ipl-logo

Pros And Cons Of US Government Bombing Of The Bikini Atolls

404 Words2 Pages
Why do governments destroy then rebuild? Bikini Atolls people is like primitive man. So, they need to improve their life. Because they cannot get better life if they keep live like that. So government destroy the Bikini Atolls and then rebuild the Bikini Atolls. The article said “and in 1975 they initiated a lawsuit against the US Government to terminate the resettlement effort until a satisfactory and comprehensive radiological survey had been carried out. The Bikini Atoll was an example of the government bombing and then fixing it later. The United States should not have bombed Bikini Atoll because it negatively affected the way the people live, where the people lived, and how the people lived.

First, people could not live off the land.
Show More
Related
109 Words | 1 Pages

I believe that the bombing of Japan was an over the top choice by the Americans. This way of bombing the Japanese was very inhumane, and left thousands dead. The A-bomb was extremely inhumane, there were a number of other options that the americans could have used, instead of bombing Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Some might think that the A-bomb saved america, but it destroyed Japan. They didn’t realize how much the A-bomb would affect the people and the whole country of Japan, the 20,000 kilojoule bomb killed 140,000 people within the months that followed.

Read More
1357 Words | 6 Pages

Would the Americans have joined World War 2 if the bombing of Pearl Harbour had not taken place? Introduction Many historians and people in general believe that the United States would have eventually joined the war on the European front, however, not many expected war with Japan to come earlier than the former. With that being said, the sense of isolationism in the US, however, was still extremely strong and prevalent, effectively impeding any possible war efforts made by Roosevelt, but then came the bombing of Pearl Harbour which, to all of history, is seen as the tipping point for the end of US isolationism policies. The very day after the bombing President Franklin D. Roosevelt spoke to parliament in his address on the attack on

Read More
1176 Words | 5 Pages

During the time of the World War II and because of the surprise attack by Japan towards the US naval base Pearl Harbor, located on the island of Hawaii, the enmity between these two countries was declared. The situation that caused a lot of controversy was the decision taken by President Franklin D. Roosevelt to sign the executive order 9066 in May 1942. This order was to internalize Japanese and even entire families in remote areas of the cities to be able to avoid any type of espionage by Japan, since there was no way to ensure that the Japanese Americans and their families were loyal to the nation of the United States. The internees began one month after the signature of the new order. Buses and trains were used to transport the japanese in the fields of California which were under military guard.

Read More
910 Words | 4 Pages

Dropping a nuke on a country can cause lots of difficulty. The Americans dropping of the atomic bomb on Hiroshima was the most controversial topics in American history. Truman was the active president who made the final decision for this act. Many people believe that Truman made the correct decision while others are in complete disagreement with the decision. President Truman made the correct choice in dropping the atomic bomb because it showed the United States had power, it helped end the war quickly, and saved many lives.

Read More
543 Words | 3 Pages

Japan had launched an attack on Pearl Harbor that killed about 2,000 American citizens on December 7, 1941. Additionally, the attack had disabled the U.S. Pacific Fleet, which had a non-combatant status at the time. This proved, that Japan not only posed a great threat to the U.S. but also the rest of the Allies. With the attack being both brutal and unexpected, the only reasonable thing to do was to eliminate the possible threat of more casualties. Some may argue that the dropping of the bomb was both unjustified and inhuman, as it killed many innocent Japanese civilians.

Read More
627 Words | 3 Pages

The decision to drop the atomic bomb on Japan is a decision that has been debated since the bomb fell. While Truman may have made the decision because he felt it was “ethical,” the actual amount of ethics in the decision has been up for debate. The atomic bomb had been in design before Truman stepped up to president when Franklin D. Roosevelt died of a cerebral hemorrhage in April of 1945. The atomic bomb had actually been in development since Albert Einstein warned the United States that Germany was trying to develop an atomic bomb of its own in 1939.

Read More
170 Words | 1 Pages

Only two out of the 110 pounds of fissile material in the nuclear bomb actually blew up on Hiroshima. In the article, “The Hiroshima Bombing: What you need to know about the nuclear attack,” by The Los Angeles Times, it proceeds to state facts about the Hiroshima bombing and about President Obama’s trip to Japan. Obama is the first president to visit Hiroshima since the bombing and has clearly stated that it is not an apology trip. About 140,000 people were killed in the bombing from the initial blast or by radiation poisoning. Not only Japanese were killed, a dozen Americans and 20,000 Koreans were also killed.

Read More
294 Words | 2 Pages

The estimated amount of people that died in the bombing of HIroshima is 140,000 people. In August 1941 president Truman dropped two atomic bombs on Hiroshima, Japan. Some say that the atomic bomb was the right thing to do and others say it is not. The atomic bomb was wrong because there were alternatives, the bomb was only made for defense, and many people were killed for unnecessary reasons.

Read More
241 Words | 1 Pages

My strongest argument AGAINST using the atomic bomb is that it will kill thousands of innocent people. The bomb that was dropped over Hiroshima instantly killed about 80,000 civilians. Those who survived were seriously injured with burns, and more people would also die from the radiation. This was talked about on page 188, “...instantly killed almost 80,000 civilians. The nuclear blast left many more people maimed or hideously burned, while others fell victim to a new, more gradual killer – radiation poisoning.”

Read More
340 Words | 2 Pages

The decision to drop the bomb was a difficult decision to make. WW2 could have gone many different ways if we decided not to drop the bomb. There were two different sides to dropping the bomb, there were the people who wanted to drop the bomb, and the people who didn't want to drop the bomb. The atomic bomb was a hard decision to make, even though many people didn't like the idea, there were different sides to the story of the people who wanted to drop the bomb.

Read More
304 Words | 2 Pages

Opinion Atomic Bomb Paper - Unassisted Are you against or with the idea of dropping the atomic bomb?If you think we shouldn't be wrong. What would have happened if we didn’t drop the atomic bomb. If you didn’t know an atomic bomb was a bond that we made to end world war 2.In my opinion dropping the atomic bomb was the right idea. How World War Two Started First,World War Two started in 1939 and ended in 1945.It was a global war that fought between different countries.

Read More
251 Words | 2 Pages

Everyone have different opinions towards the atomic bomb being dropped by the U.S. Some people think that this wasn’t a good idea, but others feel that it was necessary. Dropping the atomic bomb was revenge from when Japan attacked Pearl Harbor. It was only fair that we bombed them in return. It may have killed a lot of people, but they killed a lot of our people as well.

Read More
492 Words | 2 Pages

Opinion Atomic Bomb Paper - Unassisted The atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagaski was a tragic day in Japan, killing millions of innocent women and children working old and young ages to help the Emperor and country. This was a day that will live in infamy for many Japanese citizens. In my opinion, the atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagaski was the worst decision America has made to terminate war. The U.S. had an original plan before the atomic bomb.

Read More
683 Words | 3 Pages

When the first bomb was tested on Bikini Atoll, it was the first time that a nuclear weapon had been used after the 1945 attack on Japan by the U.S. (Eschner). For the testing, the 167 islanders of Bikini Atoll were moved to Rongerik Atoll. After the testing was done, some of the islanders returned to Bikini. Soon after they moved back, it became clear that the radioactivity levels in Bikini were still critically high so they had to be moved back. The U.S. government completed a cleanup project in response to a lawsuit that the Bikini islanders filed but, the radiation levels were still deemed too high to allow people to move back (Britannica, The Editors of Encyclopaedia).

Read More
756 Words | 4 Pages

Identify 3 journal articles (published within the past 10 years) that deal with your research topic. For each article, answer the following questions: • Reference article in proper APA format AND attach to assignment • Reason: What aspect of your research question is this paper addressing? • Summary : What is the main focus on this research article?

Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of US Government Bombing Of The Bikini Atolls

Related Topics

Open Document