Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Capital punishment opposing viewpoints
Ethics of capital punishment
The effectiveness of capital punishment
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Capital punishment opposing viewpoints
While there are far more subjects to discuss regarding to this issue, I feel it necessary to state that I believe the death penalty should exist in a perfect society. I believe that certain crimes and certain situations warrant the punishment of death. However, the our society is not perfect. The justice system has failed to fairly use this punishment in far too many instances, and concludes that they cannot justly wield this
The moral of the death penalty is that when someone commits a heinous crime, they should be prosecuted in a way that is equal to their crime. Robert Blecker, JD said that "We have the responsibility to punish those who deserve it, but only to the degree they deserve it...." This states that people should get what they deserve. If they go out and commit homicide or murder for fun they should get the same treatment. Losing someone can be tragic, but losing someone because a criminal killed them is even worse.
The death penalty is currently legal in 31 states in the United States. The fact that capital punishment is not morally required in any case is true. One could argue jail is not moral either and we would have a larger number of criminals who do not fear any type of punishment. Why should mercy be shown to those who commit senseless acts that take another’s life, on of the most sacred things?
Capital punishment, or the death penalty, is a legal process in which a person is put to death as a punishment for a crime by the government of a nation. The United States is in the minority group of nations that uses the death penalty. There are thirty-three states that allow capital punishment and seventeen states that abolished it (Death Penalty Information Center). The morality of the death penalty has been debated for many years. Some people want capital punishment to be abolished due to how it can cost a lot more than life imprisonment without parole, how they think it is immoral to kill, and how innocent people can be put to death.
The execution in May 1989 involving Stephen McCoy is one in several examples of these defective results. According to witnesses, McCoy reacted violently to the lethal injection given to him. According to the Flawed Executions, the Anti-Death Penalty Movement, and the Politics of Capital Punishment article, “after the drug was administered McCoy was seen gagging, violently coughing, and undergoing body contortions” (Haines). Examples such as these show that the systems that has been put in place, and the methods used in order to afflict capital punishment has some defects. Morally speaking, one cannot consider to willingly and with a clear conscious sentence an individual to a punishment that completely fraudulent and unethical.
Has DNA ever cleared someone who is on death row? Has someone been put to death who was innocent? If the answers are yes, then the death penalty should be abolished. The first argument is that states use illegal execution drugs. Arizona and Texas ordered Sodium Thiopental (a drug that id used to paralyses the muscles and stop the heart).
We all have opinions and views, so I am not looking for a fight with my readers on this controversial subject, I have just not said much on it ever in my writings in the past, of over 5000-poems, articles, books, short stories, and so forth, and why I ask myself, have l left out Capital Punishment? The best reasoning I came up with was: I never got around to it, I always had my beliefs, opinions, thoughts on the subject: so right or wrong, here area a few. Most of my view comes from my Graduate Studies at Liberty University, in Old Testament Studies (and perhaps, being in the Army for 11-years also framed my thoughts on the subject): "Whoso sheddeth man's blood, by man shall his blood be shed; for in the image of God made he man." (KJV Genesis
It does most times gives the victims` families closure and feeling of justice. As crazy as it sounds in some cases the victim(s)’ families does not want execution just simple jail time, but the states want
On average, there are about three thousand crimes daily from theft to rape to murders. Many of these criminals that are caught are taken into the prison. Many prisons are starting to overflow because there are too many crimes today. One in nine criminals are facing life in prison. Life sentenced type of criminals should be sentenced to the death penalty.
There are numerous things in this society which ought to be banned however the death penalty is not one of them. It is most likely the right approach to go the extent that capital order is concerned. At this moment in our nation, I think that it crazy that criminals believe that they can escape with pretty much anything. My argument for this essay is that death penalty is a resource for society; it discourages potential criminals and also serves retaliation to criminals, and is not the slightest bit indecent. The death penalty can be a greatly valuable device in sentencing criminals that have perpetrated a portion of the most exceedingly terrible crimes known to society.
The death penalty is simply racist, economically outrageous, and insufficient for modern American society. Black defendants versus white victims are three times more likely to be recommended for the death penalty than a white defendant versus black victim resulting in the statistics being unacceptable. The cost for one inmate on death row is estimated at 1.2 million United States dollars (USD). The death penalty is also unethical and there are also better alternatives. Life without parole.
The death penalty happen in all different type of states. In every state that retains the death penalty, jurors have the option of sentencing convicted capital murderers to life in prison without the possibility of parole. The sentence is cheaper to tax-payers and keeps violent offenders off the streets for good. Death penalties mostly consist of various forms of murder such as murder commited during a drug related drive by shooting, murder during kidnapping, murder for hire, and genocide. During the death penalty those who kill white peoples are more likely to be sentenced to die than those that kill African-Americans.
People are killing prisoners instead of leaving them, to suffer and rot in prison for their lives. Is the death penalty appropriate? Or should it be banned. If you kill them they will not suffer for what they did. Putting someone under the death penalty costs more money them keeping them in prison.
Capital Punishment also known as the death penalty is a controversial topic. A lot of people think that the death penalty is against human rights; however, what right does a criminal have to take a life or to do grotesques crimes? Others say the death penalty say that the consequences of the death penalty are irreversible. But, wasn’t the criminal taking someone else’s life also irreversible? Criminals don’t think to value theirs or the other people’s lives.
One should not doubt the morality of the capital punishment as the crimes of theft, murder, kidnapping, betrayal, torture and rape destroy all ethical principles. The constitutionality makes the death penalty a new form of the execution depriving criminals of pain and suffering. The government saves money spent on imprisonment using the capital punishment. Another advantage of the death penalty is deterrence that prevents juveniles from committing crimes. The death penalty deters murders and statistics together with the common sense prove