Pros And Cons Of Child Advocacy

592 Words3 Pages

Krugman’s was a pediatrician and he wanted to show that pediatrician’s day to day lives involve child advocacy. First, Krugman started by telling us the context of child negligence. Then, the article went on to tell us that individuals, families, communities, and federal/state are all the ways that you could be involved in child abuse advocacy. The main topic for this article would be that Child Advocacy could be done in a wide variety of ways. Some examples would be providing healthy food for a community with low income families or just by speaking up for the children because most of the time their voice will not be heard. The author is trying to get people to become a Child Abuse Advocate and by doing so she uses this article to explain what neglect is and all the ways you can do to help. …show more content…

These arguments in this article gave me a clear understanding of what being a child advocate really means. I think this article could have been somewhat biased because they did not give any cons to advocacy, they just explained all the pros. This source was a little bit different from some of the others I have reviewed it gave a lot of examples instead of facts.
Advocacy and Child Neglect is relevant to my research by giving me clear examples of what being a Child Abuse Advocate really means. This source helps me with my argument by giving me the examples I need to get everyone to go out and be a Child Abuse Advocate. Krugman really made me want to go out and become a Child Abuse Advocate.
Newman, Bernie Sue, PH.D., Dannenfelser, Paul L., M.S.S.W., and Pendleton, Derek, B.S. "Child Abuse Investigations: Reasons for Using Child Advocacy Centers and Suggestions for Improvement." EBSCO Publishing, Apr. 2005. Web. 9 Feb.