ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of Mandatory Drug Testing

1287 Words6 Pages

Chelsea Barrett
Hum 115
Corey Kittrell
12 December 2014
Mandatory Drug Testing For Welfare Recipients As many welfare programs are providing assistance to more and more Americans, abuse or misuse of these assistance programs is becoming more of an issue. Some people find drug testing welfare recipients is discriminatory (“pros and cons”). This however is simply not the case. It is something that should be implemented to protect the use of these programs and those who contribute to them. The reasons that drug testing to receive welfare or government assistance programs are: it could save the government money, many people who hold tax paying jobs must take drug tests to either gain employment or remain employed, and could be used as an incentive …show more content…

If someone who has children knows that in order to get the assistance necessary to support their family must pass and pass a drug test, may be less likely to abuse drugs and or alcohol. Knowing the importance of taking care of and supporting a family can weigh heavily on someone and having to pass a drug test to do so could very well be the driving for necessary to do so. This law could prove to be very beneficial in helping individuals stay off drugs or abuse the services offered to them, to help them. Some say that without the drugs, people could get very sick or even die without them. This is actually an argument for drug testing they just do not see it. It is not helping people to enable them to continue using drugs by handing them money to support these habits, it is in fact hurting them more so than helping them. The United States government along with state and county boards fund and provide substance, alcohol, even gambling rehabilitation programs for people who need but cannot afford to go to certain detox and rehabilitation programs. If drug testing can assist in finding these individuals using government assistance programs for the wrong reasons, they could actually get the get the help necessary and get their lives back on track for themselves and families instead of continuing to use drugs enabled by taxpayers’ dollars. The point of the law is not only the money spent, misused, and or saved. It also would be put in affect to help people on a personal level. If they need the help they must first begin to help

Show More
Related
1471 Words | 6 Pages

Randy E. Bartnett claims that “drug laws cause more harm to addicts and society than drugs themselves.” According to Bartnett, “Drug prohibition makes drugs so expensive, the addicts trying to crime in order to obtain money to buy them. Furthermore, drug prohibition is unfair in that it punishes users for committing a “crime” that has no victim.” Some people might agree with the idea that legalizing drugs would benefit addicts because then they would not be able to obtain drugs so easily.

Read More
1814 Words | 8 Pages

Drug abuse often is rampant among the lower socio-economic classes. The bill will directly affect families whose benefits are decreased, specifically, the children of the parents who test positive for drugs. This policy seeks to deny aid to the recipients who are using drugs, but benefits will continue for minor children. However, they will continue to suffer because they are dependent on their parents for sustenance.

Read More
1317 Words | 6 Pages

This goes to show the reason people so strongly want testing is to clarify the well being of the citizens their money is going to so that the money they spend is not wasted. In order to get a job you will most likely have to be drug tested, welfare is set up so you will eventually be able to get a job (“Drug Testing for Welfare Recipients: Pro”). This is to show that the taxpayers want to donate enough money to help recipients get back on their feet. Most jobs even require you to pass a drug test in order to work there. It is important for our community to remain healthy and sound in times of poverty.

Read More
1037 Words | 5 Pages

A possible solution to this issue is drug testing applicants before being accepted for food stamps, which is what Governor Soot Walker of Wisconsin is fighting for. Free treatment and job training would be provided to the individuals that

Read More
1104 Words | 5 Pages

Almost everyone around the world has seen or heard of poverty. Whether it is that middle-aged man on the side of the road begging for money or those commercials asking for donations while showing pictures of starving children. Over the years, these images of poverty have created a stigma that goes along with the poor; they are drug-abusing, uneducated, lazy people. Americans in poverty, specifically those receiving welfare, have been criticized with this stigma for many years. Because of this, many states across the country have been pushing to implement laws that require welfare recipients to be drug-tested prior to receiving their money.

Read More
1128 Words | 5 Pages

None of these proposals became law because most of the legislation was focused on “suspicionless” or “random” drug testing, which is at odds with a 2003 Michigan Court of Appeals case. Marchwinski v. Howard ruled that subjecting every welfare applicant in Michigan to a drug test without reason to believe that drugs were being used, was

Read More
1112 Words | 5 Pages

If someone test positive for some kind of illegal drug, it could be the first step to looking to getting them the help that is needed. Knowing that your aid depended on your ability to provide whatever necessary to pass a drug test, the recipients are more than likely to stay clean. It might also give them a little more of an incentive to know they can’t live and continue doing what they’re doing. That would lead to them maybe even trying to further their education so they can get a better job. A result of that would eventually lead to the need for the assistance, reducing some.

Read More
1502 Words | 7 Pages

Thirty-five percent of Americans recieve help from welfare every day, and if we drug test them that number would suddenly drop. Some individuals claim that drug testing would help individuals by putting them into treatment; however, there are several reasons why drug testing would not help recipients. While drug testing could recognize the individuals who need help, problems would be caused such as impacts on the person, the cost, and other impacts such as on children and poverty levels. I A. First, drug testing will cause problems with the money people are receiving. If the test is positive the recipient will have reduced income and they may not get any income at all (US Department of Health and Human Services 8).

Read More
460 Words | 2 Pages

In 2000, a judge from Michigan ruled that drug testing welfare recipients had violated the recipients privacy rights (“Federal Appeals Court Upholds Ban on Testing Welfare Recipients for Drugs,” p. 1). The drug testing method also goes against the Fourth Amendment right to be free of search and seizures by the government without probable cause. People feel that the poor should not have to choose between providing for their family and give up their rights (“Federal Appeals Court Upholds Ban on Testing Welfare Recipients for Drugs,” p. 4). As a result, some states choose not to require drug test, because they feel it is

Read More
220 Words | 1 Pages

William Shakespeare remains to be an author that very few scholars of his understand what the famous playwriter behind the famous plays like Romeo and Juliet, A Midsummer Night’s Dream, Henry IV, and Hamlet really thought. The many plays William Shakespeare wrote with different characters and plots, they remain connected to each other through a statement or idea made by a character. Each play presented characters from each play that will contradict, or challenge other characters found in another play. For example, a character from Romeo and Juliet contradicts a statement or idea presented in Hamlet. Since these characters will contradict or challenge another character’s idea, it’s impossible to understand William Shakespeare’s actual feelings

Read More
579 Words | 3 Pages

In Michigan, there was a law created that drug tests should be used in 2003 and it was found unconstitutional. According to American Civil Liberties Union, this point came up in the case of Marchwinski v. Howard this case took place in the U.S Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit and the policy was deemed unconstitutional. In the United States Constitution, drug testing welfare recipients violate the fourth amendment. Drug testing welfare recipients fall under the category of unreasonable searches. Many welfare recipients can tell their privacy is being striped away from them.

Read More
1053 Words | 5 Pages

There are many factual reasons on why people agree that drug testing welfare people is wrong. “Some who would have to undergo the drug testing are offended by the implication that simply because you are having financial problems

Read More
1404 Words | 6 Pages

The informed reader will notice all the facts and agree. If the government starts taking control and regulating who is receiving assistance the government could give to more people in true stricken poverty situations. If someone can feed a drug habit rather than feeding themselves or their family then they do not deserve the assistance and need help. And as what was said earlier those who need help and want help the government could help provide that for them. In doing this we will also help lower the drug related crimes in our cities and towns.

Read More
659 Words | 3 Pages

I want to know, how many times are you forced to do something humiliating and demoralizing just so that you can put food on the table? Anyone that isn’t using public assistance probably isn't raising their hand. Recently, state legislators have been introducing legislation that require drug-testing people who receive public assistance. This drug testing is unconstitutional and unfair to the poor. Everyone should get drug tested for jobs not only the poor people.

Read More
1203 Words | 5 Pages

Mandatory drug testing helps identify individuals who can benefit from substance abuse treatment so they can receive help and will, according to drug testing advocates, save money in the long-term. Alternative drug testing methodologies exist. Even if wholesale drug testing of all welfare applicants is not proving to be cost-effective, it is possible to restructure policy so that, for example, only individuals who are suspected of drug abuse will be tested. Precedent in the job market. Members of state legislatures have argued that drug testing is often required by employers, so it is reasonable to also require drug testing for welfare patients.

Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of Mandatory Drug Testing

Related Topics

Open Document