ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of Paying College Athletes

1015 Words5 Pages

Should college athletes be paid?
Athletes, though hardly massively productive citizens of our workforce, earn more money than 99% of people who work within our workforce. People who work eight hour shifts for large companies could never hope to earn the millions of dollars that many athletes earn a year. The average person in America in 2016 made $51,539 according to Fox Business. This difference in salary causes the average high school graduate with athletic talent want to move past college as fast as possible. In Baseball, High School athletes can choose to skip college and enter the pros. For college athletes in other sports like Football on the other hand, they must spend much of their time playing in college to be considered for …show more content…

These universities use the image of their star players in order to sell tickets to the games. The star players recieve nothing from this one sided relationship, meaning why should they work for free for a college? In the pros on the other hand, each athlete earn a fair amount, so all the money that the franchises earn is fair since they pay each of these types of players millions of dollars a year. With this in mind, the NCAA should be able to give these players a little piece of the pie, since they are the ones that cause the pie to be as expensive as it …show more content…

They say that while injuries can be problematic, this is what they have signed up for when playing sports and just because there are injuries does not mean that the athletes deserves to be paid. There is also a major concern with the idea in terms of how much an athlete would deserve and how the college would find enough money to pay every student athlete. While these concerns are noted, these institutions are generating loads of money at present and it will soon reach that point where they will need to provide the athletes payment because they will be able to do this soon enough. Young athletes at the time also are not concerned specifically with their education because in their mind, they can come back later in life after their careers and finish their degrees. A college degree is not enough anymore for an athlete to decide to stay at an NCAA program for four

Show More
Related
103 Words | 1 Pages

College schools provide for student athletes enough. They pay for everything provided for the the students whether it’s scholarships or playing in the school games. Through it all it really doesn’t matter if they (the athletes) get paid for, it’s the opportunity that the coaches and university give them to play on the

Read More
956 Words | 4 Pages

Major college football and basketball programs bring in millions of dollars a year for their university and the NCAA. Many people claim the players are the reason these programs make so much money and should be compensated for their work. At first this seems to be logical, but there are many flaws with paying athletes. However, athletes should be able to pursue business opportunities. College athletes should not be paid for playing sports, but should be able to have an outside income.

Read More
2239 Words | 9 Pages

The reasons college athletes should be paid is because although they have their scholarship; it typically does not pay for everything. Secondly other people make money off of the college athletes. And lastly college athletes do not have the time to get a decent job, or even a job at all. The NCAA does not allow athletes to be paid which

Read More
1877 Words | 8 Pages

With all the publicity and respect, these athletes get, it evidently noticeable that are almost near the poverty line. The NCAA has continuously claimed that the athletes should not be paid because they will not do well in their studies. Nevertheless, if everyone looks at the future of these players, one can tell that these people should be paid for every minute they spend playing for the college because not many of them are sure they will get a job. In addition, they spend most of their time; practicing and at times they spend sometimes out of school because of these sports. Therefore, it's worthy for college athletes to receive a pay that will motivate them to continue being in the field (Schoville,

Read More
1344 Words | 6 Pages

A common argument for why these athletes should be paid is that they are generating revenue for the school. Even though the athletes generate money for their school most of it is used to support the programs generating the revenue by providing the scholarships that are bringing in the top recruits to the school in the first place. That doesn’t even factor in the medical and travel expenses, free gear, top-notch coaching, unlimited use of elite athletic facilities and a national stage to audition for a job in the professional ranks (Dirlam). Many college athletes are being reimbursed with nearly as much money as the average American makes per year through their scholarships and extra amenities (Dirlam). Another argument that was seen in an online article was that it would not change the quality of top schools through the payment of players (Peebles).

Read More
2151 Words | 9 Pages

Since the beginning of NCAA athletes have poured their blood, sweat and tears into the sport they are passionate about. Its always about the love of the game, who out works the other and many of sacrifices to be a student athlete at the collegiate level. When athletes reach their goal to enter in the collegiate level it becomes more like a business, and their job is win games and championships which ultimately brings profits to these universities. Over the years people including the athletes have debated upon the issue on whether college athletes should be paid. Some people argue that athletes should get paid because they don’t have time to work or find a job.

Read More
1238 Words | 5 Pages

The reasoning for the objections can include that “they are just amateurs,” and that they “should be grateful to receive a free education.” For the people who say that they are amateurs, college athletics is just as big of a business as professional sports are, but the difference is that all of the money in college sports go to the athletic directors, coaches, commissioners, and NCAA instead of going to the players. Also, they spend roughly forty hours a week playing, practicing, and training for their sport, which is almost as much as a typical job. That means that their Division I sport is technically their job, so shouldn’t they be compensated for it? Regarding the argument that student athletes should be grateful they receive a free education, this “free education” is only free for so many people.

Read More
789 Words | 4 Pages

”The players are classified as students rather than athletes, so they do not receive the same legal protections as employees”(“College athletes should be paid for their participation”). This is a huge problem. Since student athletes are considered just students, colleges are not legally obligated to pay the athletes for their work or cover any expenses if they get injured while playing their sport. In the summer of 2021 The NCAA's rule change allowed college athletes to sign paid endorsement deals so student-athletes could profit from their own names, images, and likenesses”(“college athletes should be paid for their participation”). it wasn't until 2021 that students could make money for their advertising so they were getting no compensation and some players that are not as well known still get no money.

Read More
679 Words | 3 Pages

NCAA athletes should receive compensation because they spend countless hours practicing and completing school work, universities are making more money than ever, and athletes literally place their bodies on the line. First of all, NCAA athletes should be paid because of the work they put into their sport and studies. Athletes not only spend hours practicing and weight lifting, but they are also expected to go to class and perform well in their studies. Free time is seldom found for collegiate athletes, and hard work is a definite must. If athletes have any extra time, a good percentage of them probably

Read More
2039 Words | 9 Pages

Also, what if an athlete gets hurt will the university still pay an injured athlete? It is not practical for all colleges to pay their athletes. If student athletes get paid, the money will effect the university, the athletes and many other people. Despite the fact that college athletes bring in some of the universities' revenue college athletes should not be paid.

Read More
952 Words | 4 Pages

Another problem that universities would run into if they were to pay the athletes, is the special treatment that they would receive on campus on a daily basis. The athletes that play smaller sports such as baseball, hockey, and track would not be thrilled with other athletes being paid, while they are not receiving any money. This problem is inevitable because football and basketball are the only two collegiate sports that consistently make a profit for their schools, so schools could not afford to pay all of the athletes in all the different sports at the university. Even though there are valid reasons to continue not to pay the athletes, the positives of paying the players heavily outweighs the negatives.

Read More
1829 Words | 8 Pages

There is no reason to pay college athletes because they are students first and academics should be one’s first priority, they already receive their fair share in extras, many of the athletes receive financial help through athletic scholarships, and the NCAA is an amateur enterprise and no amateur athlete in any sport is paid. The main reason colleges exist is to allow people the chance to get an education and earn a degree. Student-athletes are no exception to this. Just as other students are involved in clubs or groups, athletes play sports. Those students are students first

Read More
875 Words | 4 Pages

Should college athletes be paid? College athletes should be paid do with the work they put in for their school and all the money they bring to the school. I get it that there on full scholarship well, some of them, but they also bring in millions to their school just off of one sport sometimes. And for the NCAA not wanting to pay them is absolutely dumb! Just to throw out a little bit of facts the NCAA nearly topped 1 billion in revenue in the 2014 season.

Read More
1646 Words | 7 Pages

Should college athletes be paid? I think they should. I found three main reason why other people and myself think that college athletes deserve pay. One, you can just pay the sports that produce the most revenue. Two, these student athletes put in lots of work and even sometimes have to miss class to go to the sports event.

Read More
904 Words | 4 Pages

When people hear about if college athletes should get paid they would say no because they think the athletes would get paid millions of dollars. It is not like that, college athletes would not be paid that high they would only need to be paid so they can live a decent life. They have to balance their lives with school and their sports. College athletes should get paid because The NCCA is billion dollar business and the athletes don’t get any money, athletes spend more hours working for the sport than the average American, it helps athletes manage their money.

Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of Paying College Athletes

Related Topics

Open Document