Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
Pros and cons of oil sands in alberta
Pollution from oil drilling
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Pros and cons of oil sands in alberta
Pollution from oil drilling
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Canada should not allow The Enbridge Northern Gateway Pipeline to go through as it poses to many environmental and ecological risks. Pristine areas across central and northern BC, including the Great Bear Rainforest, are under threat if the Enbridge Northern Gateway Pipeline is put into service. In the end, the concerns over the BC pipeline outweigh the possible benefits the pipeline may result in. The Canadian oil and gas company Enbridge, proposed the Northern Gateway project as a solution to transport 525,000 barrels of crude oil per day.
Environmentalists see the movie Avatar as a close depiction of our society's reality with the Alberta oil sands. James Cameron, the director of Avatar, created this blockbuster to bring awareness to a growing issue of Alberta’s oil sands. Undoubtedly, he has achieved this task as this movie shows numerous similarities, but also some differences regarding the current situation with the oil sands. Both show similarities when it comes to cultural and environmental sustainabilities. One environmental sustainabilities that both Avatar and the Alberta oil sands share is that in both situations mining companies decrease biodiversity.
As The Assembly of The First Nations Regional Chief for British Columbia, I say that the Enbridge Pipeline is a risk to the environment, the ecosystems, the health and the safety to the First Nations and the citizens of British Columbia. We First Nations have had 21,000 people sign off on the online petition “hold the wall”. The pipeline route will interfere homes of where six First Nations live and their willing to put their lives on hold to fight against the Enbridge Pipeline.
The toxic chemicals released from extraction were poisoning clean water sources. This lead to increasing cases of cancer, hyperthyroidism, lupus, and renal failure in people located in areas near the present pipeline. These effects clearly show the vast hazard this oil presents for the environment and society. In conclusion, as stated and proven throughout this essay, the Keystone pipeline creates many environmental issues.
less damage in the pipeline can cause the environment to be clean and to allow the people not to be worried and to think that the pipe can transport the crude oil
David Hughes, a geoscientist, say stopping the pipeline development is a step in the right direction when it comes to weaning dependence on fossil fuels. According to McKibben, the Alberta oil sands are “one of the five or six largest pools of carbon on the planet,” and extracting oil from them would be the equivalent of putting at least six million more cars on the road (“Room for Debate”). Since carbon emissions are the primary culprit in accelerating climate change, opposition to a pipeline that would release such a huge amount of them is prudent. Hughes agrees and argues that protesting the development of Keystone XL is actually not just a symbolic effort, but one that has economic effects. He points to the fact that Canada’s options at transporting tar sand oil with other alternative shipping methods like other pipelines or rail line are limited due to public opposition and slow regulatory processes.
The environmental argument is coming from a clash over the fact they are basically stripping the canadian boreal forest, the path of the pipeline extends across major aquifers, and pipelines tend to leak and destroy surrounding environments. In addition ccording to The Center for Climate and Energy Solutions State, “epartment’s draft SEIS found that oil from the Canadian oil sands is 17 percent more carbon-intensive than the average oil consumed in the United States... It is estimated that the U.S. greenhouse gas footprint would increase by 3 million to 21 million metric tons per year, or around 0.04 percent to 0.3 percent of the 2010 levels, if Keystone is built. Fortunately on November 6, 2015, President Barack Obama’s administration rejected the Keystone Pipeline XL after 7 years of dispute. As mentioned in the Wall Street Journal, Obama stated “the project would not have lowered gas prices, improved energy security or made a meaningful long-term contribution to the economy
The debate of whether or not the pipeline should be built or not, has brought a lot of attention throughout Canada. Many people stand for and against it, just as there is pros and cons for both sides. Time is almost up as it is coming down to the final decision of whether or not it is going to be continued or discontinued. There are more benefits from the expansion of this pipeline for Canada and even the rest of the world. I believe that the Trans Mountain Pipeline should be built because it can help benefit and could come to terms peacefully among Indigenous communities, regulates environmental safety precautions to prevent damage to the environment, and will overall increase the boost of Canada’s economy.
Many people’s jobs rely on the natural resources of Canada and we all rely in natural resources to live out are everyday life’s, such as water. If we start building around all these resources people would lose jobs. Everyday as humans we are learning new things and coming up with new ideas causing Canada and the world around us to be constantly changing. We have changed are
5. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Conclusions From this study, we realize that Ghana has had a long standing history of gold production, dating back to the colonial era: The economy continues to be a dominant gold producer in Africa and the world. Further, gold production has contributed significantly towards the development of the economy of Ghana; providing the much needed foreign exchange earnings; as well as jobs and incomes for the citizenry. The librazilization of gold production in 1989 following the Economic Recovery Program (ERP) in 1983 allowed the operation of small scale gold mining. Small scale gold production has led to increase in gold production and export, however, liberalization, gold export and the existence of small scale
When you look around the horizon of Texas, you can see incredible cities stretching for miles long. You can see the lofty Reunion Tower looking down upon the great city of Dallas or the even great universities still standing from the original foundations such as the University of Texas. These incredible sights we see and attend can all be thanked by the development of Spindletop in 1901, the first oil rig in Texas to gush with oil. Although, many wives of oil workers would have disagreed to this accusation. The would say that oil has destroyed their relationships by taking their men away.
Mining is one of Canada’s primary industries, it involves extraction, refinery, and the processing of valuable minerals such as gold, copper, iron, nickel and zinc. All of the provinces except Prince Edward Island has had significant mining activities, but the industry is concentrated in provinces like Ontario, Quebec, Saskatchewan and British Columbia. Although mining is key to Canada’s economy, the country had been criticized for its methods of extraction of the minerals since it has negative impacts on the environment. This report will first describe how the mineral industry is important to Canada’s economy and will also fully describe one method that the industry employs to extract the minerals, and how it affects the natural environment.
As the years progressed and the ages evolved, the demand for minerals and ores increased. The high demand resulted in a faster process and worse environmental conditions, when mining. These mining strategies posed a threat towards Canada’s environment and created a challenge the country had to face. The strategies created “erosion, sinkholes, loss of biodiversity, contamination of soil, ground and surface water.” (nrcan.gr.ca/mining)
Not only will there be detrimental effects on communities, but closing Alberta’s coal mines will cost the province billions of dollars, even more will be spent after that on developing a more “natural method” of producing electricity. Natural gas will cause just as much if not more harm to the environment than coal. This change will cause more harm than good.
Coal energy can be defined as power produced by coal burning generators or industrial applications using large amounts of Coal for heat, including steel manufacturing (Oxford Dictionary). But, really, what is so good about coal, and what is so bad about it. “In a coal-fired steam station—much like a nuclear station—water is turned into steam, which in turn drives turbine generators to produce electricity. Here's how the process works. Before the coal is burned, it is pulverized to the fineness of talcum powder.”