Pros And Cons Of The Death Penalty

581 Words3 Pages

People are killing prisoners instead of leaving them, to suffer and rot in prison for their lives. Is the death penalty appropriate? Or should it be banned.If you kill them they will not suffer for what they did. Putting someone under the death penalty costs more money them keeping them in prison. When they review the case they might be a small error and they would be free or the case may fail. If they kill people in prison they have to live to know they killed a person no matter how terrible. If you put the prisoners under the death penalty they will be put out of there misery. There are 159 thousand people in prison for life never getting out for what they did. There are 2.2 people in prison in the U.S. So almost 1/20 of them are in prison for life. the prisons may be more crowded. Some of the people on death row are sociopaths and they want to die so they would be giving them that satisfaction. Some people want to be put out there misery and do bad stuff in prison so they would die instead of live horribly in prison with nothing.“Both in raw numbers and by percentage of the population, the United States has the most prisoners of any developed country in the world- and it has the largest total prison population of any nation” (Nicole Flatow). …show more content…

It costs $1.26 million dollars to put someone on death row. There are 3,002 people on death row right now so they would be $3,782,520,000 to give them all the death penalty.Thirty-four of the states in the U.S. Have the death penalty and we could be using that money for other things like ending hunger, helping the homeless etc. "Cases without the death penalty cost $740,000, while cases where the death penalty is sought cost $1.26 million. Maintaining each death row prisoner costs taxpayers $90,000 more per year than a prisoner in general