Persuasive Essay On Human Cloning

With the advance of medicinal technology in the past century, and even decade, has come the advent of a new interesting, yet potentially terrifying technology: cloning, the ability to create an identical copy of any one human being utilizing the host’s genome. With the advances in this technology, it is possible to create a human embryo from a single skin cell of a healthy adult, creating a source from which to harvest stem cells which can be used to treat many diseases previously thought untreatable or uncured, and should this technology be allowed to advance, this embryo could be grown into a full, completely normal human baby. This new technology has split the thinking of many people into two halves: those that believe that human cloning

Should research continue and science be able to accommodate further growing these clones or just even part of the clones, “cloning could provide perfectly compatible body parts for persons who need them or… it could enable infertile couples and homosexuals to have ‘biological’ offspring” (Kontorovich). These uses of reproductive cloning technology show completely ethical and, should research be allowed to continue and the technology be allowed to perfect, completely safe ways that reproductive cloning can be used to improve lives of millions of people. As it is now, though, this technology is just regarded as completely unethical to even think about by the masses and pushed aside, leaving the voices of those who can see ethical uses for it drowned out in a cacophony of surface-minded objections. Supporters of improving cloning technology to capacitate these changes believe that society cannot go further down this route, where something that can improve millions of lives is thrown aside like garbage and never thought of again because of how it looks on the surface. Of course, people believe that clones could be seen as less human or shunned by society, thus making the thought of giving birth to them unethical on its own, and while in a vacuum this could be seen as a reasonable argument, it must be noted that clones walk about us every day, and they are not regarded any differently. Twins, who share identical sets of DNA are effectively the same as clones, however, they are not treated any differently by society, nor are any of them seen as less of a human person than the other (Easterbrook). Taking this into account, the assumption that reproductive cloning is inherently unethical can be safely quelled, as if twins