ipl-logo

Persuasive Essay On Net Neutrality

990 Words4 Pages

We think we have a democracy in the United States of America, the freedom of the people choosing how things are run. However, lately the people’s voices aren’t being heard. In fact, a policy was just put in place that 83% of Americans opposed, seems like the vast majority to me! Of course, I’m talking about Net Neutrality, which was just repealed despite the wishes of, let me say that again 83% of Americans, the obvious vast majority. But what is Net Neutrality anyways? Well, according to Dictionary.com in 2003, Net Neutrality is “the concept that broadband Internet service providers should provide nondiscriminatory access to Internet content, platforms, etc., and should not manipulate the transfer of data regardless of its source or destination.” …show more content…

And, from February 26th, 2015 onward, we have adopted the practices of Net Neutrality, which makes is so that ISPs cannot treat any website differently because of, for example, the content on that website or how much that website pays. But without Net Neutrality, ISPs basically control the internet. They are able to “throttle” or slow down certain websites for whatever reason they see fit, they can charge you different amounts of money to be able to see certain websites. For example, if you’ve ever looked at your parents cable bill/how they buy cable, if you have it, then you will notice that certain channels come in packages, the local channels like Fox 4 News being in the lowest package, and the more popular ones, such as cartoon network, HBO, and others costing more money in “bundles.” Well, according to the NY Times on Dec. 14, 2017 “Many consumer advocates have argued that if the rules get scrapped, broadband providers will begin selling the internet in bundles, not unlike how cable television is sold today,” for example, say you want access to stuff like Instagram and Twitter, those might be sold under a social media package, meanwhile you have to pay extra for a video watching package to get YouTube and Netflix. ISPs could do even …show more content…

According to USA Today on Dec. 20, 2017, “That’s when an internet provider such as Verizon or Comcast decides to charge services like YouTube or Amazon for faster access to users. Firms that decline to pay up could wind up in bumper-to-bumper slow lanes.” For example, say there are three companies, a large corporation, a local business, and a small family startup. The large corporation is able to give the ISP a lot of money, so the ISP makes sure their website loads up nice and fast. The local business is able to give the ISP a little bit of money, so their website can load, but not as fast as the corporation’s website can. Finally, the small family startup is barely able to pay the ISP anything, therefore their website takes a full 1-2 minutes to load. Can you see why that would be a problem? Small businesses, which a lot of the time now might only be on the internet now, would have to pay to even be able to load their websites. Which could cause them to never be seen, and therefore not be able to

Show More
Related
439 Words | 2 Pages

The rule of law is reflected as a core principle of our nation and vital to ordered liberty. To rightly govern the American rule of law it is essential to acknowledge the continuity between the American Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution. The United States of America “government” is framed by these two important documents. The principles of the Declaration of Independence constitute the foundation of the government based on the universal equality of all human beings, and the U.S. Constitution founds the political process that is to be followed by the elected officials in governing the people. One cannot be without the other; both are essential for a stable government.

Read More
885 Words | 4 Pages

For example, the author argues that increased power for the ISP’s would hurt the value of the internet. Yet the authors also admits that in most cases, businesses don’t have a reason to discriminate since innovation is what drives the internet’s growth, which in turn helps the ISP’s grow their

Read More
961 Words | 4 Pages

Net-neutrality is the principle that providers of Internet services enable access to all contents with no prejudice or discrimination against sites or products regardless of the source. In December, the U.S. government repealed the national regulations that prevented “Internet Service Providers from blocking legal content, throttling traffic or prioritizing content on their broadband networks” in favor of a “looser set of requirements that ISPs disclose any blocking or prioritization of their own content.” In summary, the government has decided to change net-neutrality and make it easier to profit from. The government’s want, and subsequent success, to change the strict guidelines by which net-neutrality operated with is supported by the Chairman

Read More
918 Words | 4 Pages

Although many consumers saw this rule as morally and financially efficient, firms saw the opposite. More regulation hinders a firm’s ability to innovate at a rapid pace; thus investors were less likely to put their money into broadband and wireless providers. It is clear that with this new rule, investment firms will be reinvigorated to circulate their money back into this industry. This positive benefit for investment firms (and ISPs as well) is a

Read More
895 Words | 4 Pages

The Internet is one of the most powerful tools of the modern age as a source of knowledge, entertainment and wealth generation. While a large majority of the population has no understanding of how the Internet actually works and how the content arrives at their computer they understand its importance. Currently, the biggest issue the media industry is facing is that of net neutrality. Net neutrality is the idea that Internet service providers (ISP’s) should not discriminate against information being sent over the Internet and all data packets must be treated equally regardless of source, type or content.

Read More
687 Words | 3 Pages

"Net Neutrality: What_Ñés the Big Deal? Since 2015, the Federal Communications Commission_Ñés (FCC) net neutrality bill has been requiring all Internet Service Providers (ISPs) to have equal internet speed, accessibility, service and content availability. Its purpose was to diminish competition between networks as well as provide users with an equally reliable spectrum of websites and resources regardless of the network it is on. The rules that were protected by net neutrality disabled networks from blocking lawful content, slowing the transmission of data, and from creating slow and fast lanes with the basis of who paid more.

Read More
338 Words | 2 Pages

Net neutrality is a proposal passed by former President Obama in 2015. The purpose of net neutrality is to keep internet free and open, so that everyone has equal right to communicate freely on Internet. Under net neutrality, Internet Service Providers like AT&T, Comcast, Verizon, and Digital West cannot speed up or slow down the internet, and block any content, websites, applications, and platforms and so on that people want to use. In a word, Internet Service Provider cannot interfere or manipulate the data. However, without net neutrality, Internet Service Providers like AT&T, Comcast, Verizon, and Digital West can make decisions to benefit their companies.

Read More
1148 Words | 5 Pages

The internet is a big part of most people's’ lives and they want to be able to use it fast and reliably. Net neutrality, the principle that Internet service providers should enable access to all content and applications regardless of the source, and without favoring or blocking particular products or website, is what allows people to do this. It keeps companies from slowing down their competition and raising their prices. Now, net neutrality has been repealed, which means that internet service providers and other companies can slow down their competition and raise their prices. For some people this is not a problem but for people who do not have as much money, it can mean that they won't be able to afford these things.

Read More
1730 Words | 7 Pages

Net neutrality has improved the overall state of the internet and played a role on the 80 percent of Americans that use the internet ("Internet"). The question is, what exactly is net neutrality? Net neutrality has a central idea that Internet Service Providers (ISPs) "should treat all content flowing through their cables and cell towers equally" (Finley). The value behind this is that ISPs should not discriminate against certain content by providing some content at a faster speed than others. The U.S population, before the Federal Communication Committee (FCC) voted to repeal it on December 2017, had a simple idea of what it was but did not imagine the benefit that it had brought for them.

Read More
805 Words | 4 Pages

Net neutrality is and has been a hotly debated topic. For over ten years heated discussions have taken place as to what exactly net neutrality is, what it means to stand on either side of the argument, and why it matters in the first place. The internet is used for such a wide array of purposes – information, staying in touch with relatives, entertainment, and employment to name a few – that it’s worth taking a second look at what might happen if amendments are made to the current regulations. Keeping in account this level of reliance on the internet, crippling current net neutrality laws would hinder entrepreneurship and lead to further monopolization of global industries. There is so much to lose by allowing the Federal Trade Commission to oversee what should rightfully remain under the governance of the Federal Communications Commissions.

Read More
890 Words | 4 Pages

Title II of the Communications Act involves the idea of “common carrier” and how broadband providers act as common carriers similar to how telephone networks. A common carrier simply means that a company will deliver goods (as in access to the internet) at set rates. So since net neutrality was embracing Title II, rules were created against blocking and discrimination of websites. Title II also helped protect consumers privacy rights. Section 222 within Title II requires “telecommunications carriers to protect customer proprietary network information.”

Read More
1495 Words | 6 Pages

Net Neutrality Since the creation of the internet, principles of net neutrality has been set. In 2003, Tim Wu originally coined the term “Network Neutrality” to describe the concept that internet service providers should treat all data on the Internet the same and not block, speed up or slow down traffic based on paid prioritization or other preferences (Wu 1). In 2015, under President Barack Obama, the strongest net neutrality rules as of yet, in which the FCC voted in favor for net neutrality and their decision to keep the internet free and open (Finley 2018). However, since President Trump’s rise to power, he appointed Ajit Pai to become the chairman of the FCC to break net neutrality.

Read More
612 Words | 3 Pages

The concept of net neutrality can make equality between peoples’ internet service and prevent carries from blocking or slowing down websites. If net neutrality comes to an end, carries will raise prices knowing many customers cannot afford the new prices. Therefore, they either spend extra money to get faster service or continue to be left behind. The internet has become very important to many and gives people the freedom to do whatever they want. The justification is only that companies are money hungry, and they do not care about others circumstances.

Read More
1061 Words | 5 Pages

Humans are unique in that we have been coded in such a way that our interpretation of literary texts have always varied, whether being influenced by religion, culture or ideology. Therefore actions, events, or beliefs may be justifiable or not depending on the individual. The Gothic Short story “The Cask of the Amontillado” By Edgar Allen Poe sheds light onto common human ambitions and characteristics, whether it is the lust for revenge, power, or class struggle. The story is told through a first person narrative in which the narrator gives the reader precise accounts on his endeavour for revenge. In “The Cask of The Amontillado” by Edgar Allen Poe, the interpretation of revenge as a theme varies as a result of reading it through different

Read More
909 Words | 4 Pages

No Net Neutrality: If there is no net neutrality, Internet service providers will have power to create their own internet traffic, so that they can extract more benefit from it. For example the service providers can charge more for companies for the services like YouTube, because it consumes more bandwidth comparing to normal websites. As we know without Net Neutrality internet will not exist, instead of free access to the websites the service providers will charge more for the customers.

Read More

More about Persuasive Essay On Net Neutrality

Related Topics

Open Document