Philosophy has made an impact with regards to abortion by allowing people greater freedom of choice. Before, abortion is largely prohibited in many countries, believing that the practice is immoral (Scott, 1998). Today, church and law still prevents people from making their own choices. Philosophy thus empowers people to make a reason by giving justifications on their decisions rather than let people follow blindly on what is expected of them.
Philosophy is open to exploring both sides of the argument towards abortion, allowing people to make an informed choice regarding it. The issue of abortion is largely subjective on whether or not they wish to abort a child, depending on the situation as well as the consequences. This enables them to be
…show more content…
Those who want to abortion may face a moral dilemma between the obligations not to end the potential life versus other factors, such as inability to support a child or it endangers her health. People who choose an abortion may not have the means to support their child or may risk their health being endangered. Many against abortion strongly feel that abortion is no different from murder, and is selfish and irresponsible (Lake, 1986). Philosophy may give answers to such questions people have. Papers discuss issues people face such was whether it is ethical or not to abort the fetus. At the end of the day, discussions provide a guide which allows people to choose the stand they wish to take. Some would support Don Marquis’ claim that it should be impermissible to prevent the fetus from living a life (Marquis), while others would support Mary Anne Warren’s paper about unborn fetuses makes the stand that abortion is not murder because we are not depriving them of anything, since they have do not know what life is like. This enables ethical concerns people may have about abortion to be clarified, thus making wiser …show more content…
Abortion is a topic where its views are laid out by society. In some societies, people are expected to uphold certain rules or opinions, else they would risk being stigmatized. (Abrams) Without using reasoning, people may be inclined to follow them. Research has shown that older generations, who grew up under strict abortion rules, are less likely to support it (Scott, 1998). With philosophy, people can logically make their own decision as they feel less inclined to follow what they have been taught. They learn to recognize that one should question what the authority says by learning about logical fallacies like the appeal to authority fallacy. This fallacy is the logical flaw whereby people believes whatever said by the authority to be right. Instead of appealing to it, philosophy teaches one to construct sound arguments, and this can be done by tracing reasons of why they support or reject abortion. For this reason, people have turned into reasons . This shows that reason has caused people to move away from the beliefs they previously attained from other