ipl-logo

Persuasive Essay: The Use Of Atomic Bombs In WWII

484 Words2 Pages

The Use of Atomic Bombs in WWII Truman’s decision to drop the atomic bombs on Japan in WWII was not the correct course of action. In August 1945, two atomic bombs were dropped in Hiroshima and Nagasaki by the US. The decision was not the correct course of action because Japan was most likely already facing surrender, the US could have dropped a bomb in a less populated area, and it was not morally justified to kill innocent civilians. Japan was most likely planning to surrender before the US had dropped the atomic bombs, according to the U.S. Strategic Bombing Survey. Killing hundreds of thousands of innocent civilians, even though they were planning on surrendering, is not acceptable. The U.S. Strategic Bombing survey found that 74% of urban areas in Japan entertained doubts about a Japanese victory and nearly 50% in urban areas felt certain that victory for Japan was impossible (U.S. Strategic Bombing Survey, 1945). This proves that the Japanese would soon have surrendered, even without the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. …show more content…

Tokyo Bay would have been a much better location to bomb because it would destroy the emperor and other Japanese leaders. The bombs would still be taken as a very serious threat, and would cause the Japanese to surrender, without the need to kill so many people. During WWII, Japan had 3.2 million casualties, and contributing greatly to that number was wrong (Source 3). Also, the US faced the risk of upsetting the Japanese further by killing so many civilians, and causing hatred and danger to the US, but if they would have bombed a location like Tokyo Bay, they could have minimized death, anger, and still had the outcome of

Show More
Related

Drop The Bomb Dbq

345 Words | 2 Pages

Therefore knowing how the Japanese soldiers think about surrendering, the millions of lives saved by ending the war quickly and shortly, and the countless warnings given to the Japanese, I think dropping the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was warranted and

Read More

Why Should The United States Have Dropped The Bomb On Japan

355 Words | 2 Pages

Some of the reasons why the United States should have used the bomb on japan is because the United states have given Japan multiple times to surrender and they refused each offer. So since President Truman believed that using the bombs would help end the war sooner. One benefit of bombing Japan would mean that there would be fewer deaths because if they were to continue to fight it out many more lives would have been lost. So since President Truman believed that this would make Japan surrender easier the first bomb was dropped over Hiroshima and then the second one was dropped over Nagasaki. Many people beloved that the bomb should not have been used on Japan and one reason why was because it did take the lives of many innocent people.

Read More

Three Narratives Of Our Humanity By John W.

1403 Words | 6 Pages

The use of the atomic bomb when strategically compared to a land invasion, in fact prevented the loss of any U.S. soldiers lives, as well as the death of many Japanese citizens. Excerpts from “Three Narratives of our Humanity” by John W, debates whether or not the nuclear bombing was necessary to shock the Japanese into surrender and describes how the Japanese recall the war through a lens of their own victimization. An excerpt claims, “it is argued that the nuclear bombing of Hiroshima was necessary to shock the Japanese to surrender”. This presents a compelling argument supporting the ethicality of the bombings through its logical and strategic worth.

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of Atomic Bombing

417 Words | 2 Pages

In Hiroshima alone around 140,000 people were killed by the end of the year because of the bombing. In August 1945 President Truman decided to drop two atomic bombs on Japan. The U.S. shouldn’t have dropped the atomic bomb. Things would have been a lot different if they didn’t drop the bombs. Historians have been arguing that the atomic bombing didn’t lead to the Japan surrendering.

Read More

Truman Inhumane Analysis

300 Words | 2 Pages

The military would tell their soldiers that the kamikaze attacks were for the good of their country, which led the soldiers to believe that their patriotism and pride was more important than their own lives. The Japanese’s apathy for their people and their inhumane warfare needed to be stopped. The US found significant issues with firing of an atomic bomb, such as the civilian casualties it could cause and the post-war problems it could create with the Russians. Despite the possible repercussions of the atomic bomb, Truman would be right to fire off the atomic bomb into a major Japanese city. He would be right to do this because of how it would protect the american citizens from future attacks on American soil.

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of The Atomic Bomb

276 Words | 2 Pages

People would disagree because Japan would’ve surrendered without the bombs. August 6th the U.S. dropped an Atomic Bomb on Hiroshima. The bomb killed approximately 80,000 people. A second bomb was then dropped on Nagasaki three days later. It had killed around 40,000 people.

Read More

Should We Have Dropped The Atomic Bomb Persuasive Essay

852 Words | 4 Pages

In fact, Ralph A. Bard, Undersecretary of the Navy wrote to Secretary of War Stimson in a June 27, 1945 memorandum. “I define this decision as an emotional and reckless decision, Japanese government may be searching for some opportunity which they could use as a medium of surrender” (Bard). In fact, the Japanese government expressed desire to end the war, and would have accepted conditional surrender before the mainland invasion in November. The reason for dropping the bomb was forcing Japan to surrender unconditionally. In America’s opinion, Japan had lost the war; they did not have any capital to negotiate with.

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of Atomic Bombing

783 Words | 4 Pages

Many people have different opinions on rather the bomb should have been dropped or not, it just depends on your views of war and mass killings. Many say the U.S would have won even if they didn't use the bombs but without fighting this way.. Would the war be ended without killing many of our U.S soldiers? People think the bombs were uncalled for and we could have done this another way without taking thousands of lives. While others think Japan bombed us first so it’s the right thing to do.

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of Atomic Bombing

687 Words | 3 Pages

On August 6th and 9th, 1945, the United States dropped atomic bombs on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, respectively. The bombings marked the first and only time nuclear weapons have been used in warfare, with an estimated total of 200,000 people killed as a result. While the bombings effectively brought World War II to an end, they remain a highly controversial moment in history, with many arguing that the bombings were unnecessary and even immoral. I firmly believe that we should not have dropped atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The reasons for my position are many, including the devastating death toll, the questionable decision-making of American officials, and the ultimately unnecessary nature of the attacks.

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of The Bombing Of Hiroshima

410 Words | 2 Pages

Japan was warned of the U.S. decision to attack and was given the opportunity to surrender. Japan remained persistent in their fight against the U.S., and refused to surrender (Harris). On August 6, 1945 the first atomic bomb, ‘Little Boy’, was launched on the Japanese center Hiroshima (“Hiroshima”). Approximately 70,000 to 80,000 individuals in the city were executed by the beginning impact. Various more passed away within the following weeks and years from wounds and radiation exposure.

Read More

To What Extent Is The Atomic Bomb Necessary Essay

935 Words | 4 Pages

Even after dropping bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the United States still didn’t know if Japan should

Read More

Was Hiroshima Bombing Justified

785 Words | 4 Pages

It was estimated by Churchill over a million Allied lives would be needed to defeat mainland Japan, (“The Christian Century Deplores the Bombing”). Although the numbers were highly speculated, Truman’s own advisors estimated 250,000 Americans live would have been lost taking mainland Japan with troops. The same number of Japanese soldiers, if not more, would have died defending their losing country, (John Green, Crash Course # 35) . Japanese culture of the time through Bushido, civilian soldiers, and attack tactics meant they likely would not have surrendered very easily. The decision to drop bombs on the two unsuspecting Japanese cities, ultimately saved more lives for both

Read More

Atomic Bomb Decision Essay

488 Words | 2 Pages

One of the reasons President Truman’s descision to drop the atomic bombs on Japan was appropriate is because the war might of countinued further. The Japanese were ordered to fight to the death by their emporer, Hirihito. If the bombs were not dropped, more deaths between the Axis Powers and the Allies would have occured. The bombs caused the Japanese to surrender, which put an end to their relentless fighting. Also, if the U.S. had chose to invade Japan instead of bomb them, it would’ve resulted in mass amounts of death for America.

Read More

Atomic Bomb Justified

1976 Words | 8 Pages

One of the few reasons that the dropping of the Atomic bombs was justified was the fact that Japan would not surrender. There was a large amount of evidence pointing to this: The allies had been dropping conventional and incendiary bombs on Japanese cities, but the Japanese refused to surrender. This gave the US the impression that ordinary bombs were not enough to convince Japan to surrender, and a more powerful bomb was needed. In addition, Japanese forces included Kamikaze pilots, which were-in essence-suicide bombers, willing to die for their emperor and their country. The Japanese military was also training

Read More

Persuasive Essay: The Use Of Nuclear Weapons In World War II

738 Words | 3 Pages

On October 11th 1939, President Frank D. Roosevelt received a letter from Albert Einstein and Leo Szilard that urged him to create an advisory committee regarding the use of nuclear weapons of mass destruction in World War II. Pearl Harbor was attacked by the Japanese on December 7th 1941. Article One, Section Eight of the Constitution states that Congress is given specific authority to declare war, raise and support armies and provide for a navy to protect citizens from foreign threats and thus the United States formally declared war on the Japanese, enraged by Japan’s actions against them. On December 11th 1941, U.S.A declared war on Germany and Italy. By this stage it was evident that the use of nuclear weapons of mass destruction would

Read More

More about Persuasive Essay: The Use Of Atomic Bombs In WWII

Open Document