Words | 7 Pages

Everyday in the United States, ninety families are changed forever; guns claim an average of ninety lives every day in the United States, 33,000 lives in a single year. Gun control has been a debate in the United States for many years and is constantly thrusted back into the public’s attention by horrific shootings. These shootings constantly cause individuals to petition the government to place stricter and stricter regulations of guns. However, these policies cannot be the solution to this problem. To determine a solution that will be both effective and constitutional, we must look at statistics and research that has been conducted to determine the best course of action.

Read More
1063 Words | 5 Pages

The following argument is in favor of gun control. The restrictions on guns in place today are not nearly sufficient considering the level of gun violence seen on a daily basis. In the article “Stronger Gun Control Laws Will Save Lives” it is stated, “The fact is that very few federal laws regulate the manufacture, sale or possession of firearms, and those currently on the books are filled with loopholes or significantly tie the hands of law enforcement.” Arming citizens would not reduce crime or allow for self-defense, it would merely place guns into the wrong hands of people who are not trained enough or mentally stable to handle them. This is why there are so many school shootings and public massacres on television constantly broadcasted

Read More

More about Persuasive Essay On Gun Control

Related Topics

Open Document