ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of Mandatory Drug Testing

1287 Words6 Pages

Chelsea Barrett
Hum 115
Corey Kittrell
12 December 2014
Mandatory Drug Testing For Welfare Recipients As many welfare programs are providing assistance to more and more Americans, abuse or misuse of these assistance programs is becoming more of an issue. Some people find drug testing welfare recipients is discriminatory (“pros and cons”). This however is simply not the case. It is something that should be implemented to protect the use of these programs and those who contribute to them. The reasons that drug testing to receive welfare or government assistance programs are: it could save the government money, many people who hold tax paying jobs must take drug tests to either gain employment or remain employed, and could be used as an incentive …show more content…

If someone who has children knows that in order to get the assistance necessary to support their family must pass and pass a drug test, may be less likely to abuse drugs and or alcohol. Knowing the importance of taking care of and supporting a family can weigh heavily on someone and having to pass a drug test to do so could very well be the driving for necessary to do so. This law could prove to be very beneficial in helping individuals stay off drugs or abuse the services offered to them, to help them. Some say that without the drugs, people could get very sick or even die without them. This is actually an argument for drug testing they just do not see it. It is not helping people to enable them to continue using drugs by handing them money to support these habits, it is in fact hurting them more so than helping them. The United States government along with state and county boards fund and provide substance, alcohol, even gambling rehabilitation programs for people who need but cannot afford to go to certain detox and rehabilitation programs. If drug testing can assist in finding these individuals using government assistance programs for the wrong reasons, they could actually get the get the help necessary and get their lives back on track for themselves and families instead of continuing to use drugs enabled by taxpayers’ dollars. The point of the law is not only the money spent, misused, and or saved. It also would be put in affect to help people on a personal level. If they need the help they must first begin to help

Open Document